VOTE:
Ummmmm. I barely know any of you. And by that I mean I only know Tangion.
VOTE: Tangion
For being a scummy **** in Space Mafia w/o actually being scum.
In post 61, Acosmist wrote:In post 60, DrippingGoofball wrote:Acosmist is a legitimate quicklynch as of now.
So you want:
1. an early end to day 1
2. an early claim
3. a fakeclaim from a townie
And after that, you will fakeclaim.
Well gosh, this was a productive day, Yates! I mean, DGB.
In post 130, roflcopter wrote:In post 40, AngryPidgeon wrote:One of you 2 is scum. Probably Acosmist.
who was the second person you were referring to in this post? toon fighter?
In post 128, Eidolon wrote:numberQ - the mistake hammer was odd. Something seems genuine about him. the hammer was too reckless to be scum.
In post 149, Toon Fighter wrote:scumbuddy much? vote: roflcopter
In post 39, Toon Fighter wrote:In post 37, Acosmist wrote:confirm vote
In post 38, AngryPidgeon wrote:Hurr durr, pidgeon is role-fishing obv scum.
In post 82, Toon Fighter wrote:In post 79, Acosmist wrote:ITT: scum are really excited that they got main characters as fakeclaims
lolwut?
unvote, vote: Acosmist
In post 149, Toon Fighter wrote:In my second post I was confirming my vote on AP, giving his post as a 'justification'
In post 149, Toon Fighter wrote:one person who is emitting scum vibes for me today is rofl. He immediately starts attacking rc for his nightkill speculation (which is not bad on itself, and could be useful), and spends the next few posts just defending Venmar, with no evidence whatsoever. scumbuddy much? vote: roflcopter
In post 129, roflcopter wrote:
In post 127, rapidcanyon wrote:DGB led a lynch on a townie making her an easy mislynch target. I don't see the scum motivation behind killing her. Could it be a vig? Or scum hoping to fake-claim vig later on?
the above is unhelpful and definitely isn't scum hunting. nothing you posted on day one really qualifies as scumhunting either. there's like one blah question to angry pidgeon and a bunch of iioa.
In post 160, roflcopter wrote:ap is scum bussing tf (probably). but tf is 100% scum. everyone should vote him now.
In post 161, Eidolon wrote:I've seen someone do that before as town, recently - vote for the person that is accused of being the others buddy.
In post 165, Venmar wrote:1. For some, retarded reason NumberQ decides to question town points given out to him... what? Don't take this the wrong way, but I don't see the reasoning behind questioning townreads on yourself, I have only seen this coming from scumplayers in MY experience. It's almost as if #Q is saying he doesn't want people to give him town credits, and rather scum credits, which at this point I would call a mental scumslip. A small, but notable thing for me.
In post 169, Blastoide wrote:Can you explain why you thought this at the time and why you changed your opinion?
For now he is leaning town, because his recent case seems legit.
In post 106, Eidolon wrote:so we already outed two major characters? not really feeling the mass-claim for that reason. futurama has a lot of characters so it doesn't seem like it would be that hard to fake one. we're handing up mafia our power roles and i have some suspicions of people who pushed this without much reason and/or people who avoided the issue.
i'll be able to respond more tomorrow. not sure about the acomist thing yet but i don't think we should rush to a lynch.
In post 69, roflcopter wrote:yes we should name claim
In post 184, roflcopter wrote:i'd like to point out that it is perfectly plausible for alignments and roles to be completely independent. as in, the mod chose what 13 characters to include, then put their names in a hat to pick which would be mafia.
In post 189, Venmar wrote:- The first more of suggests he supports the idea of a name claim, while at the same time he didn't specify why, or if it is helpful.
In post 75, roflcopter wrote:whoever dgb exempts can skip it obvi, she knows what she's doing
In post 188, Venmar wrote:Right now, I am going to throw down a vote until I can figure out this mess between AB, Rofl, and Toon.
Vote: NumberQ
@Angrybird - What happened to you attacking NumberQ this day phase for hammering Acosmist? You said whatever Acosmist would flip you were going to pursue NumberQ, so what happened to that? You have seemed to forget about him, and until you explain this i'm going to assume you were just saying that last day phase to distance from him and make appearances.
In post 231, roflcopter wrote:holy shit rapidcanyon is rolefishing so hard
In post 235, Cheery Dog wrote:The currently most active players are currently reading to me as town and thus Tangion is scum via PoE.
In post 258, rapidcanyon wrote:when it seems like Rofl is actually a viable lynch candidate,
In post 249, roflcopter wrote:but rapidcanyon is chainsaw defending him like nobody's business here so i am fully comfortable with killing rc first.
In post 315, Eidolon wrote:
I've seen it at my old site though i realize that it's not something common. i'd assume less common here than at my old site because that was more of a role madness type of place.
In post 321, Cheery Dog wrote:How does what movies someone has enjoyed in the past relate to someone's alignment?
In post 331, rapidcanyon wrote:I haven't given up for "no reason." I gave up because everybody and their dog is so sure that it is either me or TF that has to be lynched today
In post 346, numberQ wrote:Cheery vs rapid looks like town vs town to me.
In post 348, AngryPidgeon wrote:I dislike the major character analysis and[RC's]thought that Venmar being one means hes likely scum by PoE.
In post 149, Toon Fighter wrote:one person who is emitting scum vibes for me today is rofl. He immediately starts attacking rc for his nightkill speculation (which is not bad on itself, and could be useful), and spends the next few posts just defending Venmar, with no evidence whatsoever. scumbuddy much? vote: roflcopter
In post 369, rapidcanyon wrote:If Eidolon is town, she most certainly isn't going to vote based on such poor reasoning.
In post 374, rapidcanyon wrote:If TF flips scum, I am still going for Cheery.
In post 376, rapidcanyon wrote:Angry, WHY are you unvoting on a perfectly good wagon on Cheery? After rofl posted a couple of lines of BS? Are you really that gullible? I made about 1000 word long detailed case on why Cheery is scum. Let's lynch Cheery today. We'll see if Rofl can confirm himself tomorrow.
In post 378, roflcopter wrote:look, rapid, i was going back over your iso and i even found your little watcher breadcrumb you dropped (why didn't you point back to it when you claimed??). you should be watching me tonight because i am by far the most likely nightkill. if you do not you should be lynched tomorrow with extreme prejudice and i will be very disappointed in this town if they don't do just that.
In post 388, rapidcanyon wrote:Other possibility, TF is town, Rofl is scum or town and wrong.