The MafiaScum Minecraft Thread - AllTheMods 9!!! - NEW Vanilla?

[Klazam]

the ender chests KNOWS

[Klazam]

*spooky noises*

not that i'd know what that would be like

[EspeciallyTheLies]

LOL klaz...

Ender trick not happening anyway lol.. everyone gets a fresh start together for 1.7.

[Osota]

Are we planning on switching to 1.7 for the modded server? When would we be switching?

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Are we planning on switching to 1.7 for the modded server? When would we be switching?

It wont be for a month or two at least. I've barely just started looking at 1.7 mods, let alone have a list even.

[Osota]

When we do could I get a backup of the 1.6.4 world? I've done a lot of building in there that I am proud of and I would love to be able to run through it in a solo instance.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

When we do could I get a backup of the 1.6.4 world? I've done a lot of building in there that I am proud of and I would love to be able to run through it in a solo instance.

absolutely i do try to get a link up on the blog to download the previous world when we reset.

[Osota]

If you want input, suggestions, or help for this 1.7.10 mod pack let me know.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

I do! post anything that really interests you or PM it to me or send me a link when you see me in IRC

I should probably just make a google doc for suggestions anyway. I'll do that.

[Klazam]

Glowstone wire seems cool, and m wont let me have it in High Seas lol

So thats one

[Guilty Gunsmith]

Gdoc for mod suggestions

yes i know it's ugly right now. i'll organize everything later

(this is also ETL btw...)

[Klazam]

May i make a suggestion?

Make a fourth column to gauge interest- just have "0" in that, people add one if interested/will use. That way you could hypothetically trim the fat off the modpack

[Guilty Gunsmith]

excellent idea klaz!

Edit: done

[Klazam]

Maybe even a -1 if a person is strongly opposed to the mod's presence- only if the person feels that mod will create a negative experience for that person

<.< mystcraft

[Guilty Gunsmith]

lol... well i'd rather they post in here if they absolutely will not play with a particular mod installed.

this doc is so i can look at ANY AND ALL suggestions that people would like. doesn't mean it will all go in. we can discuss that further after we get a list together.

[Klazam]

yeah bad suggestion lol

[Klazam]

went in, added a BUNCH of mods

[Maestro]

But what I'm saying is, say we put in an item like a fluiduct, which is item ID (xxxx). In the new TE, it's known as Entity:Fluiduct. Would it be able to distinguish between the old and the new? I was under the impression they completely redid the system, erasing Item ID's completely. Not just hiding them behind an alias.

TE is different; TE

did

completely re-do some things as far as I know, but I'm not sure if you already have a version post-rework of the Duct system. I forget when it happened but it was probably on their move to 1.7.

Anything as sweeping as the ID changes (there're player ID changes coming soon too! HYPE) can't just happen in a single version change, even if it's a major version change. The Item number IDs are still there, even in 1.7.x and 1.8.x. They'll be phased out pretty soon, and any mod made for Minecraft for either of those needs to have their blocks and items registered the new way to work, hence this warning which you can find all over the place in the ScumCraft 3.1 client startup logs:

Code: Select all

2014-10-21 00:21:18 [SEVERE] [ForgeModLoader] Found anonymous item of class forestry.farming.items.ItemFarmBlock with ID 1395 owned by mod Forestry, this item will NOT survive a 1.7 upgrade!

So, for example, right now Forestry "FarmBlocks" are probably the Multifarm blocks, and they have different metadata values for Hatches and Valves, etc. "1395" = "Forestry:ItemFarmBlock" in your Minecraft as well as mine, the move to 1.7 will just force the game to ignore the first part, and reference the block by its name ID at all times. Mods had to be rewritten to handle this, yes, but they are being rewritten in a way that just kindof wipes the old way aside. The warning in the client startup logs is just referencing what would happen if a mod author self-lobotomized themselves and thought they could still use number IDs to reference blocks and items in code in 1.7: the game would go "lolno".

[Maestro]

I'm honestly not sure what your question / issue is at this point, dav.

[fuzzybutternut]

Lol I don't have an issue with it, I'd just rather not do it and have an item corrupt a world that we haven't even begun to play in yet.
Finding a good spawn is hard man.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Lol I don't have an issue with it, I'd just rather not do it and have an item corrupt a world that we haven't even begun to play in yet.
Finding a good spawn is hard man.

i dunno why you thought we would do this anyway.. it's not like the world is corrupt and we have to save things. it's a totally new version of MC. we always clean reset for that.

[fuzzybutternut]

I know I was just sayin'.

[EspeciallyTheLies]

lol dav... a whole page or so for nothing

[fuzzybutternut]

That's a metaphor for my life!


.
.

.

D:

[sthar8]

Hmmm... I dunno if I wanna keep going on the projects if we're gonna reset soon...