dahen wrote:
I state here three things.
1. It can happen that I am suspicious of Glork even though he is town.
2. The lack of kills and return to Thok suggest a role-blocker and is pro-Glork.
3. Glork was fast with his claim, which I think speaks in his favor too (too refers to as in addition to no 2).
I like PJ's idea of lynching the common person within the pairings, but his suggestion is to lynch VitaminR. Since I don't think a Glork+Klebian thing here is very likely I'd want Klebian to try to convince me why Fritz isn't viable.
And another thing, Klebian - how sure are you that Glork is scum, and why?
OK: First, to your 3 points: The only one that I may agree with is number 2. However, I'm not exactly sure I know what you mean when you say 'return to Thok'
I can basically combine the 2nd and 3rd points. I believe your crumb, so I believe you to be town. I am quite sure PJ is town. This leaves VitR, Fritz, and Glork. Thus, There are three pairings: Glork/Vit, Glork/Fritz, Fritz/Vit. Essentially, you are asking me how sure I am that the pairing is not Fritz/Vit, and why Glork/Vit is more viable than anything else.
How sure am I that Glork is scum, and thus the pairing is not Fritz/Vit? Well, for glork and I to both be innocent, masterchief must have had a role that can prevent a kill. Also, each of glork's blocks must have 'missed'. Night 6 he blocked Fritz, and Night 7 he blocked VitR. If glork is innocent, then the pairing is Fritz/Vit. This means that the night glork blocked vit, fritz made the kill, and vice versa. This itself is only a 1/4 chance: that the scum are alternating kills the reverse pattern as glork was alternating his block. Also, glork has been taking this day in the sense that masterchief's role is not a viable factor in the lack of a n4 kill. I have got the feeling that glork is making the situation as if it's either me or him. Thus, I am fairly sure glork is scum, but if he's not, then we've just had bad luck.
Why is fritz not viable? Well, I've never said that he isn't, but I do think that glork being scum basically makes vitamin scum. I have got the feeling from his posts that he is posting from a point of view that he believes glork, which, if they are scumbuddies, can be distanced (I hope I'm using the correct word here) by just saying that he believes glork. However,
if
we lynch fritz then:
1) He is scum. His partner is VitaminR. Glork blocks either me or vitamin. If there is no kill, then, as said, we have 5 people and can make 2 lynches with a maximum of 1 scum left. Otherwise, someone is cleared.
2) He is scum. His partner is glork. Glork pretends to block someone. Depending on how he feels, he will either kill, or not kill, someone. If he doesn't kill, he will say he blocked me. You will lynch me, I will turn up town, and then lynch glork the next day. If he kills someone, then I will be cleared (because I feel that if we are lynching fritz, glork will be blocking me if he comes up scum). I feel that glork will be on the chopping block if this happens, so I don't think this scenario (of fritz being scum, and there being a nightkill tonight) is feasible.
3) He is town. Scum are glork and vitamin. We lose.
So from my point of view, lynching fritz is bad because if he is town, we lose. However, lynching vitaminR gives the same result. That is why I am not able to vote anyone other than glork.
Regarding the PMs. I really don't see any more differences that have not been pointed out. All that I haven't mentioned, (but I don't think you're looking for this) is that glork mentioned he had no weapons but I personally have weapons, I'm just out of ammo. I don't think we should be going more in depth with this, and I agree that using role PMs, at any rate, is a very lazy way to make decisions.
Now, I'd also like fritz to respond to that question. And VitR, why are you not considering a scumgroup of fritz + glork?