In post 798, Bins wrote:i'm pretty sure you're trolling now that everyone thinks that
First rule of mafia is to never openly admit every read you have, unless you're about to be lynched.
In post 798, Bins wrote:i'm pretty sure you're trolling now that everyone thinks that
In post 799, fuzzybutternut wrote:Desperado, Wicked - Please tell us what nights you "investigated" your targets.
In post 800, fuzzybutternut wrote:In post 798, Bins wrote:i'm pretty sure you're trolling now that everyone thinks that
First rule of mafia is to never openly admit every read you have, unless you're about to be lynched.
Wickedestjr wrote:If Titus was the seer then I think she would have claimed that by now. I seriously doubt that she's the seer...
Wickedestjr wrote:I'm honestly kinda surprised that I'm still alive too, but pleasantly surprised. But I think it's too early for you to consider that.If I'm alive on day 4 and haven't attracted suspicion, then I'll admit that would be pretty strange. I would understand if you considered lynching me then, but not now.
Wickedestjr wrote:Pretty confident that fuzzy is not a werewolf. The werewolf speculation yesterday + initiation of night kill discussion + Unsight vote don't make sense for him as werewolf. It makes more sense for him to hunt werewolves as mafia, cannot see the nightkill interest coming from someone who conducted the kill, and his question/vote in 551 regarding Unsight are both solid.
Wickedestjr wrote:Not_Mafia wrote:I figured out who the seer was from your counter wagoning, so yes there is and was a risk
1. I don't believe you - still think your seer preservation is disingenuous.
In post 787, Not_Mafia wrote:lolwut
VOTE: Desperado
I hated Wicked's push yesterday, and those are a pair of really poor investigative choices, bur I don't see why scum would CC that way
In post 806, Desperado wrote:How so Bins?
In post 808, Bins wrote:In post 806, Desperado wrote:How so Bins?
not much other than riddleton fkd up how many wws were in the game
In post 811, Desperado wrote:In post 808, Bins wrote:In post 806, Desperado wrote:How so Bins?
not much other than riddleton fkd up how many wws were in the game
A dumbtell? Seriously?
In post 807, Not_Mafia wrote:the Unsight case was awful and is an example of someone not wanting to let go of their their pet read instead of making a investigative choice that would benefit town as a whole.
Not_Mafia wrote:Splash would at least be a useful not-wolf inno as the slot has been a giant ?
In post 641, Wickedestjr wrote:Firstly, only a werewolf would want to out the Seer. Secondly, Unsight is making too many assumptions here (that Bulge crumbed seer AND that scum would have noticed AND that scum would have nightkilled him if they thought he was seer) - the combination of weak assumptions here doesn't match the confidence that Unsight has in his belief that Bulge is a werewolf. Thirdly, Unsight completely ignores the rest of Bulge's play up until now despite calling him scum. This is the kind of accusation that says "I'm not a werewolf because I'm speculating about their nightkill, also lets all vote the potential seer!" and it's bothersome that he and Desperado are two of the major forces behind it.
In post 822, Riddleton wrote:I don't think you should have cc'ed wicked. It was obvious he was lying anyway.