Imperial Intrigue (Endgame, OUT OF NOWHERE)

Empking · Post Post #176 (isolation #0) » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:19 am

Vote: DX

I can't believe so much of this was set up spec. Urgh.

Kdowns and Magua are town, along with DX that's alll I can tell.

Empking · Post Post #177 (isolation #1) » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:20 am

Who claimed the port house? They're prob scum too.

Empking · Post Post #201 (isolation #2) » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:32 am

In post 200, whispersilk wrote:The grammar in this statement suggests you think DX is town, yet you are voting for him. Can you clear this up, please?

I disagree with you plus I have a DX scum read.

Empking · Post Post #257 (isolation #3) » Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:26 pm

Unvote
Vote: SK

Empking · Post Post #265 (isolation #4) » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:02 pm

In post 262, SleepyKrew wrote:I am
The Motherfucking Entire Imperial Skyfleet, Loyalist Macho X-Shot Bulltetproof X-Shot Dayvig.

Flavor stuff:
I'm Macho because nobody can defend better than the Fleet.
I'm Bulletproof cause of armor.
I'm Dayvig cause of weaponnz.
Not revealing number of shots because that would be stupid.
I crumbed it when I "shot" Otolia, because "Death from above" is the Fleet's motto.

That's pretty clearly fake.

Empking · Post Post #331 (isolation #5) » Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:23 pm

In post 330, kdowns wrote:I doubt it, I am think possible One Shot Day Kill Scum Possibly if he was just throwing the kill around like that.

+1

Empking · Post Post #337 (isolation #6) » Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:47 pm

In post 332, Magua wrote:One-shot daykill scum keeps it for a claimed power role, not says, "Hey everyone, watch me kill this guy." Empking knows this.

1. I have never seen this.
2. We were both in Ooba's game and saw the dayvig confirm themselves rather than shooting a PR.

Empking · Post Post #357 (isolation #7) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:29 am

In post 339, Magua wrote:So in your world, about-to-be-lynched-SleepyKrew-scum uses up his dayvig because lolswhynot...and doesn't shoot the claimed vigilante? Doesn't shoot an experienced player not on his team like you or StrangerCoug, but shoots samantha?Mmmm. No.Espeonage in ASoIaF's play was also incredibly horribly bad (not just his dayvig play), which is part of the reason he, y'know, lost.

So yourt argument is essentially that SK is so much superior to Espionage + AGM that he couldn't possibly do the same tactic? Sorry, I don't buy that at all.

FOS: Magua

As it happens on sleeping on it I can't evenm remember why I went on SK.

So...

Unvote, Vote: DX

Empking · Post Post #360 (isolation #8) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:26 am

Unvote

Empking · Post Post #362 (isolation #9) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 4:01 am

Vote: Oto

Empking · Post Post #374 (isolation #10) » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:02 am

In post 370, Otolia wrote:
In post 369, Magua wrote:How do you think he's *not* playing to his wincon?

I have reasons to be he could have a special importance for me (considering some mechanics are not revealed to us). His WinCon definitely have a survive condition (even an shared one with the other claimant), so why he is bragging about being
the
heir when that is detrimental to his WinCon and the WinCon of the
Loyalists
?

I'm pretty sure this is a non-town claim.

Empking · Post Post #445 (isolation #11) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:57 am

In post 442, vezokpiraka wrote:Yeah.

We can lynch monk and david together for being scum.
"Third Legion Stormtroopers Allied to the true Heir of the Throne." - monk

I see neither loyalist nor House Argelev in your claim. You are scum my friend.

unvote vote monk

+1

Unvote, Vote: Monk

Empking · Post Post #452 (isolation #12) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:45 am

In post 447, David Xanatos wrote:Empking, read the end of Monk's post. "I have Factional Talk with David we are basically the House of Argelev from the west."

"Basically" is an important word there.

Also I've just noticed "Factional Talk" that sounds even more like a non-town claim.

Empking · Post Post #458 (isolation #13) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:08 am

The Factional is IGMEOY but I understand the basically now.

Unvote, Vote: Ot

Empking · Post Post #472 (isolation #14) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:56 am

In post 471, EtherealCookie wrote:He's continued to just randomly vote with little reasoning and jumping back and forth from wagon to wagon. And then his silly claim that SK is a scum-day vig who revealed himself by shooting a rather poorly played townie? Yeah right.

Where have you seen a scumdayvig plan any other way?

Empking · Post Post #474 (isolation #15) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:30 am

1. Hi EC
2. SK tried to solicit opinions for town cred so...
3. EC: That question is still wanting an answer from you. (And I meant play rather than plan.)

Empking · Post Post #476 (isolation #16) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:37 am

In post 475, Otolia wrote:
In post 458, Empking wrote:The Factional is IGMEOY but I understand the basically now.

Unvote, Vote: Ot

That was the most suspicious you ever done. Unless you are mixing this game with another one we are both in, you have absolutely no backing in your vote. And RVS is long gone now. So you better explained yourself on that.

I've said it before. I think the port claim was a scum claim.

Empking · Post Post #477 (isolation #17) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:40 am

I've just checked the flavour for D1: Can someone explain to me why we're not lynching the player who the flavour declares as "traitors"?

Empking · Post Post #487 (isolation #18) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:49 am

In post 483, Empking's Alt wrote:
In post 478, kdowns wrote:Because of this.. "
In post 3, Wraith wrote:

Please remember that flavor has NO BEARING on any players' role or alignment. Names used were chosen at random.

That is about the players in the flavour being random.

Magua: The army marching from the West. Monk.

EC: Hi was to Magua. It was sarcasm. Are you saying you can't answer my question?

PEdit: I'll look for the quote that game me my read on you.

In post 485, Empking's Alt wrote:Oh yeah. Your flavour matches DX suggesting you're not a Loyalist. You have claimed not be of House Arglelov (or whatever) making you non-town.

PEdIt: He asked for a vote. People just thought he was a liar.

Empking · Post Post #488 (isolation #19) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:50 am

EC: Yes the same thing.

Empking · Post Post #491 (isolation #20) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:00 am

In post 489, Otolia wrote:If you can't, then you voted for me in order to blend in and thus you are scum.

That's lolworthy. "You went out on a limb to vote a player no one else was voting to blend in."

You claimed to not be a loyalist.
You claimed not to be of the house of (whatever)
That is a scum claim.

Empking · Post Post #492 (isolation #21) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:01 am

Its not the port claim that's scummy. I just have a horrid problem with names and remembered the port part rather than the Delmar part.

Empking · Post Post #509 (isolation #22) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:38 am

Oto is deliberately misrepresenting me.

If Oto isn't a Loyalist and not of the right house then he's scum. Or in other words: He's scum.

Empking · Post Post #511 (isolation #23) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:44 am

Unvote

Empking · Post Post #515 (isolation #24) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:49 am

In post 513, Otolia wrote:
In post 509, Empking wrote:Oto is deliberately misrepresenting me.

If Oto isn't a Loyalist and not of the right house then he's scum. Or in other words: He's scum.

You want me to claim I am a Loyalist ? You bet I am. Now and ever, my alignment can't be change. And don't start to whine about misrepresentation you are a better player than that.

No I already said that I meant the Beran part than the port itself. And you were pretending otherwise, that's complete misrepresentation.

DX: I've seen nothing scummy from him.

Empking · Post Post #518 (isolation #25) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:01 am

In post 517, Magua wrote:@Empking: Hi. Now, mod complaining about the flavor aside (since the mod is in fact reinforcing what I've already been saying), when you were going on about the ports, did you believe that scum have no fakeclaims in this game? Or did you believe that scum were too stupid to use fakeclaims provided to them?

Honestly? I wasn't think about that.

Empking · Post Post #521 (isolation #26) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:24 am

"Who claimed the port

house

?"

Its the port

city

if you want to play it your way. I specifically said House.

Empking · Post Post #531 (isolation #27) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:08 am

In post 529, Otolia wrote:
In post 521, Empking wrote:"Who claimed the port
house
?"

Its the port
city
if you want to play it your way. I specifically said House.

Then what post made you write that, and how is this post (mentioning the '
port house
') made you vote for me ?

The post...where you claimed?

Empking · Post Post #533 (isolation #28) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:11 am

Claim your win condition as best you can. This is making sense to me.

Empking · Post Post #535 (isolation #29) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:25 am

In post 533, Empking wrote:Claim your win condition as best you can. This is making sense to me.

Oh I'm an idiot.

Fixed.

In post 533, Empking wrote:Gandalf:Claim your win condition as best you can. This is not making sense to me.

Empking · Post Post #546 (isolation #30) » Sat Sep 24, 2011 12:02 pm

Because House Delmar is not Algerov or similar to my role.

Empking · Post Post #622 (isolation #31) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:56 am

Heuy can people not vote me until we get another vote count. Thanks.

Empking · Post Post #628 (isolation #32) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:38 am

In post 626, Otolia wrote:
In post 622, Empking wrote:Heuy can people not vote me until we get another vote count. Thanks.

Translation : People don't hammer me before I can fake-claim.

Seriously?

Vote: Ot

- It seems like I was right for the wrong reasons.

Empking · Post Post #633 (isolation #33) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:22 am

You'd think a pretty hard softclaim would at least get a comment from the additional vote.

Imperial Military Intelligence - Loyalist Cop

Yay.

Empking · Post Post #637 (isolation #34) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:01 am

In post 636, gandalf5166 wrote:I am not a member of House Argelev either. I'm town for the moment. You can be a Loyalist without being Argelev(such as the colonists living in America who were still loyal to Britain during the revolution).

Yes but he suggested he wasn't a loyalist either.

Empking · Post Post #644 (isolation #35) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:04 am

In post 641, David Xanatos wrote:Oh, for the record, I'm inclined to believe Empking.

Emp, since you're outed, do you have someone in mind to scan (if so, don't say who), and if not, would you be willing to confirm either me and Monk, or otherwise be directed?

I have someone I want to investigate. if the will of the people is to overrule that with Monk then I can live with that.

Empking · Post Post #647 (isolation #36) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:15 am

In post 645, Otolia wrote:
In post 637, Empking wrote:
In post 636, gandalf5166 wrote:I am not a member of House Argelev either. I'm town for the moment. You can be a Loyalist without being Argelev(such as the colonists living in America who were still loyal to Britain during the revolution).

Yes but he suggested he wasn't a loyalist either.

You have either to stop lying or to start reading the thread.

In post 513, Otolia wrote:You want me to claim I am a Loyalist ? You bet I am. Now and ever, my alignment can't be changed.

This is unacceptable bullshit.
He suggested he wasn't a loyalist. (He said his PM was like DX's (implying that he too lacked the loyalist marker).)
He then decided to change his story.
That doesn't make me a liar.
Also: In a weird "coincidence" he decided to change his story after I unvoted him. Why was that Oto?

By the way, what you did wasn't a softclaim, it was just a maneuver to delay the claim. It's the thing scum are most inclined to do when they feel they will be lynch. You know it and it's a shame I can't prove that you know because it would need me to link an ongoing game.

This is bullshit. There is no ongoing game for him to link. He is straight up making stuff up and going "I'm not allowed to prove it

".

I wanted to claim when I needed to claim. That's completely null.

Empking · Post Post #649 (isolation #37) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:48 am

In post 648, SleepyKrew wrote:Emp, didn't you say my claim was fake when I claimed a group instead of a single person? Yeah no die.

Are you of the belief that I just made up this claim? In which case, surely you can just wait for me to be counterclaimed?
Or are you of the belief that I misread my role PM. Why is that scummy?

Empking · Post Post #651 (isolation #38) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:52 am

In post 650, SleepyKrew wrote:So you want to out the real cop (assuming we have one) on D1? NO

So you think the name I just made up happened to be the actual role I decided to claim? Really?

Empking · Post Post #652 (isolation #39) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:54 am

Look, what are the odds of all these being the case.
1. Scum not being given fake claims.
2. Scum not being groups.
&
3. Imperial Military Intelligence not being in the game.

I misread my role PM. Null null null.

Empking · Post Post #654 (isolation #40) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:57 am

In post 653, SleepyKrew wrote:PEDIT: When you questioned me being the Skyfleet, it was because you misread? What did you think you were?

I thought I was an agent in the Imperial Military Intelligence or an officer/spy rather than the whole thing.

Empking · Post Post #657 (isolation #41) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:00 am

In post 655, SleepyKrew wrote:Oh hey. It was Otolia that said I can't be people, not you. Explain.

Was that to me or him?

Empking · Post Post #659 (isolation #42) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:06 am

In post 658, SleepyKrew wrote:You.

I didn't mention it specifically because Ot had already mentioned it. It was part of the "obviously fake" and why I didn't just mention the bulletproof/macho contradiction.

Empking · Post Post #661 (isolation #43) » Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:14 am

In post 660, SleepyKrew wrote:You called it fake BEFORE Otolia did.
Furthermore, you never explained WHY it was fake.
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH

So? Of course I didn't explain it looked completely obvious.