In post 10, acryon wrote:
Fair enough.This is the first game where I have actually been here at the very start, so I'm glad I am here to ask the hard-hitting questions right off the bat!
Same.
Hello, everybody. This should be fun.
In post 10, acryon wrote:
Fair enough.This is the first game where I have actually been here at the very start, so I'm glad I am here to ask the hard-hitting questions right off the bat!
In post 17, acryon wrote:Hey Newbie,
I see you played one game when you signed up and got killed pretty quickly and appear to be in two now. How much of a newbie are you actually? Much IRL experience?
In post 16, Wisdom wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: mathdino
Hi Newbie, how do you feel about voting Mathdino with us?
In post 27, Wisdom wrote:In post 24, Newbie wrote:
Honestly, I know people here do joke votes on the first day, but where I'm from, the time limit is much smaller so we get serious pretty quickly. Therefore, I will not throw out a vote until more people begin to post and things get rolling and then I can start analyzing.
Those "joke" votes can get things serious pretty quickly too, don't you think?
In post 28, Mathdino wrote:Well Newbie, that explains your wallposting, haha. Are there any records left of one of your scum games and town games?
@wgeurts: RVS wagons can be good ways of getting reactions out of people. Why so concerned?
In post 45, Mathdino wrote:@wgeurts: Yet if everyone did that, nothing would happen, haha. I used to hate RVS but it's important for reaction fishing.
^Not liking RVS isn't a scumtell though, if anything it's a noobtowntell IMO.
@Victor: So that way when I inevitably ISO Newbie I'll have a meta to compare to. I don't want to bother waiting until Newbie's got a wagon on (him? her?) to skim a meta.
@Newbie: Yeah linking would cool, thanks.
@acryon: I'm not gonna get random-lynched and I'm really bad at feeling anything during games, haha. Talk to me after the game and I'll let out the rage.
Not really sure what you want me to say to "Why are you town?" other than I got a town PM. I'm not going to self-meta (I don't even have a scum meta yet) and I don't appreciate people trying to prove how town they are since it's easily WIFOM'd.
Edit: ^Written before post #38, gimme a sec.
In post 41, wgeurts wrote:In post 40, Wisdom wrote:In post 36, wgeurts wrote:In post 22, Wisdom wrote:Because I like wagons. How do you feel about that?
Not good.
What are you going to do about that?
Vote you as this is not sitting well with me.
VOTE: Wisdom
In post 48, wgeurts wrote:In post 46, Mathdino wrote:Yeah now that you point that out, Wis, it kinda looks like Victor's fishing for anything "suspicious" that may not actually be scummy. Would've labeled that noobtown behaviour but the join date says otherwise.
FoS: that guy
@wgeurts: Wis got us out of RVS, which you don't seem to like much. If anything that's useful town behaviour; don't vote someone because you don't like their playstyle.
I'm not, it's all a reaction test. For one you took it well by labeling me as newb and moving on. This is slightly town from you as you could have jumped on my BS reasons.
Anyway, there's nothing to gain here.
UNVOTE: Wisdom
In post 126, wgeurts wrote:In post 124, Newbie wrote:In post 41, wgeurts wrote:In post 40, Wisdom wrote:In post 36, wgeurts wrote:In post 22, Wisdom wrote:Because I like wagons. How do you feel about that?
Not good.
What are you going to do about that?
Vote you as this is not sitting well with me.
VOTE: Wisdom
As you can see from the bolded, Wisdom challenged wgeurts to do something about his discomfort of wagons. He most likely didn't expect that kind of response from Wisdom, and he kind of had no choice but to vote Wisdom since it would've looked bad not to back up his words after he put on a show of showing strong dislike towards Wisdom's random lynch in the first place.
In post 48, wgeurts wrote:In post 46, Mathdino wrote:Yeah now that you point that out, Wis, it kinda looks like Victor's fishing for anything "suspicious" that may not actually be scummy. Would've labeled that noobtown behaviour but the join date says otherwise.
FoS: that guy
@wgeurts: Wis got us out of RVS, which you don't seem to like much. If anything that's useful town behaviour; don't vote someone because you don't like their playstyle.
I'm not, it's all a reaction test. For one you took it well by labeling me as newb and moving on. This is slightly town from you as you could have jumped on my BS reasons.
Anyway, there's nothing to gain here.
UNVOTE: Wisdom
With a little heat, he caved and unlynched, falling back on the explanation of reaction fishing. Lol. He even admits that his reasons were BS from the jump, but covered it up well with a "you're definitely town because you reacted a certain way to my sketchy reasoning, sketchy reasoning I definitely did on purpose."
vote: wgeurts
Yeah, sketchy reasoning I forsaw umm... before I actually voted him.
I must be a psychic or something to see the future, yeah psychic scum. Y'all gonna die.
In post 131, wgeurts wrote:You do know I already said they were weak as heck in or shortly after the vote and before pressure?
I beg you haven't even truely read all my posts and you jumped on me using others reasoning and some made up crumpets.
In post 132, wgeurts wrote:Also, if you've read my votes after that my intent was to get us out of RVS and the vote was a tool. Please meta read me and you will see this, votes are tools while needed and weapons once the time comes.
In post 133, wgeurts wrote:Haha, yeah I'm right. A quick ISO has shown you've done no scum hunting and literally just jumped on me out of the blue once people discussed my play. Yeah, I'm happy with my vote.
In post 65, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 54, wgeurts wrote:
Reasons for the wagon?
The only motivation I can think of is a reaction-test.
You missed the more obvious answer.
In post 55, acryon wrote:In post 52, VictorDeAngelo wrote:Why not let him answer for himself?
And since when does questioning players this early become anti-town? Is it OK for Mathdino to get information but somehow scummy for me?
It completely depends on intent and outcome. I think Mathdino's intent was to establish a play-style for Newbie which he could compare to Newbie's play as the game goes on, so as to avoid writing off Newbie's actions as newb-scum or newb-town. This is a good intent and a favorable outcome for town, as it potentially helps us avoid a mislynch based on bad information. I'm not sure what your intent was, but the outcome for town from your question is that he answers exactly as he did, but then others may avoid those types of questions in fear of being scrutinized, which is overall a negative for town. Not that I think your question carried the kind of weight to make an impact quite like that, but I do think it discourages certain forms of questioning.
That's a lot of guesswork there Acryon. I highly doubt that me asking a question about why someone wanted meta will have others quaking in their boots to question for meta. And this doesn't really answer why you couldn't just wait to see how Mathdino responded.
In post 59, Mathdino wrote:I've played with a Mala hydra but that's it, which is why I as a relative newcomer have a lot of meta to catch up on. Also I think I played with Duke but the game was abandoned before he posted.
Victor, how many answers to your question would even be possible?
Lots. The question was open ended and I even got a interesting reaction off Acryon to boot. I'm mostly curious as to why Newbie's meta was more valuable to you than others.
I guess what I'm asking is, what were you expecting?
Fun fact, I often ask question I don't know the answer to.
In post 62, Wisdom wrote:In post 52, VictorDeAngelo wrote:In post 34, acryon wrote:In post 32, VictorDeAngelo wrote:
I don't love when people seem to question others for trying to get information. Seems anti-town. He was trying to find out some information, whichtendsto be useful for scum-hunting. Wouldn't you agree?
Why not let him answer for himself?
And since when does questioning players this early become anti-town? Is it OK for Mathdino to get information but somehow scummy for me?
Mathdino tried to get information. You questioned why he wants to get information (which is obvious). That doesn't look like an attempt to get information on your part.
I didn't question why he wanted information, I questioned why he wanted that specific information. There is a difference.
In post 63, Wisdom wrote:In post 53, VictorDeAngelo wrote:Also, I have new person I want wagon.
VOTE: wgeurts
Everyone get aboard.
Why?
It leads to a party where there's Jelly and ice cream - want some?
In post 73, VictorDeAngelo wrote:Victor if it's not a reaction test, your vote loses credibility if you have no discernible reasons for it.
But why the need to state it's a reaction test. I mean everyone went around labelling votes (reaction test) or (not reaction test) then it would be just silly.
Are you waiting for acryon to answer for you?
Did I miss a question or something?
Edit: Written before #66. And because I didn't really have anything to say on everything after 55, but I don't want to be unambiguous. Sometimes I respond to things people say, and then they post 10 more times before I submit.
Huh, I thought there was something specific about 55. You don't really need to specifically mention just to say I saw but I don't comment.
Why are you spending more time asking questions about these minute details instead of scumhunting, brother?
Questioning is scumhunting, and I have my methods.
In post 72, Not_Mafia wrote:In post 67, VictorDeAngelo wrote:EBWODP: Missed a bit
Why is it important to note the vote is not a test?
Why is important that you wrote your post before 55?
You don't think players should claim serious votes as such?
No, not really. If you want to give reasons, you give reasons.
What are you trying to achieve questioning that?
If someone does something that strikes me as unusual or off then I will question it. It helps get games moving.
In post 138, wgeurts wrote:In post 137, Newbie wrote:In post 131, wgeurts wrote:
You went after me by instantly voting using other peoples reasons being discussed at that very moment?
Riiiiggghhht.
Also why isn't it possible that what I'm saying is true? You're saying that I used it as a crutch, what makes you think it's fake?
In post 144, wgeurts wrote:Also, woohoo you quoted my posts. So what?
You used the same reasons being discussed at the time.
In post 103, Wisdom wrote:In post 89, wgeurts wrote:
You do realise sometimes people let stuff slip easier if they think they're safe?
Honestly the vote on you was based of little reasoning so the unvote was as well. I don't have any explicit reasoning fro doing so.
All for you newbie; the so hard to find discussion of the reasons you claimed to have created.
In post 265, Wisdom wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: wquerts
Yeah, I don't like this quick recovery. A moment earlier you were on the brink of suicide and now, after getting people to think you're a newbtown flailing and beg you to unvote yourself, you act like nothing happened. Conviniently, this all happens just as there's momentum on me building.
In post 303, FinnLaw wrote:
Wisdom- With Wisdom,I'm probably leaning slightly scum.I just disagree with some of the arguments he is making about Wgeurt and I do feel Wgeurt can't win in Wisdoms eyes over the self-vote situation. I do feel it's a catch 22, and I just don't think this is helpfully for town. (I understand Wisdom disagrees with the catch 22 but I do feel it's a catch 22.)
What is bugging me is thatI have Wisdom leaning slightly townand just confused with Wgeurt he could be scum but then I don't think the two of them would be arguing like this if they were scum buddies. So if any which one is it? Probably vote soon but not just yet, want to be more comfortable with my decision.
In post 312, Mathdino wrote:
Newbie, who would you want to lynch if not wgeurts/Wisdom? What are your thoughts on Silver?
In post 317, Wisdom wrote:
See above post. You're also looking at the surface and not beyond that. Being asked to do something does not mean that doing it is okay.
In post 319, Wisdom wrote:One of {SilverWolf, Newbie} is scum, both for this unwarranted WKing of wgeurts and for jumping on the easy wagon with rehashed reasoning. I don't think they both are, seeing as they voted together in a short time using the same reasoning.
In post 237, Newbie wrote:Posts #1 and #2 by Wisdom are weird because they came after wgeurts' voting/unvoting of him as well as theobvioussuspicious behavior that wgeurts was getting hounded for. I find it hard to believe that Wisdom didn't see why wgeurts' behavior was extremely scummy, especially with that odd unvote. Therefore, Wisdom's questions come off as fluff and as an act of trying to look town by asking questions.
There also hasn't been any real scum hunting from Wisdom, just a few comments here and there about certain players and questions towards certain players. It almost seems like Wisdom is skirting through this phase, asking just the right amount of questions in order to not set off any alarms.
I also think it's possible that Wisdom could've been trying to inch by inch put suspicion on VD with posts 1, 2, and 3.
Of course, if wgeurts flips scum, all of this will most likely become null.
In post 332, Wisdom wrote:
And the first thing he did after all this frustration was "okay, unvote as requested. Nothing's wrong, we're going back to scumhunting. x and y are scum, this is why."
Trust me, this is not how newbtowns deal with frustration. They have their pride to consider, they even think that they'll look more scummy if they back down now that they went this far. It's not making any sense for a newbtown to comeback so easily. I know you probably can't understand me because you lack experience with newbtowns, but I replace into newbies all the time and see such behaviors.
In post 332, Wisdom wrote:
Assume I am town for a second. How do you think your and SW's votes look, considering they consist of the same reasoning that has already been explained and also considering their timing?
I'm more leaning scum on SW than I am on you, but it's definitely one of you.
In post 386, Mathdino wrote:
Newbiewants to lynch Wisdom (Newbie, I'd really appreciate if you expanded on your other suspicions just in case the Wisdom wagon doesn't pull through)
I just realised that I completely forgot to include Newbie in my reads list. Everything on her ISO with the exception of the wagon hop to Wisdom seems townish, but what I don't get is how or why she got convinced so easily by someone she thought was scum a page prior. I could see how she might fall for the AtE self voting/unvoting stuff, but that doesn't negate everything did beforehand.
Newbie, sorry for the rampant questioning, but can you explain this more?
In post 386, Mathdino wrote:
On a sidenote, I forgot to say this earlier, but I'm not sure what I think of Newbie's overconfidence that Wisdom isn't town (saying she'll be a top suspect if he does). On the contrary; if Wisdom is lynched and actually flips scum, I'm turning to you for bussing the guy.
Slightly leaning town on Newbie, I don't think that's gonna change until we get at least a flip.
Actually, I remember having thoughts on interactive tells I forgot to post. Lemme see if I can remember those and I'll post a few thoughts in a sec.
In post 516, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:
I asked every player to elaborate their reads on the person they want lynched.
Why is Wisdom scummy to you?
In post 520, blindmewithscience wrote:[/b]
Summary of wisdom points: to me the case is mainly because of his criticism of wgeurts. Please correct me if wrong.
In post 551, wgeurts wrote:
The discussion was a few pages long and you didn't find my vote so scummy at first otherwise you would have pushed it and/or voted me.
In post 551, wgeurts wrote:
You did neither and decided to lurk, that isn't scummy in its self however one of your forst posts afterwords instantly used others reason right after discussion to jump on me. Then the same happens with your vote on wisdom, you lurked and then suddeneley you jump on wisdomUsing arguments others were alreay discussing.
In post 556, acryon wrote:
What is your reasoning for suspecting Wisdom outside of disliking his interaction with wguerts?
In post 237, Newbie wrote:Posts #1 and #2 by Wisdom are weird because they came after wgeurts' voting/unvoting of him as well as theobvioussuspicious behavior that wgeurts was getting hounded for. I find it hard to believe that Wisdom didn't see why wgeurts' behavior was extremely scummy, especially with that odd unvote. Therefore, Wisdom's questions come off as fluff and as an act of trying to look town by asking questions.
There also hasn't been any real scum hunting from Wisdom, just a few comments here and there about certain players and questions towards certain players. It almost seems like Wisdom is skirting through this phase, asking just the right amount of questions in order to not set off any alarms.
I also think it's possible that Wisdom could've been trying to inch by inch put suspicion on VD with posts 1, 2, and 3.
Of course, if wgeurts flips scum, all of this will most likely become null.
In post 651, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:snip
In post 741, Mathdino wrote:
This pinged me; I can't say I'm comfortable with this part of the post. This read seems much more IIOA and summary than any sort of analysis, and really comes across to me as fencesitting. At any point you can make a stance on SilverWolf and it'd still be consistent with this post. Do youhavea read on her, Newbie?
In post 741, Mathdino wrote:
Here's my other issue with your post, Newbie.You're on the fence with literally almost everyone in this game, it's mostly just "this is a good point, this is a not-so-good point" but I got nothing out of reading that, not even where you stand, which defeats the purpose of reads list. Furthermore I'm not even convinced by anything you've said since you don't have a stance to really argue for. There's MORE than enough information in this game to come up with something but I'm not even sure who you'd be for or against lynching, and we're nearing deadline fast.
In post 741, Mathdino wrote:
Here's another question, since you apparently liked the post where I asked something like this. Who are your top 2 candidates for lynching (outside of policy)? What other suspicions were you talking about here?
In post 741, Mathdino wrote:
Addendum because I don't feel like putting it above: I have a fleeting suspicion that Newbie went with this reads list because she felt compelled to in order to be active and provide thoughts, not because it really helps scumhunt. Reading through her ISO gives me a definite feel offencesittiness on anyone that she's not currently voting on.
Since we're nearing deadline I'm not going to push a Newbie lynch (and I still have to look over Victor) but I think this stuff should be kept in mind just in case. Very much beginning to rethink my read on her in light of Silver's meta and what people are reading off her AtE stuff.
Oh, yeah,FoS: her.
In post 896, Mathdino wrote:In post 704, Newbie wrote:SCtH: I have to find strength to really read through his posts. I'll do his later.
Newbie, can you do this maybe now? Ish? You've given no reasons for the wagons you're willing to be on; I mean at least we have arguments from TTH and Riddleton.
If Const flips scum, I'm going to be a lil suspish here.
In post 918, Malakittens wrote:Anyways:
VDA is scum.
Newbie just gave me hibbyjibbies.
Bmws/mathdino/tth/Finn/mm are all town.
Wisdom im unsure.
sctH is probably town.
Riddle gutscum.
I forgot the rest so yah >_>
In post 932, Mathdino wrote:
I think it's weird how I asked you to look over Constantine's posts and you decided to talk about Victor instead.
I looked at your ISO and you've had 0 thoughts on Constantine this game. Do you plan on following through with reading through his posts?
At this point I'm just gonna ask you to read/skim my case, haha.
In post 938, blindmewithscience wrote:Newbie, why didn't you post that observation regarding MAth's constantinte case and your comparison to Riddle's VDA case sometime earlier? Just curious why that observation/opinion wasn't relevant then.
In post 942, Mathdino wrote:Well you didn't post much after your reads list, except in defending yourself against my suspicions of said reads list. So nowhere, technically.
Occurs to me that the fact that of all game events occurring you only responded to direct questioning reads fairly defencive. You saying you'd be willing to lynch Victor/Riddleton was prompted by me. I'm not really sure what prompted the vote itself, but the way that page reads makes me think TTH convinced you to do it.
I just don't understand why you didn't vote him the moment I asked who you want to lynch.
In post 1016, Mathdino wrote:Do I detect a scumread on Malakittens or a tu quoque fallacy? Justify yourself, Newbie. Calling out hypocrisy is not a good response, as there are very very good reasons that Mala's town.