NY 171: An Education in Telling Jokes (Game Over!)

Antihero · Post Post #2834 (isolation #0) » Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:29 am

114 pages... what are the juicy parts?

Antihero · Post Post #2836 (isolation #1) » Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:42 am

we're mass claiming?

Antihero · Post Post #2837 (isolation #2) » Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:42 am

i'm a nurse

what are the other claims?

Antihero · Post Post #2838 (isolation #3) » Tue Apr 29, 2014 2:05 pm

alright, i read up the last few pages / first few pages and i think i'm up with the current situation. i have to agree with yates; we really ought to lynch. for one, there could be only 1 more scum left (all scum PRs so far) and for another, the only thing that's going to happen is elyse or i's going to die and then it'll just be the exact same situation tomorrow minus one more set of eyes.

i'll do some ISO's and ctrl+f's of scum/alive players.

elyse, what are you thinking? any parts of interest in particular i should see?

Antihero · Post Post #2840 (isolation #4) » Tue Apr 29, 2014 3:38 pm

mulled it over and i actually agree with the no lynch. odd numbers are better for town and it's actually better that my slot's not here because my reads probably aren't going to be as good as people who've been here the whole time anyway.

does anyone actually think highly enough of me as a player to value the half-baked reads i would get or should i just vote no lynch and get it over with?

Antihero · Post Post #2849 (isolation #5) » Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:14 am

In post 2843, Green Crayons wrote:So why did you originally want to no lynch?

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p5857348

In post 2846, Marquis wrote:Anti, are you scum or VT?

neither

how about you, scumbird? any insight for me?

Antihero · Post Post #2851 (isolation #6) » Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:18 am

what about it?

Antihero · Post Post #2856 (isolation #7) » Thu May 01, 2014 9:02 am

paraphrased:
the original role PM yates got was a VT one. but he also got at the start of d2 that said that since he was actually a nurse, he inherited the doctor's ability to protect.

since i thought we were in the middle of a massclaim (evidenced by how elyse abruptly asked me to claim and it's late in the game), i just used the one-word claim

yates protected marquis nights 2 and 3 and then protected elyse then on out.

Antihero · Post Post #2859 (isolation #8) » Thu May 01, 2014 4:28 pm

well, no one piped up

VOTE: no lynch

/burp

Antihero · Post Post #2881 (isolation #9) » Thu May 08, 2014 4:56 am

another large game i replace into late, another lylo that i'm not prepared for...

in the last page alone, green crayons looks p town and the "apathy" from ythan looks artificial (is GC the only scum or is he just saying that because of the PoE game we're in right now?).

Antihero · Post Post #2883 (isolation #10) » Thu May 08, 2014 5:06 am

In post 2882, Green Crayons wrote:
@Anti:

Do you agree with your predecessor's assessment that there is only 1 scum left? Why or why not.

at first blush, i thought it might be possible, but i've thought about it and i'm pretty sure it's 2. the scum PRs flips are pretty nerfed (limited shot, as opposed to full). extrapolating out from 10:3, 13:4 ratio, i think it's probable this game has 5 scum total.

Antihero · Post Post #2914 (isolation #11) » Sun May 11, 2014 5:43 am

In post 2905, Yates wrote:Fun fact: my role reveal was an accident. I was writing up a possible scenario to float in scum chat. Then I typed in my response to a different post. I accidentally copy and pasted the WHOLE THING instead of just my response.

Had to stick with it at that point. Kudos to Anti for pulling it off. Apologies to Anti and DN for putting you guys in that spot to begin with. We got lucky with our PR hunt kills. 3rd Mason would have ended the game for us.

the claim would have been just fine if you hadn't added the "secret" part to it. that part made it harder to fake and it didn't lend any credibility to the claim (it actually drew considerable scrutiny).