The game of the year: town won!

[AGar]

VOTE: Chesskid3

I like this idea.

[AGar]

I'm not sure what Fred will do. I do know Chesskid will generally derp it up.

Kill it with fire.

[AGar]

Idea: split into 5 random groups of 10, focus on 1group per week, lynch the scummiest from each group for 5 lynches in 5 weeks for the first day.

Pros: makes scumhunting more focused and natural
Scum unable to lurk through early days

Cons: some groups might not have scum

I wouldcontinue doing this for every day there are multiple lynches, so until19 players remain. Every new day reshuffle groups amd split into n groups where n= number of lynches. Always choose 1 lynch from each group.

Thoughtts?

Idea: Lynch the fuck out of Chesskid before he can fuck up this beautiful game.

[AGar]

No. We're not doing that.

Then provide a good reason why not and why random and policy is better.

Because you're suggesting that 50 people analyze only 10 people at once, but what you're neglecting is that some scum are caught because they're scumhunting is absolute bullshit, and that there's opportunity to be called out on that. If someone outside of that group of 10 acts like shit, then you're expecting us until we get done with 1-4 other groups before that gets called on? With 50 people posting?

C'mon. You're a better player than this Rhinox.

[AGar]

Because he's chesskid?

Because he has a notorious habit of devolving into a troll-happy liability to the town who lets outside grudges impair his judgment on the actual events of the game if certain players are present in the game's playerlist.

[AGar]

Because you're suggesting that 50 people analyze only 10 people at once, but what you're neglecting is that some scum are caught because they're scumhunting is absolute bullshit, and that there's opportunity to be called out on that. If someone outside of that group of 10 acts like shit, then you're expecting us until we get done with 1-4 other groups before that gets called on? With 50 people posting?

C'mon. You're a better player than this Rhinox.

So provide a strategy better than lol policy lynch chesskid which does jack shit.

I don't see why you can't make notes of scummy things ppl from outside the group of 10 do and then lynch them for it when their group comes up.

I'm looking for a strategy to do something useful while treating this like a 50 player game not "reduce the number to something manageable and then start and hope we're not screwed by the numbers at that point"

We have

5

day 1 lynches. If you think one policy lynch will render zero information, I really feel like you're trolling.

Also, because their shit will be buried by plenty of inane shit (remember... 50 players. POSTING.) and they'll have plenty of time to fabricate a cover for it when in a natural environment they would be called immediately. This is the problem with segmented scumhunting.

That you can't see the flaws in this idea is pretty saddening to me.

[AGar]

VOTE: Rhinox

That he's actually suggesting isolating into groups of 10 for however long and insistently sticking with it baffles me.

This vote is 100% serious. No policy here, nothing. Just. What the fuck.

[AGar]

VOTE: Chesskid3

Until flip is ensured. Then I move to Rhinox.