mini 282 Game Over

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #48 (isolation #0) » Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:46 pm

Fritzler again?

vote: Fritzler

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #50 (isolation #1) » Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:53 pm

Fritzler wrote:
Commodore Amazing wrote:Fritzler again?

vote: Fritzler

You're in this game?
sweet!

I cannot recall a time when Fritzler said "sweet!" and was town.

FoS: Fritzler

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #53 (isolation #2) » Mon Feb 06, 2006 4:00 pm

Whoa, wait, ziliu is in this game?

unvote: Fritzler, vote: ziliu

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #90 (isolation #3) » Wed Feb 08, 2006 7:05 am

CoolBot wrote:
atark wrote:Can we just lynch rocko to get him out of the way?
Nah, I'm waiting for that claim you're so carefully avoiding. With four votes, that's certainly enough to warrant one.

Are we getting a claim out of stark for any reason, or is it just because he was the first one to 4 votes?

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #106 (isolation #4) » Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:00 am

unvote: ziliu, vote: stark

I don't buy the "I don't want to claim stuff."

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #110 (isolation #5) » Thu Feb 09, 2006 8:35 am

So the scum has to kill you. You claiming is us better than wasting our lynch on you.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #113 (isolation #6) » Thu Feb 09, 2006 8:39 am

unvote: stark

Thinking...

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #122 (isolation #7) » Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:46 am

vote: MeMe

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #130 (isolation #8) » Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:09 pm

stark wrote:However, if Yosarian comes up innocent, my suspicions fall upon Alexander and MeMe.

Just skip the part about Yosarian2 and vote for MeMe.

She has

way

too

many

underlines

,

italics

, and smilies in her posts.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #197 (isolation #9) » Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:36 am

I'm going to let MeMe weigh in before I hammer. I'm not even sure I would hammer here; CoolBot is sort of convincing me not to.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #204 (isolation #10) » Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:41 am

Uh...

vote: Alexander

until I find out what happened with yesterday's lynch.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #224 (isolation #11) » Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:08 pm

@Alexander - Yesterday, your case against Yos seemed to be based on the fact that you thought he was scum with Astronaut. What's your case against him now?

MeMe wrote:
vote: SpamWise

Diverting us from Alexander? Why don't you weigh in on why you don't think that Alexander is scum?

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #246 (isolation #12) » Tue Feb 21, 2006 4:16 pm

I believe Alexander should be the first to claim today; I certainly haven't been convinced by all his wild arm waving.

Sorry, Alexander; I'm just not getting a good read on you either way. And the way you came into this day looked pretty scummy to me. You can't expect to get away without claiming.

I never get a read on CoolBot, though. I'd like MeMe to help out on that one. MeMe? You there?

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #312 (isolation #13) » Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:42 am

This game is hard to keep up with.

My thougts on some of the players -

rocko92, CoolBot, ziliu - probably not scum
Alexander - I still think this guy is scum, but he refuses to go down. He has done his homework, and he is putting in the effort, but I remain unconvinced that he's innocent.
MeMe - If the Alexander bandwagon is wrong, my guess is that she's a cop with a guilty on SpamWise, since no one else is paying attention to her except for me. I'm not a fan of how she added the last vote at the end of day one.
Fritzler - Nothing out of the ordinary.
Yosarian2 - No good read on him yet.
impossibleroot - If Alexander is scum, this guy is probably scum too. His defense of Alexander reminds me of my defense of Shteven in Married to Mafia.
SpamWise - Doesn't seem particularly scummy, but he's my first guess for scum if I'm wrong about Alexander.

@Alexander - You are going down. Claim before you go down.

Also, I need to take a good look at the stark bandwagon back there. I think I had a hand in that, so I apologize. But there must have been scum going on in there.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #318 (isolation #14) » Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:04 am

ziliu wrote:I'd like to suggest no-lynch, with 8 alive and (probably) 3 scum. Unless there is a cop that would like to share his/her results.

Probably a good idea.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #321 (isolation #15) » Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:30 pm

CoolBot wrote:I don't agree. With one kill per night, there are no competing scum groups to winnow out their numbers. So, buy no lynching, we are pretty much hoping there's a lucky vig out there.

Well, the big risk is that our information role will get killed at night. If we decide to go no lynch, our cop needs to consider if it's a good idea to come out with the information that he/she has right now.

I think we should have everyone check in and go no lynch after that.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #333 (isolation #16) » Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:02 am

I'll vote SpamWise on the condition that the vig kills MeMe if SpamWise isn't scum.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #336 (isolation #17) » Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:09 am

vote: SpamWise

I can go along with this.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #339 (isolation #18) » Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:27 am

@MeMe - More results?

unvote: SpamWise

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #341 (isolation #19) » Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:36 am

CoolBot wrote:What do you mean by more results. And why do you think there's a vig?

She should have more than one result by now.

And there's probably a vig. There's always a vig.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #343 (isolation #20) » Thu Mar 02, 2006 10:34 am

rocko92 wrote:
I guess we could no lynch. Or everyone could just

vote: SpamWise
i Agree
vote: spamwise

Wow. There sure are a lot of votes being thrown around for this being lylo.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #349 (isolation #21) » Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:55 am

CoolBot wrote:
Commodore Amazing wrote:here sure are a lot of votes being thrown around
Better than no lynch, which just dooms us to a slow death.

You're better than that, right? You know it's the best play to no lynch at 8 people with 3 scum left.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #352 (isolation #22) » Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:35 am

impossibleroot wrote:CA, aren't you worried that a no-lynch will lead to a lucky (for the Mafia) cop death with absolutely no claim or revelation? That, to me, would spell a much more likely town loss.

The cop doesn't seem to be coming out anyway. The cop probably has useless info.

If we lynch now and get it wrong, we lose. We've got a 3 in 8 chance of hitting scum. If we wait after no lynch, we have a 3 in 7 chance of hitting scum. I like the odds better after no lynch.

However, we probably have a vig who can take a shot if we mislynch, so we might still be around after that.

I wouldn't be opposed to mass claim either... at this point, the scum can probably figure out who has what roles.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #355 (isolation #23) » Sun Mar 05, 2006 5:44 pm

vote: no lynch

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #363 (isolation #24) » Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:33 am

SpamWise, Fritzler, and CoolBot. Anyone want to take those odds?

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #365 (isolation #25) » Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:58 pm

Fritzler wrote:fucking pussies

Dude, vote no lynch. Let's get this thing moving. Slacker.

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #371 (isolation #26) » Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:41 am

Commodore... dead?

Commodore Amazing · Post Post #414 (isolation #27) » Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:35 am

Commodore Amazing wrote:SpamWise, Fritzler, and CoolBot. Anyone want to take those odds?

So close!

Commodore Amazing wrote:
CoolBot wrote:
Commodore Amazing wrote:here sure are a lot of votes being thrown around
Better than no lynch, which just dooms us to a slow death.
You're better than that, right? You know it's the best play to no lynch at 8 people with 3 scum left.

I trust this was one of the mandatory scummy things?

And was MeMe's day one vote another? Bah; I'm not letting her get away with that again.

Good game, scum; I feel like you had a lot of townies confusing everything for you. It was hard to get a good read on any of you.