The Mole [Updated - Apply Now!]


User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #2 (isolation #0) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:48 pm

Post by Blackberry »

This should not be called "The Mole". This is completely different. It's moreso a random Survivor/Big Brother thingy where alliances take priority over anything else.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #4 (isolation #1) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:56 pm

Post by Blackberry »

The Mole can *pick* among those who do not guess correctly who is eliminated.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #6 (isolation #2) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:19 pm

Post by Blackberry »

The Mole changes each round though, and there is no "Quiz", lol.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #9 (isolation #3) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:28 pm

Post by Blackberry »

In post 7, Xalxe wrote:
In post 4, Blackberry wrote:The Mole can *pick* among those who do not guess correctly who is eliminated.


But as the Mole, you want competence to stick around so you win money, so I don't see how an alliance will stop me from eliminating a moron.


Making an alliance will prevent others from eliminating you, etc. So pretty much you just said you would make an alliance with the other strong players of the game.

If there is only strong players in the game, when it gets down to the strong players, that just means everyone that is The Mole will get eliminated each round because all the challenges will be won. :P
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #10 (isolation #4) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:28 pm

Post by Blackberry »

In post 8, chesskid3 wrote:no out of thread communication
problem solved


You don't need out of thread communication to form alliances. >_>
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #12 (isolation #5) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:38 pm

Post by Blackberry »

In post 11, animorpherv1 wrote:Anyone making alliances in thread is asking for elimination though...


Not true.

One can just say "First 8 people to post, let's eliminate the other 4 ASAP." Then the other 7 post and tuh-duh. Everyone who posts is held accountable, etc.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #15 (isolation #6) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:43 pm

Post by Blackberry »

In post 14, chesskid3 wrote:
In post 12, Blackberry wrote:
In post 11, animorpherv1 wrote:Anyone making alliances in thread is asking for elimination though...


Not true.

One can just say "First 8 people to post, let's eliminate the other 4 ASAP." Then the other 7 post and tuh-duh. Everyone who posts is held accountable, etc.

no incentive to comply


It works all the time in Elect The Executioner... lol.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #16 (isolation #7) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:44 pm

Post by Blackberry »

Regardless, alliances still play an important role.

I.e., if me and someone else who are close both join the game. We can have an unspoken alliance and not eliminate eachother, etc.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #19 (isolation #8) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:47 pm

Post by Blackberry »

In post 18, Xalxe wrote:
In post 16, Blackberry wrote:Regardless, alliances still play an important role.

I.e., if me and someone else who are close both join the game. We can have an unspoken alliance and not eliminate eachother, etc.


You're spoiling
everything!


Also, we'd know that and so
if we thought it was an issue we'd fix it
.


Exactly.
You just confirmed how alliances (and anti-alliances) play an important role in this game.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #21 (isolation #9) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:50 pm

Post by Blackberry »

Yes, this is Ferris Wheel ^_^.

Except Moles can be easily eliminated and easily detected =D.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #25 (isolation #10) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 3:58 pm

Post by Blackberry »

In post 22, chesskid3 wrote:BB IS MAD BECAUSE CHESSKID SHOT HIM

NEWS AT 12


BB is and was not mad? I was dead anyways with Drench shooting third. :P
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #28 (isolation #11) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:16 pm

Post by Blackberry »

If me and player X are aligned, yes I'll help player X get money because then player X will help me get money when I'm the Mole. =P
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #30 (isolation #12) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:21 pm

Post by Blackberry »

Why would he not help me? If he's my friend and ally it benefits him to help me. A: We can eliminate whoever we want. B: I can help him keep his cover when he is The Mole. C:I can help him earn money when he is The Mole, etc., etc.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #33 (isolation #13) » Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:51 pm

Post by Blackberry »

In post 31, mastermind wrote:But that plan can only work if one of you is the mole right? Otherwise you're basically playing the game. I was only trying to be creative/different and still try to make the incentive of players playing to win the missions and the mole trying to sabotage as best as he can.


Everyone is guaranteed to be The Mole at least once. Best plan for sabotage and go without being suspected: grab a friend (or small group) that you trust and that trusts you. You tell eachother when you're the Mole, and I will make sure all the challenges are lost when he/she/they are the Mole, and they make sure all the challenges are lost when I'm the Mole. :P

If you've ever seen Trapped/played online, it's very easily broken by groups of players banding together.
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #41 (isolation #14) » Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:23 am

Post by Blackberry »

In post 40, RedPanda wrote:I'd play this if this was just a normal mole game.


This.

But feel free to try out what you desire. Im overly critical ;-).
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #44 (isolation #15) » Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:14 am

Post by Blackberry »

In post 43, cg5 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the way vanilla Mole handles eliminations is stupid?


What part (and why) is stupid exactly? >_>
User avatar
Blackberry
Blackberry
berry
User avatar
User avatar
Blackberry
berry
berry
Posts: 3158
Joined: June 18, 2005
Location: Ohio

Post Post #49 (isolation #16) » Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:12 pm

Post by Blackberry »

In post 46, cg5 wrote:
In post 44, Blackberry wrote:
In post 43, cg5 wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the way vanilla Mole handles eliminations is stupid?


What part (and why) is stupid exactly? >_>
The part where you answer a quiz, with questions like "Is the Mole male or female?" How am I supposed to guess that? There's no correlation between Mole-ness and gender. Like, I can't really look at the past events and conclude that we have a male Mole. The best I can do look at my top suspects and say, like, 3 of them are male and 2 are female, and guess which is more likely from that, which maximises the probability, but there's still luck involved. Why not just cut the questions and do this:

have everyone rank the other players from most likely to be the mole to least likely, and eliminate whoever put the actual mole the lowest in their list
, and then your elimination is decided entirely by how accurate your suspicions are.

On the other hand, questions about what actions the mole made in the previous challenge are fine, as you can actually reason about what the mole would be more likely to do.

That said, I never actually watched more than 3 episodes. Did the audience ever even see the quiz questions?


The beauty of the Quiz format is that if you stay or go is based entirely upon yourself. Unlike other games, allliances and other people disliking you play no factor in whether you win or lose, as ultimately it depends on how well your suspscions are of the identity of The Mole. The new format proposed by mastermind, although interseting, completely eliminates the fact that whether or not you stay or go is based entirely on yourself. This could essentially be relabeled "Ferris Wheel Revamped" as it's basically Ferris Wheel except if you can guess who is the shooter that round you get immunity. :P

There is actually a LOT more strategy to taking the Quiz than meets the eye. If you have three main suspects, essentially sure you might put Male as your answer to that question. Remember,
you still have NINE other questions
. Your survival is not dependent on any one question.

What you are proposing "rank the players" is an idea... although all it is essentially doing is
dumbing down
what the Quiz is already doing. And it has the strong potential to 'break' the game as well and make it too easy for players to identify the Mole. I don't see a huge issue with it other than the fact it is dumbing down
exactly what the Quiz is doing
. I could elaborate more, but I don't want to ruin all the strategies of "The Mole" so easily. Just trust me when I say this is what the Quiz is already doing 100%.

Lastly, concerning the Quizzes, how I have always done my quizzes and my top preference for how other moderators should do quizzes in Mole games: Make sure the answers are all locatable. For example, I would NEVER ask for the gender and location of where the Mole lives in an anonymous game, as that boils down completely to luck. I strongly prefer all questions are found within the thread or forum area so that nothing is based on luck or opportunity. This ensures fairness to all parties. I will agree with you 100% that if the moderator does base questions on opportunity or luck, it does lower the fairness (and thus the fun level) of the game.

Return to “Social Game Archive”