NomicScum, Game 2

[T-Bone]

I'll play

[T-Bone]

Sure I'll agree.

[T-Bone]

I still like it.

[T-Bone]

I still vote YAY

[T-Bone]

The rule was pretty clear. Apparently some people don't want to be held accountable for taking their turn in a timely manner.

[T-Bone]

YEA

[T-Bone]

I like it. YAY

[T-Bone]

Nay to that suggestion.

[T-Bone]

I will only support the option that rids people who don't play the game the fastest. Is that option 1?

[T-Bone]

If they all take the exact same amount of time, why the debate?

[T-Bone]

I prefer the strictest option.

YES!

[T-Bone]

Vote: Aye

The ayes have it?

[T-Bone]

I shall also boycott anyone who has a problem with the simple majority rule.

[T-Bone]

Unvote: Yay, Vote: Nay

Sorry, it occurred to me simple majority is a bad idea. I don't want unanimity, but I don't want to allow for a super-block alliance the new system would allow for either. I'll change my vote back if the proposition is reconsidered to be 3/4s of the player list instead of 51%. I implore others to do the same.

[T-Bone]

We'll never pass any rules unless the change to this proposal I want is considered.

[T-Bone]

Again, currently we all have to agree, and JDGA changed my mind. He succumbed to the pressure, but I'm not so easily swayed.

Since we need everyone to vote yes, you do have to entertain my objections. The current proposal allows for a majority block player that are barely half the player list the opportunity to control. I don't think half + 1 is enough to decide our fate in the game. Which is why I want a 75% majority rule instead of a 51%.

[T-Bone]

I'll just filibuster the game to death and that won't be any fun. Your fate in this matter is sealed. Ani's rule could have probably paved the way from preventing any one player from stalling the game forever, but that got shot down. But, currently I can vote no this round, and then hold onto my vote for quite a long time, needlessly prolonging the game. JDGA was right we hastily went into this vote, I should have stood with him then.

[T-Bone]

I'm not being a prick. I don't think we should do majority +1.

Proposition fails I guess since no one wants to be diplomatic. Just as all future propositions will.

[T-Bone]

mY TURN IS NEXT TO LAST, SO i THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO GET SOMETHING LIKE THIS THROUGH NOW.

[T-Bone]

Lol, I had a rebellious caps lock.

[T-Bone]

Well if the playerlist is going to hold a grudge because I want discussion, then I guess there shall be a lot of grandstanding from me. I don't see any discussion from any one, I just see a bunch of empty threats, which frankly I don't care about.

I know we're voting on simple majority, and I don't want simple majority, I want a supermajority. This proposal does not accomplish what I want. You're supposed to convince me, because right now we need unanimity to make any changes what-so-ever.

[T-Bone]

I don't intend to propose the supermajority rule change. I just completely disagree with the simple majority rule. Why should I put it in place if I think it's wrong?

[T-Bone]

Two cycles? Praytell, how long is that gonna take?

[T-Bone]

I can wait. Two cycles is a long time... I'd rather this get struckdown and we open dialogue for a supermajority rule for the person who goes next. It really doesn't depend on me. It depends on getting a better draft of this rule. I'm flexible on the percentages or whatever it takes.

My vote can be bought.

[T-Bone]

And you don't seem to understand that I will reject this same exact rule until it dies.

[T-Bone]

It's not time wasted. I want discussion. You want blind voting. Sorry, I'm not going for that. Because then we'll start passing bad rules.

It won't pass Xalxe, because everyone has to also leave it alone for two cycles.

Two cycles is a LONG time. Good luck with the threats though. That's working.

I seem to be the only one in this discussion willing to be flexible.

[T-Bone]

You guys have already made clear to me that you will block any attempt to change it to a supermajority later. Therefore, I have nothing to lose by prolonging my effort.

[T-Bone]

But even if I agree you can still block it so, what's the benefit of me voting Yea for something I don't want?

[T-Bone]

That's a good start.

[T-Bone]

liveinthelie97, though it isn't working at this exact moment. Edit: Now it is. Weird

I have some things to think about. Give time for someone other than us to chime in.

[T-Bone]

unvote, vote Yea

[T-Bone]

We're still missing a player aren't we?

[T-Bone]

I dunno, I don't want any extra responsibilities to this game. I just wanna play. Rulemaker and Judge are fine roles, and so far everything else has been done on a volunteer basis.

We could just elect someone to do "x" Job.

[T-Bone]

By someone proposing a new rule to get points.

[T-Bone]

vote: yay

[T-Bone]

I don't like number 3, 1 and 2 are meh.

[T-Bone]

+1

[T-Bone]

I will vote against any rule that allows for adding more players...

[T-Bone]

/agrees with Chevre

[T-Bone]

I say Nea

[T-Bone]

The proposition has to do with letting in new players, not whatever Ani is talking about.

I am opposed to new players. We have enough.

[T-Bone]

Motion failed.

[T-Bone]

Nope, he doesn't win. We move on.

[T-Bone]

Sure.

Vote: Nay

[T-Bone]

Good thing we accepted Ani's rule which would have prevented this situation.

OH WAIT

[T-Bone]

Anti-climatic. I am out.