For being meta evasive.
Labor day weekend. We're probably going to be looking for stuff to do, so don't expect me to be around much until Tuesday.
In post 59, Carbondioxide wrote:Wow... so I'm L-1... and now I should claim? Sorry to pull the "I'm new" card (again) but... I'm new. How does claiming work? Surely, even if I was scum I'd say "Oh yes, I claim... I'm Vanilla Townie, 'onest guv'nor." (or words to that effect). Or is false claiming an MS no-no?
Screw it.CLAIM:I'm Vanilla Townie.
Not sure how I prove that but it's true. I'm guessing that makes me a shade safer from the scum, as they'll be after the power players... but not sure I feel that great about narrowing the field for them to hit a power townie in.
In post 79, saulres wrote:Zach: Please explain why you quickhammered on page 3 instead of prolonging discussion and scumhunting.
In post 97, FuDuzn wrote:You asked me how we can win without outting the doc toDay, and I answered with various situations where the odds are better for town to win without outting the doc. If I had an airtight plan that guaranteed to work plan I would lay it all out, all I have is odds that tell me outting the doc toDay is a bad idea.
And please anwer the question yoursel, why is outting the doc a good idea?
Pre Edit: Yes a mislynch means we lose, and I do see that outting the doc does make odds better of hitting scum toDay. But then Tomorrow it puts us in a potentially much worse position then if we kept the doc hidden.
In post 114, saulres wrote:FuDuzn,
First, that's not how popcorning works (not that I'm sure when we agreed to popcorning). You're supposed to ask your scummiest suspect to go next. Do you really think I'm scummier than Zach, who has done nothing this game other than hammer a townie?
I want Zach claiming before I do.
In post 101, saulres wrote:Zach, I'm not seeing any pro-town actions from you at all. In the post you hammered Carbon, you expressed suspicion of our two flipped townies and no one else. I remember your reads being better; is my memory at fault?
In post 121, saulres wrote:In post 120, Zachrulez wrote:Don't really like iso 61 looking back where he says he's convinced Carbon is town but is willing to lynch him nontheless. Seems like trying to have it both ways.
Why didn't you say that when you did your catchup hammer post? Here's what you said about Emp:
In post 67, Zachrulez wrote:And now lynching anyone else is the suboptimal play. (Empking touched on the risk of outing power, which can happen outright, and also by outing vanillas to scum. That's why not lynching vanilla claims is a terrible idea.)
In post 153, saulres wrote:Dammit! I had FuDuzn pegged as my top scumspect when I sent in my protection last night.
And who did I protect? For various reasons, which I can copy-paste tomorrow if you want -- Zach.
Tonight I was going to protect Scooby if I wasn't outed.
With Empking and Scooby going at each other, we didn't stand a chance today. I can't believe in a seven-player game, one scum could lurk to victory.
In post 155, Carbondioxide wrote:Hello. Well played Zach & Fuz (and everyone else too). This was my first game on MS. Quite gutted to be lynched on D1 but safe to say I learned some things - especially about claiming and 'having' to do it.
I'd be grateful for any tips/advice/comments y'all had on my play - either here on in PM. Thanks in advance.
In post 153, saulres wrote:Dammit! I had FuDuzn pegged as my top scumspect when I sent in my protection last night.
And who did I protect? For various reasons, which I can copy-paste tomorrow if you want -- Zach.
In post 153, saulres wrote:Tonight I was going to protect Scooby if I wasn't outed.
In post 164, saulres wrote:
In post 162, Zachrulez wrote:Your reaction to Empking suggesting massclaim made your role obvious to me before we even actually massclaimed.
It did? Could you tell me why? Is outing the doc really the way to go in this situation?
In post 167, saulres wrote:Zach in the scum QT wrote:Saulres and Zabriel felt like they were playing under the radar. (Didn't see anything that looked like an apparent breadcrumb.
If I was staking on it, I'd say they have the highest chance of being power roles.
I don't think I was playing under the radar, but I did leave a breadcrumb
In post 169, FuDuzn wrote:What I am most proud about this game is neither Zach nor I were in any real danger of being lynched.
In post 171, saulres wrote:FuDuzn, you were my top read going into the night. When the new day started, I forgot it was LyLo and thought Empking was scum for asking us to massclaim. In LyLo I'm even more cautious than usual, and even if you were my top scumread, I analyze again and again. I reread (multiple times) the vote you made and unmade on Empking and finally decided it could have been an honest mistake instead of scumminess.
Then after I made my initial questions, I intentionally sat back to see how people reacted to conversation. Unfortunately instead of discussion, it quickly got into votes, and it was too late.
What I should have done was push Zach more. But I think if we went into Day 3 with you, Emp, and Scooby, we would have lost anyway the way they were going at each other.