In post 428, Guttersnipe wrote:Hey havingfitz, how come you're ignoring everything I had to say about Chaos and focusing on IS?
I'm not ignoring it...I haven't read it yet.
In post 428, Guttersnipe wrote:Hey havingfitz, how come you're ignoring everything I had to say about Chaos and focusing on IS?
In post 422, Tebow wrote:In post 420, havingfitz wrote:
You misquoted me. In quotations.
My use of 'odd' inferred 'out of the ordinary...not easily explained' whereas I view weird as 'whacky or bizarre'. Which is not what I meant.
The two are synonyms. Both mean 'strange.' It's very notable you chose to go with a very pedantic semantic nitpick of the phrasing there.
In post 450, havingfitz wrote:In post 428, Guttersnipe wrote:Hey havingfitz, how come you're ignoring everything I had to say about Chaos and focusing on IS?
I'm not ignoring it...I haven't read it yet.
In post 427, Guttersnipe wrote:Here's an unofficial vote count based on the count the quote links to and the votes since then.
including this one since the mcstab wagon is less lively than I thought it was
unvote, vote: ChaosOmega
In post 354, Iknal wrote:Current VoteCount 1.8:
Code_X - 2 - Maestro, Arugula
havingfitz - 0 - No-one
McStab - 1 - havingfitz
ChaosOmega - 3 - Guttersnipe, Fate, Internet Stranger
Guttersnipe - 1 - McStab
Internet Stranger - 2 - Tebow, ChaosOmega
Tebow - 0 - No-one
Maestro - 0 - No-one
Arugula - 2 - Code_X, Axxle
Axxle - 0 - No-one
Fate - 0 - No-one
Not voting - 0 - No one
With 11 alive it takes 6 to Lynch
In post 430, Maestro wrote:Hmm...totally I thought I put this there. Read spoiler for explanation: VOTE: McStab
In post 439, Arugula wrote:UNVOTE: Code_X even though I don't want to.
VOTE: McStab
Chaos should not be lynched today. Neither should IS.
In post 446, Tebow wrote:Chaos needs to claim NOW, in case he has anything confirmable and we need time to get an alternative wagon to lynch.
Actually,unvote, Vote McStabso that I don't go offline with my vote in a useless place.
In post 445, McStab wrote:To summarize Maestro's views on IS and Code_X, he doesn't think they should be lynched today. Nor do you. Maestro thinks I should be lynched, so do you. Oso thought I should be lynched, so did you. The next post you make after Oso decides I shouldn't be lynched and Code_X should, you decide I shouldn't and Code_X should. Difference is, Oso and Maestro gave real reasons for their reads; you followed in every single situation and haven't offered much at all in the way of reasoning.
In post 459, ChaosOmega wrote:So many questions.
Tebow, why did you demand a claim from me and not McStab when we were both at L-1?