In post 549, Psyche wrote:not distinct enough
And of eliminating it without a replacement?
In post 549, Psyche wrote:not distinct enough
In post 548, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:The "Best Town" Award
Disclaimer: I haven't read through 22 pages so if this has already been discussed, please just point me to the specific page where discussion commenced.
I feel that overall, it doesn't make sense as an award category because unlike "Best scumteam," the individual performances of the players in the town matter very little. For instance someone could be having a below-average game and yet the town that they are in wins the award and everyone in it gets a scummy.
This causes:
Devaluation of the scummy: The scummy is a valuable award and a source of pride for the holder and the community. When you award it to a whole group of people without even considering their individual effort, it could lead to undeserving recipients receiving the award. The other recipients of other awards would be on the same level as the "Best Town" category for the purposes of Scummies Invitationals etc. This leads to a lowering of value of what having a scummy means and turns it from something to be earned to something that can be had purely due to the luck of the draw. Also, the choices this year for "Best Town" were very, very limited.
== Counterplan ==
I propose awarding an individual award for best performance in a town victory. This would be distinct from the Best Mafia Catcher award as the latter is a Body-of-Work award while my proposal involves someone who performed best in a town win. It essentially means we have a "Best town" category. And in the category, after the best town win has been selected, the judges then select one person who was most instrumental in the win to be given that award.
Thoughts?
In post 547, saulres wrote:Actually, whynot"Scummie Nominated" for the finalists? Maybe not a banner but an alternate/additional title?
In post 548, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:The "Best Town" Award
Disclaimer: I haven't read through 22 pages so if this has already been discussed, please just point me to the specific page where discussion commenced.
I feel that overall, it doesn't make sense as an award category because unlike "Best scumteam," the individual performances of the players in the town matter very little. For instance someone could be having a below-average game and yet the town that they are in wins the award and everyone in it gets a scummy.
This causes:
Devaluation of the scummy: The scummy is a valuable award and a source of pride for the holder and the community. When you award it to a whole group of people without even considering their individual effort, it could lead to undeserving recipients receiving the award. The other recipients of other awards would be on the same level as the "Best Town" category for the purposes of Scummies Invitationals etc. This leads to a lowering of value of what having a scummy means and turns it from something to be earned to something that can be had purely due to the luck of the draw. Also, the choices this year for "Best Town" were very, very limited.
== Counterplan ==
I propose awarding an individual award for best performance in a town victory. This would be distinct from the Best Mafia Catcher award as the latter is a Body-of-Work award while my proposal involves someone who performed best in a town win. It essentially means we have a "Best town" category. And in the category, after the best town win has been selected, the judges then select one person who was most instrumental in the win to be given that award.
Thoughts?
In post 559, Untrod Tripod wrote:In post 556, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:do we have an award for best played PR?
veto
In post 561, Untrod Tripod wrote:any PR that deserves an award for good play should have been on a winning town team
In post 556, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:do we have an award for best played PR?
In post 563, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:In post 561, Untrod Tripod wrote:any PR that deserves an award for good play should have been on a winning town team
This is kind of why I was thinking about it, because sometimes a single player is so outstanding for one game, even though they lost. Things like best mafia catcher are body of work awards but I often wish I could help recognize a person who played incredibly for that one game, despite the rest of the team, perhaps, derping about and losing. It's hardly ever up to a single player to carry a team, often not very feasible, and of course it is a team game but a lot of games don't go that way. You don't get to choose your teammates but you do get to choose how you play the role you're given.
In post 568, Untrod Tripod wrote:best player on a losing cause has been discussed before.
In post 572, xRECKONERx wrote:So we're creating an award specifically for losing when there are no awards specifically for winning?
It's redundant IMO.