Mini 81 - Gamersville II

nard054 · Post Post #16 (isolation #0) » Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:26 pm

/confirm

nard054 · Post Post #29 (isolation #1) » Tue Dec 30, 2003 6:47 am

I'm here, but I don't like to random vote....just not my cup o' tea.

nard054 · Post Post #34 (isolation #2) » Wed Dec 31, 2003 5:24 am

Thats some pretty complicated logic...I've read it 10 times and i still barely understand it....

Vote: AniX

nard054 · Post Post #48 (isolation #3) » Sat Jan 03, 2004 4:24 pm

I usually vote for people with fuzzy logic, but since it was a joke...

unvote: Anix

nard054 · Post Post #73 (isolation #4) » Sat Jan 10, 2004 6:33 am

Melchizedek, say something (or else you get my vote)!

nard054 · Post Post #82 (isolation #5) » Sun Jan 11, 2004 6:33 am

I'm not even giving him a full day. As much as I don't wanna be the last nail in the coffin, whats the good in keeping around someone who won't even post?

nard054 · Post Post #96 (isolation #6) » Tue Jan 13, 2004 1:49 pm

Morpheus wrote:After you said that why didn't you vote for him.

Morpheus wrote:Everyone was too afraid they were going to lynch a townie and they didn't want to draw suspisions.

You pretty much just answered your own question. And I wanted to give Mel a chance to defend himself.

Vote: Quagmire

only because the bandwagons for you two (Quag and Anix) at the beginning of the game still seems a little scummy to me.

nard054 · Post Post #124 (isolation #7) » Mon Jan 19, 2004 8:57 am

AniX wrote:You guys really need to learn that just because someone isn't "uniform", doesn't mean they are mafia.

You seem uniform in a different way. I see it as "I'll act differently then people will suspect me, then I'll shut down their argument by saying that if I was mafia i'd be doing a lousy job."

And since my vote for Quag was simply for the "does anyone have anything to report" comment...

unvote: Quagmire, vote: anix

nard054 · Post Post #142 (isolation #8) » Mon Jan 26, 2004 2:21 pm

I think the extra kill could be due to a vigilante.

What do you mean by that? (And I'm not trying to play the ignorance card, I just don't know what it means)

nard054 · Post Post #147 (isolation #9) » Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:10 pm

quagmire wrote:
Perhaps we have some kind of 2 serial killer combo? One kills on even nights, the other on odd?

An interesting suggestion. They would have to be working together, because sk's have a hard enough time winning as it is. Its worth going back and checking bloojay's posts though.

But that still doesn't explain the inconsistancy of kills per night...

If it was an alternating SK combination, wouldn't there still be two kills each night?

nard054 · Post Post #150 (isolation #10) » Thu Jan 29, 2004 2:40 pm

After skimming over the original Gamersville, I don't think that this one has the same type of roles. I didn't read it thoroughly though, just read the roles.

A cop coming out would help immensely. I'm completely in the dark with this one...

nard054 · Post Post #156 (isolation #11) » Sat Jan 31, 2004 5:08 am

Five days without posting does seem a little extreme. I checked the limited access thread (nothing there) and his previous posts. He hasn't posted on the site since the 27th, not in this game since the 26th. It does seem quite odd to me.

nard054 · Post Post #161 (isolation #12) » Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:41 pm

Thats what I'm leaning towards right now. There are no cops left (it would be the perfect role to claim right now, and i doubt anyone would pass that up). There are most likely two seperate killers, whether SKs or scum, and for some reason I don't see them as scum.

nard054 · Post Post #164 (isolation #13) » Mon Feb 02, 2004 10:01 am

I'd also like to know that. Both Breakdown and CurtainDog have suspected Jadesmar but I'm not sure why. Am I missing something?

nard054 · Post Post #169 (isolation #14) » Tue Feb 03, 2004 10:13 am

FoS: Breakdown

for telling us who he suspects and not giving a reason (even if it was right in the middle of the super bowl) and then keeping us waiting. Maybe he doesn't have a valid reason?

nard054 · Post Post #172 (isolation #15) » Wed Feb 04, 2004 11:29 am

CurtainDog wrote:
All I'm saying is if I had to make a prediction on who was evil in this game I'd go with him.

Sadly, CurtainDog, if you are on the town's side, you pretty much have to make a prediction on who is evil.

I don't agree that that was a slip like you said. I just think that he was saying "if i were forced to make a choice right now on the spot, I would pick jadesmar"

Am I correct in assuming this CurtainDog?

nard054 · Post Post #175 (isolation #16) » Thu Feb 05, 2004 10:50 am

Just giving my opinion. I thought he was falsely accused.

nard054 · Post Post #179 (isolation #17) » Fri Feb 06, 2004 9:42 am

I can't really see a strategy to improve our odds, can anyone do better?

Pretty simple really...lynch a SK.

Do I have any leads? None that can be supported.

nard054 · Post Post #181 (isolation #18) » Sat Feb 07, 2004 10:31 am

Right now I have nothing relevant to post other than that my computer is in the process of breaking and my internet connection isn't working that well. So depending on whether or not I can fix this problem, I may or may not be able to post over the next few days.

nard054 · Post Post #187 (isolation #19) » Thu Feb 12, 2004 9:01 am

I'm starting to really suspect Jadesmar. As soon as CD gave a reason to suspect Jadesmar, he reacted with a vote to Jadesmar and became very defensive.

I will hold my vote until Jadesmar defends himself, but if the defense is not good, I will vote.

nard054 · Post Post #191 (isolation #20) » Fri Feb 13, 2004 12:12 pm

jadesmar wrote:
CurtainDog wrote:All I'm saying is if I had to make a prediction on who was evil in this game I'd go with him.
Sadly, CurtainDog, if you are on the town's side, you pretty much have to make a prediction on who is evil.

Vote: CurtainDog

For this potentially Freudian slip and the previous vigilante theory. Plus the "jadesmar is doing exactly what I did, he must be scum" theory. Ok, not worded (and probably not felt) that strongly but, come on man.

I would also like to hear from Breakdown about the "jadesmar is evil" theory.

People were only suspecting you. A simple explanation would have sufficed. Instead, you vote because of a Freudian slip that I think was blown out of proportion. I don't think it was a good enough to reason to vote when it's imperative to lynch scum (or a SK). You also didn't really give a CD and oppurtunity to defend himself. You just threw the vote out there.

nard054 · Post Post #198 (isolation #21) » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:46 am

There is one vote on him. There has been one vote on him for a week or two now. I know, it's my vote. He can defend himself all he likes.

My point was that you didn't give him time to defend before you voted.

But you squashed my other arguments pretty well. So I'm not suspicious enough to vote anyone...

nard054 · Post Post #199 (isolation #22) » Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:48 am

(That last post was directed @ Jadesmar BTW)

nard054 · Post Post #202 (isolation #23) » Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:30 pm

Go for it. This game is getting pretty monotonous.

nard054 · Post Post #209 (isolation #24) » Thu Feb 19, 2004 1:48 pm

I've also had the same problems as Quag (although I have two brothers to deal with as well).

Anyway, I know we confirmed that there were no cops. That's inaccurate. I'm a cop. The reason I didn't come out before was because I had info on only one player (CD) and I wanted to see if anyone else claimed the role and catch them in a lie. And when that didn't happen I just decided it was in my best interest to lay low until a mass role claim (such as this) came about.

Back to my info on CD. He is in fact a townie. (which is why I was defending him).

I'm actually suspecting Breakdown right now. It was clever instigating a role claim...and he might have done it just to throw us off.

nard054 · Post Post #217 (isolation #25) » Sat Feb 21, 2004 5:08 am

I have to agree with that. I've thought there were two unconnected killers since the beginning of the day.

Right now, I know its not myself or CurtainDog. So right now the three in my suspicions are, obviously, jadesmar, quag, and breakdown. I'm leaning toward Quagmire telling the truth with his claim right now.

nard054 · Post Post #219 (isolation #26) » Sat Feb 21, 2004 11:16 am

Right now it makes the most sense. If you did in fact block him (or have the ability to block in the first place) on night one, then he is most likely a SK.

As for the psychopath role, it seems that it is a SK role, but we can't be certain.

nard054 · Post Post #228 (isolation #27) » Tue Feb 24, 2004 12:32 pm

I agree his night choices are quite odd....but fos: breakdown for quickly voting after CD.

nard054 · Post Post #232 (isolation #28) » Wed Feb 25, 2004 1:57 pm

I know at least one of them has to be scum (and I use that term loosely because of the SKs about) and frankly i'm not sure of either, so I'll

vote: Breakdown

and let Jadesmar decide. No need to thank me.

nard054 · Post Post #236 (isolation #29) » Thu Feb 26, 2004 11:51 am

*does the same*

nard054 · Post Post #241 (isolation #30) » Sat Feb 28, 2004 6:26 am

How so?

nard054 · Post Post #244 (isolation #31) » Sun Feb 29, 2004 4:28 am

So what do you two think about the death scene? It sounds like a double kill but I don't think thats the case. I mean I know I'm not scum and I know CD isn't scum, so that leaves Quag....but something just doesn't make sense to me right now.

nard054 · Post Post #246 (isolation #32) » Sun Feb 29, 2004 6:21 am

I was thinking about that too...but the more I think about it the more I can see the chance of there being only one killer left. This is gonna take a few more read-throughs.

nard054 · Post Post #247 (isolation #33) » Sun Feb 29, 2004 12:24 pm

After many many deep-thinking sessions (

), I've come to the conclusion that I'm not scum.

And with that comes the conclusion that CD is not scum (because I've looked into it)

So, it leaves me with an obvious choice:

vote: Quagmire

nard054 · Post Post #251 (isolation #34) » Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:32 am

Why thank you. I think. Beats me really. You could be another psycho. Who knows? I've been pretty much clueless through this whole game.

nard054 · Post Post #255 (isolation #35) » Wed Mar 03, 2004 11:04 am

I don't quite understand -- were the psychopaths a mafia group or were they separate SKs?

Seperate SKs that could opt not to kill, but if they chose no kill, there would be a decreased chance of surviving an attempt on their life.

Did not expect for that to happen. My claim had more holes than swiss cheese.

nard054 · Post Post #259 (isolation #36) » Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:07 pm

Yeah...I sensed that it was coming so I threw my vote out there. I'm still amazed at how I guessed that you were a townie, CD. But I figured you were either a townie or psychopath, so you would've apprecieated it either way.