In post 8, Fishythefish wrote:IIoA: Think about your last will, particularly at night. It's really, really important that votes go to townies.
Why do you feel it was necessary to state the obvious?
In post 8, Fishythefish wrote:IIoA: Think about your last will, particularly at night. It's really, really important that votes go to townies.
In post 17, Fishythefish wrote:In post 12, 4nxi3ty wrote:In post 8, Fishythefish wrote:IIoA: Think about your last will, particularly at night. It's really, really important that votes go to townies.
Why do you feel it was necessary to state the obvious?
vote: fishy
Why not? People are lazy, and some of them will forget their wills need maintenance at some point. Just because something's obvious doesn't mean people will remember it.
i'll take this deal, who do you suggest we powerlynch?In post 10, Nachomamma8 wrote:Alright, first thing you guys need to do is fix your wills and put me as your first option. Then, I'm going to powerlynch someone, my scumteam will kill one of you, and then we'll repeat the process.
Sound good?
In post 85, Lastsurvivor wrote:Malee's not giving me warm fuzzy towny feelings with this mess of a case on Nacho.
hiplop wrote:@everyone; Whats everyones thoughts on DDD, it just occurred to me that he is in this game, and he usually isnt this inactive is he? The posts he has made have been rather blah, too.
...malee was voting nacho for skimming and it never really got to the point of pushing for lynch.In post 139, Rhinox wrote:Does it make sense for scum-malee to push a case based on nacho voting vincent if she knew nacho didn't actually vote vincent?
DDD wrote:Can't say I'm really interested in a Malee wagon right now since I think the fundamental point she made was a sound one about Nacho.
Dislike Rhinox becuase of the very soft way he's been playing. There's absolutely no conviction in the arguments he was making; his "good point" from LS wasn't actually a good point and it was just the first i a set of panders towards LS that he mde.
alice wrote:Nacho makes an excellent point on funky. Also Kortul. Consider me persuaded, though I'll keep my vote on Malee for now. I'd probably be willing to switch to funky whenever
In post 187, 4nxi3ty wrote:I'm conflicted about lastsurvivor. some of his posting I find are exceedingly townish, others not so much
lastsurvivor wrote:Also, lampshading (warning tvtropes link may waste hours of your valuable time) the fact that you BW hopped doesn't really make it any less bad.
In post 243, Sleepless Assassin wrote:4n, nothing to say to my take on your ISO?
don't be ridiculous, I wouldn't be playing the game if I never had to defend myself. Just not a priority of mine to dispel every accusation thrown at me, especially when that person already has it cemented into their head that me and funkybile are scum.In post 249, Sleepless Assassin wrote:So... you . . . Don't defend yourself ever in a mafia game or...?
post288 wrote:Also got the vibe that rhinox was buddyingup to me earlier. And there was something about his 1v1 with last that bugged me that I can't quite remember, nothing to do with pandering though.
Lastsurvivor wrote:@4n: You have said that funky is probably town. Why?
In post 284, Nachomamma8 wrote:Unvote, Vote: Lastsurvivor
You have been pushing people to provide content but you haven't been producing it much yourself. Instead, you've been riding a Malee vote, but that has been riding for oh so long now and it's time to shit or get off the pot. Recent posts have not been helping.
Alice wrote:Can you expand on this and explain exactly which posts gave you that vibe?
SA wrote:. Please rank bike, alice, and moan in scumminess
In post 32, Lastsurvivor wrote:In post 29, Rhinox wrote:In post 27, Lastsurvivor wrote:DDD, if you think asking for the last person in a person's will is "useless information," then why did you ask the question in the first place?
oooh good point
Rhinox, do you always BS your way through RVS like you are now? Or is this just how you play your scum games? (srs question)
Most of your "scumhunting" so far has been related to DDD. By that, I mean deflecting his question back to him and this post above. What do you think of DDD, Rhinox?
DDD, good answer.
In post 72, Lastsurvivor wrote:@
VOTE: Sleepless Assassin
Mainly because of the "you seem on edge" accusation he threw out towards fish, and the lack of justification.
I don't like how he asked for Rhinox's votes either. Seems like he was trying to manipulate what he thought was a frustrated Rhino.
In post 93, Lastsurvivor wrote:
A thing I noticed with SA at first is thathe's talking about a whole lotta nothing.Which is what I pointed out in my original post andhis floppy reasoningwith the fishy attack. His last post definitely has that as well. If you look at that big paragraph, it's a bunch offence sitting and jibberjabber. Why expand on the DDD/Nacho conflict if a) you have nothing to say and b ) DDD isn't even your top scum choice? Because it's an easy thing for scum to talk about, that's why.
SA's biggest scum ITT.
In post 160, Lastsurvivor wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Malee
L-2.
SA's not looking too bad to me anymore. Malee, on the other hand, is just a mess whenever she appears. The thing that bothers me the most isthe pandering. I know I defended her because she played like this in another game, but she never pandered even when she was under fire. I feel like she just saw that in some "how 2 be gud scum" article and copied it
the three main wagons of today have been funky, alice, and macro; the vote count may not show it but you have pushed all of those lynches when they were the center of discussion. You have moved on to someone new everytime there was and indication of discussion shifting. You can not simply pass this off as "correlation is not causesation".LS wrote:Meh. If you look at the vote count archive, that's not really true. Well, someone might always jump off before I unvote, sure, but I don't always end up on the biggest wagon.
LS wrote:Just in case it isn't clear to everyone: We're lynching either funky or theo today. If you aren't on either of their wagons, stop lollygagging and hop on.
I'd rather you hop on funky, but you know.
This is what I was getting at earlier about him using questions to mask actions as a pro-town stance. The main motivation of that statement is to place doubt into macro's claim being a towntell.LS wrote:What does everyone think of Macro's claim? Some of us seem to find it a town tell, but I'm not so sure
Last is trying to portray himself as this uber-towny who generates all sorts of discussion.LS wrote:I basically made Alice the center of discussion
fishy wrote:I'm not really seeing the LS case - his recent responses to me are pretty convincing.
DDD wrote:astsurvivor's 422 is a way bad post; he sells out for a lesser lynch than his prefered target and he gets that kind of snotty tone that I get when I'm scum and have people suspecting me for what I think are wrong reasons.
nope you're sidestepping the point, anybody can want to win a debate. Your behaviour shows that disproving arguments is a higher priority for you than figuring out alighnments(ie. you care more about how people percieve you than you do about scumhunting).LS wrote:But I can't believe you're accusing me of being scummy because I'm trying to "win" the arguments against me.
In post 649, Rhinox wrote:End of Day vote count with my townreads in light green:
In post 642, LlamaFluff wrote:End of Day Vote Count
(7) -Lastsurvivor, 4nxi3ty,nachomamma8DCLXVI, Macrophage,Alicewondering,kortul, hiplop
Macrophage (3) - Voidedmafia, Debonair Danny DiPietro,rhinox
Debonair Danny DiPietro (3) - Sleepless Assassin,fishythefish,Lastsurvivor
My current thinking is DDD-scum. That makes SA and voided lean-town, and likely 2 of {4nxi3ty, Macro, hiplop} scum - probably 4nx and 1 of the other 2. SA's vote doesn't feel like a bus. He made comments at the end of the day about not liking either of Macro/LS wagons, while voting DDD. Voided/DDD, eh possible, but I think DDD's recent post points to no. DDD find reasons to call everyone scummy BUT voided. If DDD is scum, thats a pretty good sign voided is town. I don't think hiplop/macro are scum together, so that would make 4nx scum by POE. One of Macro/hiplop as the last scum? I'm not confident here. I could possibly see myself having a bad read on like kortul, or mayyyybe fishy.
there really wasn't much to vote on considering it we were only on the first page of D1.SA wrote:ISO 1: Accepts fish's explanation, but leaves the vote. Could he have forgotten to unvote? Or maybe he saw nothing to vote on?
is there scum motivation in this post? objectively, I find it very hard to see any indication of either alignment in iso2. Also, I did expand on my ls vote in a later post:SA wrote:ISO 2: Votes Last in a vote-only post.
In post 120, 4nxi3ty wrote:yep, your points against SA are a bit of an overstatement in my eyes. Had similar feelings about your case against rhinox though I think it comes from a more confirmationbias shootfirst playstyle than a scum mindest.
At that stage in the game seeing someone with a jumpy(or paranoid) vibe is as good to go off of as anything else. A wagonhop from fishy to malee? eh your a little off base there. If I think someone is scummy the amount votes on that person won't deter from joining a wagon in most circumstances.SA wrote:ISO 3: Votes Malee for being "jumpy". Looks like a wagon hop to me. Honestly, I see scum voting town here. Maybe I'm wrong on Malee. Also, what was the Last vote all about?
I don't think being unsure about someone's alignment at the very early stages in the game is wish-washy.SA wrote:ISO 7: Answers "what do you think of DDD" with a wishy washy maybe scum maybe town answer. I don't think he's done anything to try to clarify the read either. What really gets me is the use of an exclamation point in "I could easily see scum!" and then where I expect an explanation and maybe mini-case, it starts to turn into maybe he's town, let's wait and see.
In post 134, 4nxi3ty wrote:I could easily see scum!Danny playing in a way not to stand out
don't really get how thats a bad answer. rhinox asked if scum-malee would push a case on nacho voting vincent? malee never really made a case(it was just a few post barely out of rvs) and her vote was based on nacho skimming(the push was never based on the voting). the question itself was flawed.SA wrote:ISO 8: This is a pretty bad answer to Rhinox's question about whether Malee's actions make sense as scum.
meh I don't mind using pot-shots for pressure. Me leaving trails would only be valid if rhinox flipped scum and I went "see, I knew he was scum give me towncred", neither of those things have happened though.SA wrote:ISO 9: Another pot-shot like the one on DDD, this time at Rhinox. Says he is reactive rather than proactive. It's a negative, maybe scum, kind of point to make, but nothing to pursue. It seems like he's leaving these trails that he can point back to and say "see, they gave me bad vibes here".
it is also a good move for town since a replacement can take some time and a replacement might shed new light on a slot. bike hasn't flipped so basing my lynch on being scumbuddies with him makes for weak scumhunting.SA wrote:ISO 11: Unvotes Malee for replacement. If 4n was wagon-hopping scum, this is a good move because for whatever reason nobody ever lynches someone who replaces out while being wagoned. Shows a strong preference for Alicescum rather than Bikescum. If my reads on the two are correct, this makes sense for 4nScum because Bike would be his scumbuddy.
In post 656, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Hey, I don't care about those things either; I care about how you apparently don't have your own opinion just using the opinions of others for cover.
when anybody goes missing for a chunk of time it is going to raise suspicions, I don't think that is absurd. To me it wasn't about not having enough townreads. It was about only saying negative things,no positives, about 8 different people. In theory, you are simultaneously moving all 8 closer to being lynched; and since we know it is impossible for all 8 to be scum, that bothers me.In post 671, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:I have to say some of the “points” against me are pretty absurd. I don’t have enough town reads? I didn’t talk about the middle of the day enough? Sorry, I put down what stuck out to me one way or another when I re-read the game. I’m not going to arbitrarily make up town reads or talk about things I don’t think are important.
In post 673, Macrophage wrote:Also, what do people think of Rhinox's reasoning for voting Debonair?
In post 552, Fishythefish wrote:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DDD
Read DDD's ISO. It won't take long. There's nothing in there that looks like he's trying to catch scum - the closest he comes is with the Amished tell, when he wants the support of others. He's never really pushed anything.
In post 667, Fishythefish wrote:DDD seems an ok choice, but no more than that.
In post 603, Alicewondering wrote:I found DCL's point on a fishy/LS team interesting, but I don't think that this interaction comes from a scumpair
In light of someone posting about DDD-meta, I'm going to UNVOTE: DDD. I would support an LS wagon today. I would NOT support a Macro-lynch today
VOTE: LastSurvivor
In post 449, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Lastsurvivor's 422 is a way bad post; he sells out for a lesser lynch than his prefered target
In post 692, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
1) Rhinox completely ignores meta context in this point;
2) basically I hate every post of yours from the first pander to LS
3) and if I do get lynched or killed andwhen I flip green then you can’t hide from this nonsense.[/u]
In post 673, Macrophage wrote:Also, what do people think of Rhinox's reasoning for voting Debonair?
In post 681, Macrophage wrote:I want to see what other people think before elaborating.
In post 699, Macrophage wrote:Oh yeah I forgot about that. I thought that avoiding questions was a bad reason to think Debonair was scum.
In post 724, Macrophage wrote:Well except for Debonair. He's a special case, but he can go in the scumpile too.
In post 778, Sleepless Assassin wrote:The content thing was actually macro's pooint, not mine.
cause I felt like itIn post 791, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Why the avatar change?
In post 796, Fishythefish wrote:@4n: if you remember, what were you thinking about SA's case at this point? Later, you responded to it, and you had pretty reasonable explanations. Why didn't you post them at the time, to try to convince SA you were town?
In post 800, kortul wrote:It may be somewhat affected by the other game we are in right now
...I never said he hopelessly tunneled on a funky/me team... I never said I wasn't going to try and persuade him... And I never said he was beyond reason...In post 804, Fishythefish wrote:So, what made you think that SA was hopelessly tunnelled on a you/funky team? That's what's weird to me - you basically said you weren't going to try and persuade him because he was beyond reason, and I don't get that at all from his posts. Looks like an easy way to write off a case.
If I thought SA was tunneling I would've specifically said he tunneled.In post 813, Fishythefish wrote:I still don't really understand what you meant. The bit I bolded really reads to me as saying SA is tunnelled, not just that he's wrong. I guess there's not much more to say on this.
I think DDD's actually doing stuff today. I haven't really got a read on that stuff, but I'm hopeful that I can, whereas yesterday he was a big useless blank.
4nx wrote:The second part of that sentence is me attempting to get SA to realize he had an idea cemented into his head that is wrong.
SA wrote:Overall: Holy fuck, 4n is scum. Assuming I'm right, Malee is town because there is no way they are buddies. Bike and 4n are definitely buddies though. If I was a dayvig, I'd be shooting 4n in this post and voting Bike because they both need to die Day 1.
In post 826, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I'd actually like to hear what everyone saw in DCL that was more townie than Bike was scummy.
In post 856, Macrophage wrote:@4nx: What is your 2nd most preferred lynch?
Magua wrote:And so, hah, I just see that my replaced slot had the hammer vote on either Macrophage or DDD earlier. Yet no one seems to have been pushing for action, or for Alice to remove her lone single vote off of Sleepless Assassin. That's....well, that's just downright bizarre.
In post 889, Magua wrote:Think DCL is probably town, but this is shakier than Rhino.
Think hiplop and DDD are both wastes of space, but unsure if they're town wastes of space or scum pretending to be wastes of space.
which reads do you agree with and why?In post 894, Magua wrote: DCL's subsequent replacement in seems very genuine. I'm a sucker for someone who puts in work, which DCL has put it in spades, but I find myself agreeing with most of his reads, as well.
In post 895, 4nxi3ty wrote:
which reads do you agree with and why?In post 894, Magua wrote: DCL's subsequent replacement in seems very genuine. I'm a sucker for someone who puts in work, which DCL has put it in spades, but I find myself agreeing with most of his reads, as well.
In post 925, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:In post 924, 4nxi3ty wrote:danny, what is your current read of fishy?
Same as it has been most of the day; likelier town than not. I'm still high on a big three of Macro/Rhinox/SA though one of those last two might be wrong for someone who is/was voting for Macro.
In post 914, Fishythefish wrote:Oooo, a non-standard role.
UNVOTE:
Because DDD being at L-1 doesn't seem a great idea right now.
In post 933, Fishythefish wrote:And seriously? I finally have an avenue to avoid bussing my buddy? Read my damn ISO. If DDD was my buddy, and I didn't want to bus him, I've have had plenty of opportunities to stick to my reads on other people to get other lynches
It isn't about meta. It is about how you are aware that scum sometimes have the tendency to waffle, yet you haven't expressed the slightest suspicion towards fishy's waffles.In post 934, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:In post 931, 4nxi3ty wrote:his play reminds me of junpei from magician mafia, i've been kinda waiting for you to call him out on all the waffling...
I didn't read Magician Mafia looking for scum so I didn't really remember that at all. More importantly, why would I use junpei meta for Ftf when I have Ftf meta I can use?
both, and thats all I really have to say on that matter for now.A mason in the sense that you have a QT together or a mason in the sense that you're willing to say your partner is confirmed town?
Ftf wrote:What do you think of my take on that claim? I think it's pretty likely - a Secretary, who writes out wills, gets to alter someone's will by not typing it out right. This power would be really huge for scum - particularly as the game wears on - and so I doubt they have it.
Ftf wrote:Where have I waffled?