Amrun 121 wrote:Ghostwriter: Why can't you just iso me? I have already explained it. By saying he is some sort of doctor (because someone with the namclaim of doctor would likely also have a doctor role) he has told everyone, including scum, that he is NOT the doctor, because no real dopctor would do that. Scum often go doctor-hunting, and now they know that kcda isn't a doctor.
I see your point, but I don't agree.
---
Amrun 136 wrote:Why would I push for someone's lynch based solely off of one post?
WIFOM incoming!
*runs for cover*
But seriously, you could've fooled me. You voted to lynch immediately after his post.
Amrun 144 wrote:You think it's smart to tunnel on someone for one post alone?
WIFOM incoming!
*runs for cover, again*
---
GW 146 wrote:I find it odd that, whilst claiming to want more discussion on Amrun/Kcda, Smargaret does not ask questions of them. Several people have been interested in their interaction, but they usually follow up with questions.
I like this. Good point.
---
Mist 153 wrote:Kcd you seem obsessed with Amrun. Why is that?
Neither can I. I'm going to PM the Mod that she's my #1 on my list! <3 <3 <3
But seriously, I agree with your observation. It seems very odd.
---
Mod 156 wrote:The votes recorded in the "votecount" don't have any impact on the game, I just thought it would make life easier for everyone.
How sweet!
---
Kcda 169 wrote:I have a slight scum read on GW for being tunneling and aggro.
Bs. What's wrong with being aggressive? And I completely disagree that he's tunneling. This is just you trying to tack on some fake rationale behind your vote. Not good scumhunting, Kcda. Not good at all.