Newbie 1561: Puppies! (Game Over)

paulw556 · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Wed Dec 10, 2014 6:25 am

Vote: Copper223

For commenting first :p

paulw556 · Post Post #19 (isolation #1) » Wed Dec 10, 2014 8:49 am

I wouldn't say "last to confirm" was particularly weak but more the "easy option" for a random vote!!

paulw556 · Post Post #24 (isolation #2) » Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:04 am

In post 22, copper223 wrote:Why do you consider that option in particular, assuming he chose it as a method to randomize and not because he believes it may be a scumtell, to be "the easy option"? For instance I picked the first name on the list.

To be honest I was just saying what I think, Personally my vote was also an "easy option" by voting you for being the first to comment in the game. But I suppose that is what the RVS is for.

paulw556 · Post Post #28 (isolation #3) » Wed Dec 10, 2014 10:12 am

In post 26, copper223 wrote:I agree ++--, so it looks to me like ++-- is thinker and Paul is a spontaneous player, reads on them should be developped according to these baselines.

It would appear you are a thinker also, maybe even an over thinker (not that that is a bad thing maybe I should replace the word over with meticulous?) I wouldn't say I'm spontaneous more I just say it as I see it but I suppose that would be for other people to decide!!!

paulw556 · Post Post #56 (isolation #4) » Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:28 am

In post 55, Cabd wrote:
In post 52, choof wrote:so who has access to quicktopics

What exactly did you post this line for, choof?

Playing dunm because he knows exactly who has access to it?? Could be a possibility for now it's enough for me to change my vote

VOTE: Choof

paulw556 · Post Post #114 (isolation #5) » Sun Dec 14, 2014 1:33 am

In post 109, toolenduso wrote:
Prodding paulw556.

Sorry for my absence I had internet issues. I will go back through the posts I've missed and post my thoughts later.

paulw556 · Post Post #155 (isolation #6) » Tue Dec 16, 2014 4:44 am

Hello it's long lost me!!!

Sorry again for my inactivity hopefully my internet problems are finished.

So as for the game I have a few reads on people but like Singer I think post read tables only helps mafia so they can try and guide us to who we may already have I slight distrust for. so to that end I will keep my reads to myself for the time being and I will remove mt RVS vote also.

UNVOTE: Choof

paulw556 · Post Post #156 (isolation #7) » Tue Dec 16, 2014 4:50 am

In post 29, copper223 wrote:What was your impression of Singer saying I had a strong start but might be trying to trap Cabd because I asked him for a fairly specific meta?

Sorry I never did answer this question so I will do it now.

My impression of that would be that she was impressed with how you started (take it as the compliment it looks to be intended as) as for you trying to trap Cabd I would say she was just fishing for a reaction so she can use it as a gauge for reading you later (no I don't think she was trying to scum read you just looking for a baseline from which to go from)