IceGuy wrote:Does everybody agree that we should claim whom we protected N0?
Yes, I agree.
Anyway, RVS VOTE: jilynnne1991
IceGuy wrote:Does everybody agree that we should claim whom we protected N0?
Empking wrote:DonJosh wrote:Empking wrote:DonJosh wrote:I protected popsofctown
Why?
Same as IceGuy, just random
Vote: Don
Empking wrote:Sathoris wrote:Empking wrote:I voted Don because scum are more likely to not put thought in who they'd like to protect.
If you'd said that the first time I'd be okay with it, but still. Why don over iceguy? Both seem to randomly chose someone to protect.
1.Don did it second
2. Ice is generally useful
Where do you see me presuming don is town? That sentence had the emphasis on your reasoning for a vote instead of Don's innocence in receiving a vote.
You presumed Don had the ability to protect.
IceGuy wrote:DonJosh:
- Why did you post whom you protected, but not your justification?
- Why do you think Empking is scum?
Sathoris:
- Why this post? You didn't choose your target randomly.
- Why did you defend DonJosh against Empking's attacks?
Anyway, VOTE: Sathoris mostly because of gut feeling, andFoS: DonJosh.
Empking wrote:izakthegoomba wrote:How is it lying nonsense? Scum could easily have taken some time to deliberate over their fake protect-claim.
Wow, so its gone from "will" to "could". Somebody's scum aren't they?
Empking wrote:DonJosh wrote:Empking wrote:DonJosh wrote:I protected popsofctown
Why?
Same as IceGuy, just random
Vote: Don
Empking wrote:DonJosh wrote:Also, I just realized that Empking and I both protected the same person.
Nice fluff from Don "Protests too much about OMGUS" Josh.
Empking wrote:izakthegoomba wrote:Yeah, so he's not as big a contributor as some of us. But if you're going to have a go at people for that, take a look at Uncle Pain. Or forest_air. Or popsofctown. Or jilynne. All of them have been less use than Don. So misrep or no misrep, you are again doing this horribly wrong.
Posting fluff > Posting nothing in the scumminess stakes.
Even if it wasn't its own post the randomness and irrelevance would still be scummy. Give me a town motive for posting it.
izakthegoomba wrote:DonJosh wrote:I posted it to see if you would nitpick about it and avoid my real points, which you did. Give me a response to the posts before the "fluff"
Oshit, missed that. No. Not buying that. Emp, I still read you as scum, but I agree that Don is trying to find a reason after doing it.
The only big thing that gave me a town read on Don was that Emp is scummy and Emp had no good points on Don, so it didn't look like bussing. Now there is a real point against him, the read vanishes.
I want to see his reaction before I put a vote down (on anyone) again.
Sathoris wrote:DonJ:
If it really was a trap why didn't you say so in your first post responding to Empking's quote of said 'trap'?
In post #78 you accuse Empking of ignoring your other posts and later in post #90 you proclaim it was a trap in which you would see if Empking avoided your other posts. Why not mention your 'trap' in your first post because Emking aparently did precisely as you'd hoped. Surely it would have been a better time to inform us about your trap then?
DonJosh wrote:Empking wrote:DonJosh wrote:Also, I just realized that Empking and I both protected the same person.
Nice fluff from Don "Protests too much about OMGUS" Josh.
Thought you would point that out. Ignore all my other posts and even avoid responding to them. Typical scum play.
DonJosh wrote:
I think Empking is scum because of his excessive attacks with BS reasoning. For example:
Empking wrote:izakthegoomba wrote:How is it lying nonsense? Scum could easily have taken some time to deliberate over their fake protect-claim.
Wow, so its gone from "will" to "could". Somebody's scum aren't they?
Sathoris wrote:You're not answering my question DonJ. I ask again, why didn't you said it was a trap in your first post? Cause I think you just made that up.
DonJosh wrote:Sathoris wrote:DonJ:
If it really was a trap why didn't you say so in your first post responding to Empking's quote of said 'trap'?
In post #78 you accuse Empking of ignoring your other posts and later in post #90 you proclaim it was a trap in which you would see if Empking avoided your other posts. Why not mention your 'trap' in your first post because Emking aparently did precisely as you'd hoped. Surely it would have been a better time to inform us about your trap then?
DonJosh wrote:Empking wrote:DonJosh wrote:Also, I just realized that Empking and I both protected the same person.
Nice fluff from Don "Protests too much about OMGUS" Josh.
Thought you would point that out. Ignore all my other posts and even avoid responding to them. Typical scum play.
Sathoris wrote:Not buying it. If it really was a trap then why the need to point it out later?
Sathoris wrote:Your 'trap' was really weak. Empking saying fluff was weak aswell, but you claiming it as some kind of trap is just awful. Your suspicion of me is laughable aswell? Just cause I'm voting for you?
DonJ needs to go.
Sathoris wrote:DonJosh wrote:Please tell me when I stated I found you suspicious.
Oh woops, that was Iceguy with the lame vote, sorry. Changes little though.
Sathoris wrote:
If DonJ flips quack then Empking is a doctor and seeing as I have a townread on Uncle and Pops the remaining scum must be Jylinne/Iceguy/Glowball or Jylinne and a combination of Izak and glowball or iceguy.
zMuffinMan wrote:I'd be in, I think I could improve on my performance in this game. I didn't do too well.