Imperial Intrigue (Endgame, OUT OF NOWHERE)

[David Xanatos]

Well, he's not in our chat, I can tell you that much.

If there are other members of House Argelev that have not made themselves known, I ask you to. I'd rather determine if we are the sole members or if we are simply the only members with a QT.

I do want to know what Shinki has "realised" though.

[MacDougall]

How many people are in your chat David?

[SleepyKrew]

Well gee how about you ACTUALLY VOTE MR FLYING UNDER RADAR IS SCUMMY BUT IM DOING IT ANYWAY
GOD IF I HAD MORE SHOTS

[MacDougall]

If you had more shots you'd kill more members of the town. What makes you so impervious to suspicion and criticism?

[SleepyKrew]

My awesomeness. You?

[David Xanatos]

That comeback.. with that avatar.. that was perfect.

Anyway. I don't know why he's been overlooked myself.. frankly his shot was suspect and his claim was too. "Macho BP Dayvig" is a contradiction in terms, almost.. he revises it later but revising a claim afterwards is dodgy as fuck anyway..

[SleepyKrew]

How is Macho BP Dayvig a contradiction?
And WTF do you mean I've been under the radar? I was L-2 need I remind you.

[David Xanatos]

Macho means cannot be protected by Docs, and similar protective roles.
BP means killing Night Actions don't work.

Therefore, you'd be claiming that you can't be protected from killing night actions, while being immune to them.

[David Xanatos]

Macho is a role modifier that prevents players from being protected from kills in any way.

Bulletproof is a role modifier that allows a player to avoid being killed at Night.

[SleepyKrew]

You didn't answer McDodger's question.

I claimed X-Shot BP. Meaning once I ran out of shots, I couldn't be protected. I'm dumb, but I know how to fake a claim.

[David Xanatos]

There's no reason to put even X-Shot BP on a Macho, as it's essentially saying that they don't need to worry about NKs, especially if X>=2. In addition, sticking that on a role like Dayvig is quite literally saying "The role with unblockable kills shall be unkillable on night 1-X".

Mac > No point answering that question. Anti-Town factions already know there are two of us, no sense confirming or extending the number without due cause.

[SleepyKrew]

That's stupid.

[David Xanatos]

So are your pants.

[SleepyKrew]

I'm naked.

[David Xanatos]

Stop getting us all excited. Obvious scum tactic, trying to distract us all!

[SleepyKrew]

Hey now.

[SleepyKrew]

Is Emp town? Why?
Why is vezok scum?

[SleepyKrew]

/notfluffthisissrsbsns

[David Xanatos]

You're a Rockstar?

Pedit: Not confident about Empking either way. Vezok does seem worse than usual to me though, and I'm wary of dismissing it as purely VI-ness. Empking can be valuable if he's Town, better to investigate.

[MacDougall]

Okay well this little teet-a-teet between you two has been played out ad nauseum.

vote: Shinki

for aforementioned reasons.

[SleepyKrew]

Emp is proving to be a liability...
vezok is Vigbait...

McDodger, WHYD YOU WAIT SO LONG U R SCUM

[David Xanatos]

Vezok is always classified as "vigbait". I don't think I've ever seen him vigged.

[SleepyKrew]

We're going to lynch him eventually. Just like gandalf. But a PL should be saved till later.
I'd prefer we don't shoot him yet, because he might be a PR.

[David Xanatos]

That's where I draw the line.

A PL sooner is better than a PL later, on the sheer basis that D1 we can afford a mislynch more than late-game. The longer Vezok is around, the longer he's a distraction. The only exception, and I mean the ONLY exception, is if he's a PR.

[SleepyKrew]

Would you like him to claim?
No?
Then kindly shut up.

We lynch scum D1. We get interactions. If we PL, then D1 would end up being useless