Micro 21: Bird 7P GAME OVER

scooby · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:34 am

/confirm

scooby · Post Post #9 (isolation #1) » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:34 am

In post 7, FuDuzn wrote:Howdy Zab and Zach, and others I have never played with.

why did it take you so long to post here?

scooby · Post Post #11 (isolation #2) » Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:50 am

At what time did you confirm by PM?

scooby · Post Post #13 (isolation #3) » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:13 am

Answer the question.

Bonus question: how many games of mafia have you played?

scooby · Post Post #15 (isolation #4) » Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:21 am

I basically want to know if you are consistent on the behavior of posting only when ALL players have confirmed.

Back to you in 2 secs, let me check your post history.

scooby · Post Post #30 (isolation #5) » Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:21 pm

Ok, so I checked the last 4 gamers fudzn played and okay, it seems the guy thinks confirmation stage means no aditional posting.

In post 18, zabriel wrote:The day hadn't even begun. I only posted earlier because I wasn't sure when I'd have my laptop back. It's now incidentally.

Okay, so I normally go straight for FuDuzn, but I can already tell Scooby is going to be trouble.

VOTE: Scooby

Mmmmm, why do you already tell I am going to be trouble? Is it because I play an agressive style?

In post 19, Carbondioxide wrote:Ok, bonus online time for me too (family commitments momentarily postponed) seems we have a net access theme developing!

Scooby seems mighty keen to start finger pointing and/or cast suspicion but hasn't yet voted himself. To me that whiffs a bit of fishiness.

Vote: scooby

Well, game hadn't already started so I don't get how not voting for someone is suspicious to you.

Finally, Empking: why the heck am I scummy?

Vote: Empking

I really dislike the way Empking is pushing the scooby is suspicious with zero reasoning while at the same time voting for another player that suspects me.

scooby · Post Post #35 (isolation #6) » Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:30 am

In post 31, zabriel wrote:Because you were being insane in the Pregame, and you targetted Fu for being late to the thread when he arrived before you. There's aggressive, and then there's psychotic.

That was not the reason. My reason was that he had confirmed by PM but then he didn't post in thread until hours later. Since we had link acces to the game in our PMs I would expect people posting something after confirming.
Do you think thats psychotic?
If so, how does that make me scum and not simply an inquisitive player?

scooby · Post Post #36 (isolation #7) » Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:32 am

In post 32, Empking wrote:
In post 30, scooby wrote:I really dislike the way Empking is pushing the scooby is suspicious with zero reasoning while at the same time voting for another player that suspects me.

I['jm not pushing it, I mentio0ned it. You're scummy because you were producing a lot of noise and very little, if any, signal. I think that's a scumk ploy to get read as town for being active.

Ok, next time I would just lurk and then post strategically to then get read as scum not playing the game /sarcasm

Seriously, Emp, it was page fucking 1, what valid signal did you expect?

scooby · Post Post #37 (isolation #8) » Sun Sep 02, 2012 6:36 am

In post 33, Carbondioxide wrote:
In post 30, scooby wrote:
Well, game hadn't already started so I don't get how not voting for someone is suspicious to you.

As has been said, there's playing aggressively and then there's just downright weird. You leapt on FuDuzn, seemingly at random (he was 4th to confirm, after me (and others) but you got the angle-poise out and started an inquisition on him).

At first, it was a newbie oversight of mine that you hadn't voted as the day/game hadn't actually started... but in hindsight that's still odd. You seem to post a lot (as your spate of posting five times in a hour shows) but then, once you'd done some serious finger pointing, you fell silent.

It's gut instinct on my part but I think you were trying to give people an easy target to wagon early on (FuDuzn) — when everyone's random voting or looking for someone to vote for at the merest whiff of suspicion — but then didn't vote yourself, lest it be tracked back to you if/when FuDuzn turned out to be town ("flipped town"? I'm not up on my MS lingo yet).

Please answer same questions I asked to zabriel,.

Are you seriously attacking me for not posting at a constant rate?

The "I didnt vote" thing was issued earlier. Pay attention.

scooby · Post Post #40 (isolation #9) » Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:18 am

I confirmed by PM, clicked on the link, posted /confirm and then realized that FuDuzn posted ten minutes before my post, at 4:24 PM. At that time, the only person last to confirm was me.

When I asked at what time he had confirmed, he said that he had confirmed at 2:30ish. So I was interested in what FuDuzn was doing in those two hours previous to the start of the game.

scooby · Post Post #41 (isolation #10) » Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:24 am

I seriously cant believe I am being attacked for being:

a) being too aggresive. (EMpking)

b) not posting at a 1 post per hour rate. (catbon)

c) people that DO NOT understand a page 1 case. (zabriel)

Who is the SCUM here?

scooby · Post Post #52 (isolation #11) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:48 am

I suggest people voting Carbon to reaffirm if he is their top suspect so he can claim in next post.

scooby · Post Post #54 (isolation #12) » Mon Sep 03, 2012 9:49 am

next top suspect, Emp?

scooby · Post Post #77 (isolation #13) » Thu Sep 06, 2012 4:23 pm

So saulres became obvtown. (scum obviously know this is lylo, so they wouldnt have voted like saulres did)

I guess we should probably massclaim, its lylo, etc.

Also, this fore EVERYONE IN NEXT POST: who are the people you suspect?

scooby · Post Post #104 (isolation #14) » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:08 am

In post 79, saulres wrote:scooby, why do you keep asking people for their reads without giving any of your own?

I thought I was clear on my suspects since day 1. In post 41, I clearly say that there has to be one scum in the (Empking, carbon, zabriel) derp attacks.

So yeah, Im thinking Empking is scum here.

I have also clearly said that you are likely town here, so I'm FAR from not giving any of my reads.

scooby · Post Post #105 (isolation #15) » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:13 am

In post 78, Zachrulez wrote:Yeah, massclaim should happen.

Which is all I'll say until we either do so, or establish that we're not mass claiming.

Just for the record, talking about massclaim strategy was a fucking terrible idea. Zach is scummy here for not having reinforced his idea and let this shit happen.

scooby · Post Post #106 (isolation #16) » Sat Sep 08, 2012 3:15 am

The doc cant hide in a lylo game where we are about to lynch a scum, since that scum is extremely likely to claim doc to avoid lynch.

So we massclaim now.

scooby · Post Post #107 (isolation #17) » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:20 am

In fact, Im willing to start. Im vanilla. Next.

scooby · Post Post #108 (isolation #18) » Sat Sep 08, 2012 4:20 am

Empking

scooby · Post Post #113 (isolation #19) » Sun Sep 09, 2012 1:46 pm

scooby · Post Post #134 (isolation #20) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:43 pm

Vote: Empking

willing to go 1-1 on this bitch

scooby · Post Post #138 (isolation #21) » Mon Sep 10, 2012 4:41 pm

In post 136, saulres wrote:
In post 134, scooby wrote:willing to go 1-1

What does that mean?

This means that Im fucking sure Empking is scum here.

Since he attacked me day 1 for weak reasons (I know I am town, so one of the three people that attacked me day 1 must be scum and Emp is the only one alive now) and now that he attacks you for "claim delaying".

CLAIM.DELAYING.

Seriously.

scooby · Post Post #144 (isolation #22) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:22 pm

well, Im town

so if Fudzn is town, then its gg

scooby · Post Post #145 (isolation #23) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:24 pm

ok, so all players have posted after my vote

this likely means that one of me and empking is scum, so yeah, I was right

scooby · Post Post #147 (isolation #24) » Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:33 pm

Fudzn, if you are town, unvote now because yeah we are loke about to lose