Open 420: Medical Mafia - That's all, folks!

FuDuzn · Post Post #300 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:33 pm

Ok then, since I was the most recent to divulge my actions. Yellowbounder why don't you go next.

yellowbounder · Post Post #301 (ISO) » Sat Jul 21, 2012 11:43 pm

I protected Rach. Rach, who did you protect?

Robocopter87 · Post Post #302 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:14 am

Gonna get poked if I don't say something.

Waiting on Rach.

Try to keep the discussion to a min till the massclaim is finished. Don't want scum getting any ideas off of town discussion so they can fake their actions.

Robocopter87 · Post Post #303 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:14 am

And by massclaim I obviously mean action claims.

RachMarie · Post Post #304 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:27 am

Due to personal life issues I forgot to send in a night action uggh I was going out of my mind trying to reach my dad for 3 days because he was supposed to be coming for a visit this weekend.

Robocopter87 · Post Post #305 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:44 am

popcorn it to someone

RachMarie · Post Post #306 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:26 pm

Mortontfrh · Post Post #307 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:39 pm

Venmar · Post Post #308 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:47 pm

You've been popcorn'd.

Robocopter87 · Post Post #309 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:52 pm

In post 308, Venmar wrote:You've been popcorn'd.

Mortontfrh · Post Post #310 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:15 pm

Interesting, I was not aware.

I already stated that I have no intentions of claiming before everyone else has, why do you think my stance would suddenly change?

Robocopter87 · Post Post #311 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:21 pm

Do it.

Only scum have reason to hold back.

Just claim your action.

Mortontfrh · Post Post #312 (ISO) » Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:51 pm

Aww how cute, the person who hasn't claimed their action is saying it's scummy to not claim their action.

Venmar · Post Post #313 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:03 am

Seriously Morton? You've been pocorn'd, if you want RoboCopter to claim his target then answer yours and popcorn him. You're acting awfully weird right now.

Zachrulez · Post Post #314 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:11 am

Robocopter - ???
RachMarie - No action
YellowBounder - Rach
Zachrulez- Yellowbounder
Fuduzn - Morton
Morton - ???
Venmar - Morton

Let me know if I got any of that wrong so far.

In post 301, yellowbounder wrote:I protected Rach. Rach, who did you protect?

Why did you chose to popcorn Rach instead of Robo or Mort?

I also don't really care who claims first between Robocopter and Mort. We only have two weeks to figure something out here and I don't want to spend a sizable portion of it fighting over who claims first between Robo and Mort. If it will help move things along and get us past the massclaim, I'd be fine with Robo claiming first and having Mort explain why he wanted to claim last after the fact.

yellowbounder · Post Post #315 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:50 am

In post 312, Mortontfrh wrote:Aww how cute, the person who hasn't claimed their action is saying it's scummy to not claim their action.

It's

popcorn

.

Robocopter87 · Post Post #316 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:07 am

If it is because you protected Jackal, then just say it. Because at this point that is all I can see you would hold back for.

I will claim, even if I wasn't popcorn'd. Mort didn't have a single reason to be last to claim. But I don't have any problem claiming my action so I'll just go ahead.

I did not take an action. I did not find anybody town enough to be protected and knew someone else would protect Rach, also I figured that the less amount of actions flying around the more likely it would be to sort through them to figure out the vary degrees of sanity of our doctors.

Zachrulez · Post Post #317 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:15 am

Oh hai Yellowbounder.

In post 314, Zachrulez wrote:

Why did you chose to popcorn Rach instead of Robo or Mort?

Robocopter87 · Post Post #318 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:16 am

I'm sure you have a reason behind the question but I don't understand why he would choose me/mort over Rach. I wasn't aware of popcorn techniques, whenever I did it I would just kinda throw it to anyone.

Zachrulez · Post Post #319 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:25 am

In post 318, Robocopter87 wrote:I'm sure you have a reason behind the question but I don't understand why he would choose me/mort over Rach. I wasn't aware of popcorn techniques, whenever I did it I would just kinda throw it to anyone.

Well the idea is to make people you're suspicious of claim right after you.

In post 298, yellowbounder wrote:Yeah, first to die, you assume his doctorly powers.

And when I said popcorn claiming, I meant:

That someone says what they did last night, and then picks someone else. Who then says what they did last night, and then picks someone else. And so on. Scum can't manipulate the order to their advantage that way.

He understands the idea behind popcorning, but popcorning a confirmed town underminds the entire idea behind it.

yellowbounder · Post Post #320 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:03 am

In post 317, Zachrulez wrote:Oh hai Yellowbounder.

In post 314, Zachrulez wrote:

Why did you chose to popcorn Rach instead of Robo or Mort?

Sorry, missed that.

Because I had just typed her name, and decided to type it again. No higher reasoning that that.

Zachrulez wrote:
In post 318, Robocopter87 wrote:I'm sure you have a reason behind the question but I don't understand why he would choose me/mort over Rach. I wasn't aware of popcorn techniques, whenever I did it I would just kinda throw it to anyone.

Well the idea is to make people you're suspicious of claim right after you.

In post 298, yellowbounder wrote:Yeah, first to die, you assume his doctorly powers.

And when I said popcorn claiming, I meant:

That someone says what they did last night, and then picks someone else. Who then says what they did last night, and then picks someone else. And so on. Scum can't manipulate the order to their advantage that way.

He understands the idea behind popcorning, but popcorning a confirmed town underminds the entire idea behind it.

Oh. I was just picking someone semi-randomly.

FuDuzn · Post Post #321 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:07 am

I will say I never heard about pocorning before this and I had no idea you were supposed to choose who you thought were suspicious, that being said I chose yellobounder since it was between him and Morton who I was going to target last Night.

I will say I hate how stubborn Morton is getting here, don't be obtuse just for the sake of being obtuse.

RachMarie · Post Post #322 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:10 am

ok Mort EVERYONE else has stated something so no more excuses

Mortontfrh · Post Post #323 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:23 am

In post 316, Robocopter87 wrote:If it is because you protected Jackal, then just say it. Because at this point that is all I can see you would hold back for.

If you're smart enough to make that assumption, why would you continually hound me to state it out right? Yes, I targeted Jackal.

In post 321, FuDuzn wrote:I will say I hate how stubborn Morton is getting here, don't be obtuse just for the sake of being obtuse.

Being obtuse for the sake of being obtuse would imply that there was no motive for me withholding my claim. Do you really think I was just being stubborn solely to drag out the game?

Robocopter87 · Post Post #324 (ISO) » Mon Jul 23, 2012 9:26 am

I would continually hound you due to the fact that it didn't make sense to hide that information.

Also, I didn't hound you continually, I made the assumption and then moved on to claim before you just to get you to stop being a big baby about it.

Now from the information we have gathered we can begin deducing sanities.