Because...you must die.
Open 309 - Fire and Ice [Game Over]
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki wrote:Matt is going the wrong way.
Would you agree or disagree with this, Toro?
Disagree, that post was what gave me uneasy vibes regarding Robo, the 3rd answer he gave just sounds like "Well I will play to the best of abilities and won't divulge any info on if I really am, and no, no I'm not." Obviously you don't want to say yes to a question like that, but the way he said no was raising some red flags in my head.
I just realize I haven't answered matt's questions yet.
1. I've been playing mafia for...gee whiz, it's been a while, 4 years I'm guessing?
2. I'll be online enough where I can post every day.
3. No, but I am a Spanish translation for bull.
Vote: Toro.
When he's speaking with Hiraki, his posts are implying that his own reads count for nothing. This is how scum talks.
I was merely questioning what Hiraki was trying to get after, I think you might be reading a bit too much into this. And it's nice playing with you again Nik.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Robo wrote:Again. Somebody said, "Whatever you want me to be babe." Somebody said, " I plead the fifth". Yet my answer is somehow wrong?
It's not that your answer is necessarily wrong, it's how you worded it that's throwing up red flags. I actually don't like Amor's response more than yours, "I plead the 5th?" Really? A simple no would've done fine.
Unvote
Vote: Amor
I'm also concerned how projectmatt didn't raise an eyebrow at Amor's comment.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
YoYoGuy435 wrote:I was looking over the thread and I figured I'd go ahead and bring this to everyones attention. After I pointed out Hiraki and Toro's buddying on page 2 they stopped talking to each other about anything. I'm not sure if this means anything but I figured I'd point it out just in case it does mean something.
If you considered that buddying I don't really know the definition of buddying in this game anymore. Where did you see Hiraki and I scumhunt together? Sure we compared ideas on Robo's answer to the 3rd question but other then that it was off-topic nonsense between us.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
And scum would also like it if barely any explanations were made so a confused town could pile votes on eachother while scum can forge on under the radar.
*Squints eyes and points finger at Hiraki*ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki wrote:Fuck it.
I'm motivated. You want content? Give me a few days. I'll require a quicklynch after I'm done with Robo.
Fucking using semantics in a fucking post fucking pisses me off.
Fucking.
@KCDA: I see what you mean, but I haven't had anything that I've needed to say yet.
With this, I'm going to have to say everything because I'm putting all my cards on the table to get Roboscum out.
Get ready for this fucking wall.
And before anyone posts a fucking image.
Yes. I am mad.
OfT: I think he's mad.
Ont: Posting your reasons sure as hell looks better than not posting your reasons.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
(After giving the game a much needed read-through)
Unvote
Vote: Hiraki
Why are you delaying your wall? Unless this thing will be a wall that will put future walls to shame I don't quite see the reason why you're delaying it. And why are you trying to rush? So far I have not seen anything particularily scummy from Robo except the fact that he seems tunneled on silavor. Other then that I see no other reasons why you should be asking everybody to vote Robo to finish the day off.
Something else I've noticed, matt, why haven't you posted the answers to the questions you posed to everyone back on Page 1? In particular I want to know how long you've been playing mafia for.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Clear sarcasm, but I'm not saying that you should avoid Hikari, I'm saying that it's illogical to suspect him for not doing a wall as soon as he possibly can. If he never supplies the wall, then fine, deal with him. I also don't think a pressure vote is going to do anything, given that even if he is mafia he can (very clearly) fake a rage. I don't see how tells are going to be gathered if you claim it's a pressure vote, and I don't see how it's logical to lynch Hikari for waiting two days to make an apparently great post. Let's wait for this post.
It felt odd to me how he said it wasn't really necessary at this point, unless I'm interpreting it wrong. He also said he didn't feel like doing it today, sounds like delaying to me. Which makes me wonder how did he turn to this...
No, it's because I don't have time. Your piss poor pressure vote is piss poor.
How did he make the jump to not feeling like doing it to I don't have any time? If he said earlier he didn't have any time to make it today I would've been perfectly fine with that and I wouldn't have tacked on my vote.
Nik wrote:If you haven't caught on yet, I want to lynch Toro for being opportunistic for voting Hiraki for 'delaying his wall' for like one real-life day.
It appeared as if he was delaying, see above. I'm still interested in what he has to say though, and relax...it's L-4, he's in no danger it was merely a pressure vote, not a vote putting him in danger of lynching. If a bandwagon appears out of nowhere (doubt it) I'll remove my vote as I want to see his reasoning.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
LadyHaHa wrote:He can delay all he wants, page 6 is really too early to have enough to post a real wall.
/nod
I really don't know how big he expects this wall to be after just 141 posts.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Unvote
Thatwasworth the wait. Couple bits of analysis here from both yours and silavor's walls.
silavor wrote:Robo wrote:VOTE: Toro
Scum are always excited to play. Meaning they check the game a lot. Since he was first. He obviously was checking a lot. And so on.
Meaning, that he is scum. Or she.
That is my reasoning. Yes. Yeppers.
(Also, Nice flavor, I was amused.)
Excessive punctuation implies nervousness, insecurity, and excitement. Town have no reason to be this jittery eight posts in.
I think you're reaching a bit here, this post sounds more of a generic RVS vote.
silavor wrote:But more to the point, why do you keep asking me to find your scumbuddy? This isn't your first game, you should know that finding scumpairs when no one has flipped is a useless venture. You know who tries to get the town to fly away on useless ventures? Scum! You're trying to wifom your way out of suspicion by passive-aggressively stating that if we can't find your partner you simply can't be scum because we can't find your partner. That is a ridiculous argument, and honestly, town simply wouldn't be that petty.
Interesting catch you had there sil.
silavor wrote:Once again, admitting you're scummy doesn't make you any less of a scum. It certainly doesn't make you any more of a town. You've had all this time to scumhunt, to look over what's been said, to take a side on anything that doesn't involve you, and yet all you can do is try to defend yourself against anyone who looks your way. I love the AtE at the end there, by the way. So touching. It almost brought a tear to my eye, the poor plight of a defenseless scumbag.
Another good point, I noticed the tunneling earlier as well.
Robo 147 wrote:Those were their FULL posts too! I didn't just cut the votes out of the quote, I posted the FULL quote!
I doesn't matter if I am town or If I am scum, nobody is even realizing how unfair this is to me.
So look Nikanor.
Heres the thing.
You guys got nothing on me.
Besides the want to just lynch me.
And when I flip, its not even going to matter to you guys.
You aren't thinking, you are just doing.
For the sake of doing.
Just flipping coins.
This post will be used against me.
Now, I'm going to go back and read the game.
You notice here (in bold) how it sounds as if he's almost 100% certain that he is to be lynched this phase? Sounds to me as if we've got panicked scum on the run. I used to sound like this when I was getting bandwagoned back in my newbie days on an off-site forum I used to play on, I exhibited this type of play when I was townscum. Now keep in mind I did that as a newbie, Robo's been playing (at least on this site) for 18 months now, surely an experienced player knows how to defend themself better than this and not to cave in so easily.and
---------------------------------
Now onto Hikari's wall.
Hikari wrote:Robo wrote:I'll be one of the Mature ones and answer the questions normally. This is why I initially voted.
This seems like scum saying, "lol i can get town points by not lying"
Actually, upon reviewing this Robo post with his answer to #3, he's definitely taken a sharp turn south on my list.
Hiraki wrote:Robo is an experienced player. He has modded, and played well in different games. If this was a newbie/semi-experienced player I might let it slide.
Let me make this extremely clear. When you are playing town, you are playing to your mod given win-con.
Lynch scum.NOTlook like a townie. Looking like a townie is how scum win. They don't hunt scum.
This is going too much into theory now though, so that's enough on this topic.
/nod
The experienced player part of this is definitely striking me as suspicious of him with his seemingly throwing in the towel in his 147.
Hiraki wrote:He's crumbling under pressure.
And that's all I got.
Sure as hell looks like it.
Hiraki wrote:Along with point 1, this is scumRobo crumbling under pressure. Also, there's hints all around of Roboscum becoming annoyed at my word use.The word confirmed shouldn't intimidate a townie so much. A townie knows that they aren't confirmed scum, and should have that notion. I can't see Robotown coming out of this.
/nod at bold.
YoYoGuy wrote:After reading Hiraki's wall I do see Robo's scumminess but I don't exactly want to vote for him yet seeing as (I think) he's almost half-way to a hammer and I'd like to see his response to this wall before I make my decision.
The evidence is all there for me, he sure as hell seems paranoid, too paranoid for a townie.
Vote: Robocoptor87ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Kcdaspot wrote:robo comes out swinging with no logic what-so-ever. just "bring it on" and now he gives up?
There's no way an experienced townie would just give up like the way he has.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki 268-270 wrote:EMPKING.
YOU ARE MY SAVIOR.
BECAUSE WE BASICALLY AGREE ON EVERYTHING.
Was this in regards to this game or just across the forum in general?
silvalor 288 wrote:Now tell me, what's wrong with only focusing on one person at a time? I only have one vote, it's not like I can lynch multiple people in a day. Moreover, finding connections between people doesn't work that well if no one's flipped yet. What was the point of this exercise exactly?
You can still focus on more than one person if you're sitting and taking notes on the game as it progresses, tunneling on only one person in-thread is anti-town.
Amor 291 wrote:"He never sid I was town, he just said I wasn't scum." What?
That's puzzling me as well.
Robo 292 wrote:To the first question. Thats what he said. He never said I was town. He just said I wasn't scum. Simple as that. Its a null read for the points given is what he is saying. Or at least, thats what I'm getting from his posts. Hes saying what I posted a second ago, "Just because a player acts badly does not mean you should lynch them"
If you're not scum you must be town in this game, there's no third faction.
Hiraki 298 wrote:SECOND WIND?
FUCK.
THIS MEANS HE CAN'T BE SCUM.
UNVOTE
I'm fairly sure that scum doesn't want to die on D1 Hiraki.
YYG 302 wrote:because this is a very anti-town policy. You should never intentionally get rid of townies. No matter how stupid they are, because in the process of you lynching the VI, you've essentially given the mafia a free night, and increased the mafia's chance of winning.
I have to agree with this, you don't want to lynch off VI's for being VI's as there's always a stronger chance of you lynching off a townie. However, playing like a VI in the thread can actually benefit the scum. Scum DOESN'T want to kill off genuine VI's (Robo is not one of these) as they're not as effective playing-wise and scum would want to keep them around.
EMPKing 308 wrote:Vote: Robo - Sorrry, Hikari, I've seen scum give up but then grab at a glimmer of hope before.
Hiraki 309 wrote:Link it.
It's not such a farfetched idea Hiraki, scum's playing for the win also. Robo's earlier attempt at trying to get pity from the town obviously wasn't working, so he's now trying to play as a competent townie to try and alleviate the pressure. This strategy could go either way on the town/scum spectrum so I've got my eyes glued to the screen waiting for his defense.
Something I've just noticed regarding Kcdaspot, I've been reading his past couple of posts and it seems as if he's conveniently tunneled on Robo, you could argue "Hey Toro but he's got his vote on him." It doesn't matter, town wouldn't spend all of their time looking at just one guy. It appears to me as if he's being more of a follower than trying to show initiative.
For example...
KCD ISO 16 wrote:guys.. if hiraki's wall doesn't come by 8pm CT...
pressure wagon?
Why do you need our approval to start a pressure wagon? Scared that people will deem you anti-town?
The tunneling and the rush to get Robo lynched is also throwing up red flags for me as well. That goes for Matt as well.
IGMEOY: Kcdaspot and ProjectmattShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Kcdaspot wrote:Toro wrote:
For example...
KCD ISO 16 wrote:guys.. if hiraki's wall doesn't come by 8pm CT...
pressure wagon?
Why do you need our approval to start a pressure wagon? Scared that people will deem you anti-town?
The tunneling and the rush to get Robo lynched is also throwing up red flags for me as well. That goes for Matt as well.
IGMEOY: Kcdaspot and Projectmatt
also reason i asked? i didn't want to be alone in it. if no one voted with me i'd look stupid. also was a gauge to see how everyone felt of hiraki at the time. i mean we were all just twiddleing thumbs one of the only things to talk of isshould we put pressure on hiraki if he's late.
Common Mafia sense says yeah.
i WOULD imagine 1 or 2 people would be with me but i had to be sure that either A) a clumsy hammer wouldn't happen
I couldn't possibly imagine a whole mudslide of votes going onto Hiraki, so I disagree with you that we would've had7votes on Hiraki by then. Whoever hammered would have to be a complete moron.
or B) there WAS GOING to be enough pressure on the wagon. also would "encourage" hiraki to complete his task though in hindsight it could have affected the quality of the wall. but eh, none-the-less he delivered and none of that happened so... yeah.
But what troubles me is that you're asking for more votes on Hiraki when he already had3votes on him at the time, that's enough to be considered a pressure wagon to me. And if you added your vote we would've been at L-3, and that's a decent sized pressure wagon. So why call for further votes? It seems like you're wishing to have gotten as many votes on Hiraki as possible, potentially creating a situation where an accidental hammer could occur.
Robo 326 wrote:Its what you said.
Go go gadget reach.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Empking wrote:Toro wrote:I still don't get how 3rd/4th person on a wagon is a scumtell, the wiki article didn't elaborate. Anyone wanna clue me in?
Helps the wagon along while not putting yourself out there.
Yeah but with this reasoning couldn't 5th or 6th be considered scumtells as well?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
projectmatt wrote:
Also, yes, I do think Robo is panicking. Look at his last freaking post and tell me that isn't tunnel vision. Tell me.
That's not tunnelvision, that's answering back to the guy posing questions towards him. And while I think that's scummy for the way he misrepped EMP, it's not strictly tunnel-vision. For a guy who has a second wind, Robo's not really showing me proof of it. He's defending himself yes but he's doing a rather bad job at it. Still waiting for him to reply to the walls.
matt 343 wrote:Hikari - if you want to derail the Robocopter lynch, who else would you lynch today?
Yes, going back down to L-2 (and going back up to L-1) is considered derailing.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Empking wrote:Toro wrote:Amor wrote:It's a really old wiki tell that AFAIK no one takes seriously anymore.
I'm surprised anybody EVER took it seriously.
If it catches scum why not take it seriously?
The way I see it there's always a 4:1 - 5:1 ratio of town being the 3rd or 4th vote, it's a scum-catching tactic that just doesn't add up to me in the end. If this was legitimately a good scum-catching technique then we'd have no lynch after no lynch due to players being too scared to vote as they could be deemed scum. If people were getting caught as scum just by being the 3rd/4th vote then I'd deem that coincidental.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Nikanor wrote:silavor wrote:Same question for Nikanor. What makes YoYo a better lynch than robo? Why were you desperate to not have the town lynch robo while you were sick?
Why are we discussing theory?
Great question. I was just confused re: 3rd or 4th vote and it's relation to scumminess.
Still not convinced that Robo's a VT.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki wrote:
Because he has produced nothing worthwhile.Amor wrote:Hiraki, can you explain why you're thinking he might be scum again?
Yes, for a guy who's had a second wind he's certainly not showing it, what with the misrepping and everything.
[quote="Hiraki"While the initial thought of defending while admitting under substantial hatred, also known as not giving up, sounds very townie, doing nothing makes it worthless.[/quote]
/nod.
I haven't seen much of an improvement from him.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
projectmatt wrote:It's not a second wind if the coming back to defend himself still consists of misreps and faulty arguments. No.
Toro
That's not tunnelvision, that's answering back to the guy posing questions towards him.
Look AT his responses though. His responses are misreps and "NO U, YOU'RE SCUM". It's tunelling\OMGUS'ing when it feels like he's just calling his attacker scum out of spite.
Kdca, other then Robo, who do you feel is likely scum?
Eh, I see that more as an OMGUS.
So Toro, first you say that whoever might have hammered Hiraki would have had to be a moron and that you couldn't possibly imagine a bunch of votes accumulating. But then you bring up the possibility of an accidental hammer. Am I missing something here, or do these two sentiments not mesh?
I couldn't possibly imagine it happening, doesn't mean it couldn't happen.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Vote: Hiraki
Something feels off to me regarding his flip-floppiness yesterday. (Going off his ISO)
Hiraki 47 wrote:SECOND WIND?
FUCK.
THIS MEANS HE CAN'T BE SCUM.
UNVOTE
To me, this post here doesn't feel very sincere at all with him wanting to take his vote off.
Hiraki 48 wrote:EWBOP:
AND BEFORE SOMEONE GOES ON AND SAYS, "lol Hiraki he's trying to screw wit u"
SHOW ME ANOTHER GAME WHERE SOMEONE HAS GIVEN UP, AND LATER TRIED TO STAND UP FOR THEMSELVES, AND WAS STILL SCUM.
I DARE YOU.
Let's just say EMP's not the only one who has experienced this.
Hiraki 51 wrote:ROBO.
I GIVE YOU UNTIL FRIDAY 11:59 EST.
PROVE ME WRONG AGAIN.
Wrong...again? Prior to this you called for the hammer on Robo.
Hiraki 52 wrote:Because.
Does it really matter?
Here he tries to brush off the reasons for him jumping off the wagon.
Hiraki 53 wrote:And I've explained the flipflopping.
If I didn't then I'd agree with you.
But I did.
I want Robo to prove to me(us) that he's town.
He explained the flipfloppiness with really bad reasoning, ithappen.does
And why the sudden change of heart? He had prior been hoping to rush D1 with the lynch of Robo, as seen in his ISO #19 (19!) Andnooooowhe wants a reasoning from him. This doesn't sit right with me at all.
-------------------------------
I believe the reasoning that Hiraki jumped off of the wagon was that he knew Robo would flip town and didn't want it to appear like he was the one pushing hardest for his lynch, deflecting most of the attention onto silavor, YYG, and Empking.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki wrote:
Toro wrote:To me, this post here doesn't feel very sincere at all with him wanting to take his vote off.
That's why I used all caps, used Fuck, and said Second Wind.
HMMM.
Most. convincing. argument. ever.
From my POV it appeared as if you were being either sarcastic about your unvote or completely insincere.
Hiraki wrote:Toro wrote:Let's just say EMP's not the only one who has experienced this.
And you didn't post a game...because?
A.) The site where I used to play is now down.
B.) I can't do that at the moment w/o receiving some sort of punishment for it.
Hiraki wrote:Toro wrote:Wrong...again? Prior to this you called for the hammer on Robo.
This was my only real mistake.
I highly doubt Robo was going to say anything good either.
Yet you took off your vote and planned on giving him time to defend himself (until Friday mind you.) If you highly doubted Robo could produce anything to defend himself why offer him a window of time to do so? I also find it troubling for someone who wanted to give Robo a second chance, you HAMMERED him.
Hiraki wrote:Toro wrote:He explained the flipfloppiness with really bad reasoning, it does happen.
Your point?
You claim that having a second wind and coming back to defend yourself is strictly a town tactic, from some previous experiences of mine, it's not.
Hiraki wrote:Toro wrote:And why the sudden change of heart? He had prior been hoping to rush D1 with the lynch of Robo, as seen in his ISO #19 (19!) And nooooow he wants a reasoning from him. This doesn't sit right with me at all.
Do you think I didn't want reasoning for actions of someone that I wanted to lynch?
Did you not try to rush the D1 lynch?
Hiraki ISO 19 wrote:I'M FEELING REALLY GOOD NOW.
LET'S GET THIS OVER WITH.
Hiraki wrote:My vote is much better here.
Unvote, Vote: Toro
Go ahead. Pull the OMGUS card. Do it.
It's OMGUS, do you have a legitimate reason for voting me?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Nikanor wrote:First of all, there are multiple scum groups, so regardless of Hiraki's alignment, he couldn't have known that Robo was going to flip town.
Agh shit, keep forgetting that we've got two scumgroups against us. Speaking of which, what are the numbers now? 3:2 town?
Nikanor wrote:Second of all, Hiraki's unvote had good reasoning behind it.
But earlier in the day he wanted Robo dead, right then and there. The change of heart he had is scummy as hell.
Nikanor wrote:Thirdly, Toro's case is terrible, and he's probably scum.
Unvote. Vote: Toro.
Please elaborate.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Empking wrote:Unvote- Cpmpromise to my favourite player with votes. Hikari is really, really town.
Vote: Toro
Please elaborate. How do you view Hiraki as town?
Also reason-less bandwagoning, noted.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Nikanor wrote:Ald wrote:My problem is that you're aware of the oddities that having multiple scum groups creates, but ignore the fact that terrible cases should be nulltells since both scum and town have motivation to build up strong cases against scum.
You're wrong. Scum have motivation to build any kind of case against people who aren't them.
I don't really think that Kcda is scum.
Actually Alduskkel is right, with two scum factions one will always be trying to take out the other. It's not as if they're plotting together to eliminate all of the town, I guarentee they're more focused on eliminating eachother first. Think of it, Fire/Ice would always be trying to eliminate Ice/Fire so they can decrease the chances of getting NK'd themselves at night.
PEdit: What was your case on Hiraki?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
It's time for an active reading post.
----------------
Hiraki, I'm still interested in who your case was based on?
silavor 431 wrote:Nikanor, what about Toro's case makes you think he's scum?
I'm still waiting on an answer to this as well.
Empking 435 wrote:Projectmatt Vote somebody in your next post.
Interesting. Don't allow him to catch up and post his thoughts? Just flatout vote someone?
Alduskkel 438 wrote:Mafia are NK immune people.Get it right, this is an open game.
I THINK Kcdaspot's "scumminess" can be attributed to his playstyle. Recent town meta
Hiraki, are you going to address the votes against you at all? A defense, maybe?
Not in this game Dusk. (Bolded)
I'll agree to Kcdaspot's meta, I went through some of his past/current games and his posting style is the same, his meta's still a nulltell to me.
Alduskkel 443 wrote:So... no-kill or Doctor protection. Probably the latter.
/nod. Either of the mafia teams not sending in a kill N1 sounds ridiculous.
Empking 444 wrote:Or (unlikely I'd say unless YoYo claimed and I missed it) both targetted the same player. Its pretty useless whatever it was though.
If this were the case there'd be no kill.
silavor 453 wrote:Hmm. I don't really notice a difference between TownKCDA and ScumKCDA. TownKCDA's more active, but his wagon was slower and more drawn out in that town game, so it might've simply been that he had more time to reply to things.
/nod
projectmatt 457 wrote:I'm back.
Going to be posting my thoughts soon after a longer re-read. If I vote KDCA or Toro all votes would be in.
Three votes are currently on Toro - four on Hikari, if I vote for Toro, would it force a NL or would the day remain until the deadline is up and nobody has changed? And same question for a vote on KDCA. Not feeling the Hikari wagon, will point out why shortly.
If you voted for me there wouldn't be a no-lynch, where'd you get that idea? If you're not feeling the Hiraki wagon why are you automatically planning on voting for me? Because I'm the next highest wagon?
Hiraki 458 wrote:Unvote, Vote: Nikanor
I'm going to need to explain this, no?
Erhagkele.
/nodShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
projectmatt wrote:Toro wrote:
If you voted for me there wouldn't be a no-lynch, where'd you get that idea? If you're not feeling the Hiraki wagon why are you automatically planning on voting for me? Because I'm the next highest wagon?
You've misunderstood.
Looks at your 464, ah I see.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
silavor wrote:projectmatt wrote:I'm back.
Going to be posting my thoughts soon after a longer re-read. If I vote KDCA or Toro all votes would be in.
Three votes are currently on Toro - four on Hikari, if I vote for Toro, would it force a NL or would the day remain until the deadline is up and nobody has changed? And same question for a vote on KDCA. Not feeling the Hikari wagon, will point out why shortly.
I still don't get this post. Having all votes in has nothing to do with forcing a no lynch, and it's not like the rest of our votes are set in stone.
If this were the case we would've already been on D3 by now.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Empking wrote:Unvote- Pointing out bad play wrt Hikari rather than scummy play.
Vote: PM
/so much facepalm
warranted your vote!? He's not even voting for Hiraki! And what is this now, your third different vote this day phase with little to none (and bad) reasoning?ThatShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Empking wrote:Toro wrote:Empking wrote:Unvote- Pointing out bad play wrt Hikari rather than scummy play.
Vote: PM
/so much facepalm
warranted your vote!? He's not even voting for Hiraki!That
Yes his active lurking warranted the vote. You find active lurking a null tell or town tell?
I find active lurking to be neither null or towntells imo.
If his active lurking warranted your vote, than why not point that out when you were casting your vote?!FoS: EmpkingShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki 481 wrote:I see Toro scum now.
Easy.
And you don't even elaborate, not like I really expected you to.
silavor 487 wrote:I'm so confused.
Hiraki. You're not making any sense. Your issue with Nikanor boils down to... he didn't post a real case? If your evidence is a misrep, why bother stating it in the first place?
Because he's flailing caught scum.
Hiraki 488 wrote:I'm making a lot of sense.
It's not that Nikanor didn't post a real case. Did you read it?
I stated it in the first place as a mistake.
No, you're not making sense. Barely anything you've done in this game has made any sense at all.
Hiraki 496 wrote:Empking is not happening.
He's me buddy. <3
If he's your buddy, defend him.
Silavor 510 wrote:Hiraki, I am disappoint. You mean to say you've forgotten about that game already?
Notice how Empking makes cases there, how he replies using logic, and how there's a coherency to his thought pattern. Notice now how all three of those things are missing from his play this game.
/noted.
Anyone who can't see the contrast between the Empking of THAT game and the Empking of THIS game is blind.
Hiraki 511 wrote:not really.
Ladies and gentlemen, I've found our blind man.
Kcdaspot 513 wrote:i wanna lynch hiraki thoo....
Then keep your vote on him, simple concept really.
------------------------------------------
In conclusion, I am willing to hammer Empking as his play has not been town-like whatsoever throughout the game thus far. However, I want to have him at least try and defend himself. If his reasoning is garbage than I will hammer.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Empking wrote:
Also, my second vote included reasoning. You may disagree with it but its quite clearly got my reasoning for it. To help us not go the Hikari route. GTherefore Amor and MPR are both lying when they claim it did not include reasoning.
From how it reads it appears as if there's no reasoning...
Unvote
Vote: Toro - Cpmpromise to my favourite player with votes. Hikari is really, really town.
All you claim is that Hiraki is town, there's no real reasoning there. Your vote is trying to (and badly) defend Hiraki, there's no motivation towards why you're votingme.
Can I point out how fast my wagon has grown. Its totally a scum wagon (Not saying I'm town because it could be due to bussing.)
I have no doubt there's some scum players on this wagon, most likely whichever mafia team you're not on. And you're not saying you're town? What?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
MehPlusRawr wrote:okay Emp just called himself scum we can lynch him now
That's exactly how I read it. There's no hidden meaning in what I said. Empking's attempt to defend himself hasn't come off as a real townly way of doing so, voting me just to defend Hiraki? Absolutely terrible reasoning. He hasn't even gone into why he believes Hiraki is town, and his reasoning for voting me is still absolute garbage. This along with the meta silvalor provided are enough evidence for me, Empking must hang today.
Unvote
Vote: EmpkingShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
silavor wrote:Toro wrote:YOU [Hiraki] HAVE NEVER DEFENDED EMPKING NOR HAVE YOU EVER ATTEMPTED TO.
waitwut
For a guy who's been adamantly calling out Empking as town, he's only claimed that this is his normal town meta, which you disproved. That has been the only time I haveeverseen Hiraki try to defend Emp. Other then that he's done nothing.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Toro wrote:MehPlusRawr wrote:He hasn'tdefendedempking, he's just said "FUCK YOU GUYS EMP IS TOWN."
Exactly. If Hiraki claims Empking's town Hiraki should prove it, Hiraki hasn't and that's a fact.
Edited quote to avoid confusion.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki wrote:why am I supposed to defend someone else?
You'd accuse me to be his buddy for defending him.
And you know that.
For God's sake, let me rephrase itagain.How is Empking town? How Hiraki? How!?
Toro.
I will make sure you die tomorrow.
Regardless of what Empking flips, even though it will be town.
(loluknothatbecuzurscum)
If I were scum how would I know Emp would flip town? Why couldn't Emp flip the other scumteam?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki wrote:I'm going to let him flip.
And then let the room become silent.
Then we'll see how he's town.
No, if he's town and you knew he was town this whole time you should've posted evidence that could've prevented his lynch. He hasn't played like a townie this whole game, now post your proof. You remaining silent suggests that you don't have proof that he's town, you just flailing your arms proclaiming he's town isn't helping you at all.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki wrote:Hiraki wrote:not really.
He was at L-3.
Hiraki wrote:FFS.
Toro dies tomorrow.
Lynch happens, after Toro hammer.
hmmzorz.
wonder why I didn't bother in trying to defend him at the moment.
Or y'know.
Why he didn't.
FFS. Empking didn't even claim did he?
You've still never bothered to defend him while the pressure on him was building up, why?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Still doesn't change the fact that you haven't provided a reason why you think he's town, you're just flailing your arms proclaiming him town and calling everyone idiots who doesn't think what you think.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Nikanor wrote:silavor wrote:How is switching off at the last second town? It's scummy in any other game, null-scummy here because of the dual scum teams. There's nothing obvtown or megatown about it.
How the hell is jumping OFF of a well-established wagon on town scummy? I thought that staying ON the wagon with poor reasoning was scummy.
He jumped off the wagon (that was on a townie) and gave a decent reason for why he was doing it. He even made a case that caused at least two people to jump onto the Robo wagon. It would have been easy for him, as scum, to ride the wagon to a lynch. He did the hard thing, so he's town.
Strongly disagree. From the way he did it it sounded as if he tried distancing himself from the wagon so it appeared that he had a premonition about Robo being town and he was right about it, and don't forget he did this with really cruddy reasoning.ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Hiraki wrote:Toro.
Let's be logical here.
If Empking was scum, why would he talk here?
Oh I see what this is, this is another "ROBO'S GOT A SECOND WIND HE MUST BE TOWN!!!" thing isn't it?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0- Toro
-
Toro Goon
- Toro
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 851
- Joined: July 15, 2009
- Location: Chicago, IL
Empking wrote:Toro wrote:Hiraki wrote:Toro.
Let's be logical here.
If Empking was scum, why would he talk here?
Oh I see what this is, this is another "ROBO'S GOT A SECOND WIND HE MUST BE TOWN!!!" thing isn't it?
This is evidence that Toro isn't focussing on scumhunting. Even if it was a fair comparison then he was right the first time.
This suggests nothing of the sort. Are you suggesting he's not right this second time around?ShowOverall Record: 4-4
Scum: 3-1
Town: 1-3
Indy: 0-0 - Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro
- Toro