[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 3988036 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Dance of the Title Fairy: ORCA's Greatest Hits - Mafiascum.net
A subforum entirely dedicated to the discussion of titles. The title fairy has carte blanche in this subforum.
34 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Mr. Flay
Mr. Flay
Metatron
Mr. Flay
Metatron
Metatron
Posts: 24969
Joined: March 12, 2004
Location: Gormenghast
Post
Post #10 (isolation #0) » Sat Apr 21, 2012 11:25 am
Postby Mr. Flay »
That's almost funny.
I want to open up discussion on my title. I haven't been heavily involved in the wiki for years... does it still suit? I'm not fishing for a new one, just curious about the current, for now.
Post
Post #233 (isolation #6) » Thu May 10, 2012 9:11 am
Postby Mr. Flay »
I agree with SKrew, actually. Traditionally (but not prehistorically) the titlee gets veto and sometimes tiebreaker power... that's it. Suggestions are for others to do.
NS: c is indeed different, but that's not what's going on here.
Post
Post #644 (isolation #16) » Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:46 pm
Postby Mr. Flay »
I'm just now reading the last four pages of shitstorm. It's been a busy week.
scumchat titles have gotten through before. They have also gotten pushback before. Like so many things, it's situational. There has been no Skittles Ruling on meet-related titles, despite what Reck thinks.
In post 645, Mr. Flay wrote:scumchat titles have gotten through before. They have also gotten pushback before. Like so many things, it's situational. There has been no Skittles Ruling on meet-related titles, despite what Reck thinks.
are you just incapable of reading comprehension or are you just being overly facetious when you imply I've stated I think the admins have made a ruling on meet-related titles
ok... emphasis mine:
In post 584, xRECKONERx wrote:Wait are we really considering meet-based titles after being told point-blank last January that meet-based titles
weren't allowed
?
In post 596, xRECKONERx wrote:I wouldn't be so adamant if this exact same thing with the exact same reasons hadn't come up 6 months ago and The Reckoning peeps had been told "nope, not allowed, suck it up"
I totally support a
policy change
but it needs to be applied evenly and not just to people who happen to be buddies with those making the decisions.
Post
Post #662 (isolation #18) » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:24 am
Postby Mr. Flay »
Back on topic, I think we liked constant vigilance but were just divided on capitalization. Oman can probably just declare one option best (we can also shrink font size a bit if ALLCAPS is gonna be too much).
Post
Post #1170 (isolation #28) » Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:48 am
Postby Mr. Flay »
Yeah, I doubt the "goddamnit" thing is going to be sustained. Which is not an absolute bar to a title obviously, but gives me extra pause when the shtick is being mostly propagated by people other than the proposed recipient.
Post
Post #1265 (isolation #29) » Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:18 pm
Postby Mr. Flay »
Crap might be lowered, but good stuff would certainly be harmed. Having to hold/remember all the title suggestions will decrease the rate of nominations, which is NOT what we need right now (we just need less crap mixed in).
Having nominations go by PM/form to the Title Fairy, who then puts them forward for comment every so often, might work, however. It's a pretty big shift though.