In post 296, thdgkdms wrote:PS. Chocola, still think you're more full of bullshit than Om of the Nom is.
Anyway, busy. But don't worry, I'll be back with something even more interesting sometime later.
In post 293, Om of the Nom wrote:Ugh, you're all fucking terrible at this shit and I'm beginning to doubt my sanity at the time of accepting the invitation to this game.
@Mod: I'd like to replace out.
I didn't play this game to be yelled at, constantly called dumb and not even given a chance. I don't need to deal with this sort of shit.
If all you guys were going to do is hate on me, then don't fucking invite me next time.
Holy persecution complex Batman. I'd rather you not replace out, but do you seriously think that people are voting you because of a grudge or something? A good number of the people suspecting you have never played with you, as Manju said. Seriously, grow a spine and man up, and stop assuming that people are out to get you for out-of-game reasons. Who isn't giving you a chance? Manju who you happen to be voting and supposedly think is scum? Did you get quicklynched out of the gate? No. Are people voting you for "policy lulz"? No. Seriously. 
Yeah, Om, actually I'd really appreciate it if you stuck in. I know you like tactical replace outs as scum so I really want to make sure this isn't happening here.In post 269, Working Manju wrote:
"you assumed scum then made a case" can be applied to most early votes that stick after the target posts stronger content. i thought om was ed1 suspicious and his contentpost did nothing to make him town and was even Scummy.
In post 259, mrfrobozzo wrote:If he thought you were scum trying to discredit his reads wouldn't it make sense for him to buff up what might otherwise be brushed off as a weak case?
if he's town he's trying to sell it to the fellow townies, not the guy he thinks is scum. if somebody is trying to discredit another player then that's good enough for an ed1 vote and he shouldn't need to twist it for people to look into why that person is scummy. overjustification not being a universal scumtell doesn't mean it isn't scummy here
Pretty sure you're missing the point here. You brought up that Om was overjustifying his vote and you thought he was scummy for it. Well, you were overjustifying your vote on Om by including a lot of weak potshots that I addressed earlier. So basically the two of you are two sides of the same coin. See what I mean?
Eh, Manju's reaction to Om's replace out looks kinda townie? It'd be pretty easy for Manju to just barrel on full force and firebomb that slot for lolAtE, although what Manju's doing could be an easy out for him to remove his vote from Om. Eh, I dunno. But I agree with the BT vote actually. Don't know what the point of the two queries to Manju was; not sure if just trying to look busy or trying to subtly throw dirt on Manju.In post 291, BT wrote:VOTE: Rylai Crestfall
Tentative lurker prod. He promised content today, right?
In post 302, mrfrobozzo wrote:
In post 291, BT wrote:VOTE: Rylai Crestfall
Tentative lurker prod. He promised content today, right?
Yesterday, actually. Let's take bets on when he shows up.
I almost lost face for a moment there. Good though I caught myself, whew.
In post 304, Working Manju wrote:i get what you mean now but am not sure when my case was every really based around potshots - as far as main points are concerned, ed1 it was the reads, later it was his padding
The reads part I addressed in my post a few pages back if you're talking about the Dan or frobozz/Manju reads, and I think they qualified as potshots. But w/e.In post 304, Working Manju wrote:
also, for the sake of comparision, when has om attempted tactical replace outs as scum before?
I don't know how often he does it as scum vs as town, but I was specifically thinking of these two games. I think the circumstance in this game reads a little different though. In post 306, Chocola wrote:Current reads are:
I haven't had much luck in getting town or scum vibes from bozzo, to note.
I'm not a doll. I'm very much alive!
I imagine neutral is the same as unreadable? 
In post 298, Working Manju wrote:question bt. what are your actual thoughts on the chocola / thdgkdms argument as far as alignment is concerned? if everybody else already talked about it like you said there's no reason to admonish them yet again if you're not gonna talk about what you gained from the argument, seems like padding
In post 302, mrfrobozzo wrote:But I agree with the BT vote actually. Don't know what the point of the two queries to Manju was; not sure if just trying to look busy or trying to subtly throw dirt on Manju.
In post 308, mrfrobozzo wrote:In post 306, Chocola wrote:Current reads are:
I haven't had much luck in getting town or scum vibes from bozzo, to note.
In post 302, mrfrobozzo wrote:
In post 1447, Om of the Nom wrote:Ugh, sorry guys, my motivation has really gone down for this game and I'm not putting in anywhere near as much effort as I should be. I'm considering replacing out, but if you guys want me to I'll try to keep going.
In post 2609, Om of the Nom wrote:Congrats to town, it sucks that we lost
I'm sorry I had to replace out, I seriously started to lose motivation and couldn't keep up.
I noticed some discussion about what I said right before I replaced out. But what I said was actually true. I generally tend to replace out more as scum (though I'm not so sure if it's so true now) but my mention of townie replacing out in Large games was also true, since the only other Large Theme I've played in I replaced out D1 as town.
