Should a vig who shoots N1 be Modkilled?

[hasdgfas]

The point is, you're proposing something that no sensible player would ever do.

Exactly. No sensible player would ever shoot N1 OR shoot an innocent child, so they are equal.

Do you mean a night before any days, or do you mean a night after day 1? Because if the latter, it's definitely sensible to shoot. If the former, it could still be sensible if there is a well-known anti-town player in the game.

[hasdgfas]

It feels fine. At least I can see the reasons for it.

However, due to the varying opposing positions, there are some logical flaws.

FTR, I do mean N1, not N0, but N0 is another interesting choice.

You are effectively making the argument that including a vig is a mod error, and are thusly encouraging the mod to make up for his or her error by killing the innocent player.

It's not necessarily a mod error. However, unless there is some pretty damning D1 evidence (CC in an open game), a single shmuck with reads should not be deciding the fate of another player.

Fully disagree with this. If I'm a vig, I prefer my reads to the reads of the town as a whole

I seriously do support N0 vigging.

Here it seems that many people think that are thinking a mod should allow a player to kill an innocent player instead of a mod.

Strawman.

How often do you get the opportunity to be a vig?

Mafia Goon is indistinguishable from Vig, so it's not that uncommon.

...