In post 11, Kublai Khan wrote:What the hell is Skype?
Congrats on the promotion SK. I can think of no better Title Fairy (sorry Buttons, you were good, but...)
The trick is picking a good successor so you can take credit for their good work later.
In post 11, Kublai Khan wrote:What the hell is Skype?
Congrats on the promotion SK. I can think of no better Title Fairy (sorry Buttons, you were good, but...)
In post 186, Oversoul wrote:I only bring this up because I don't actually see the Title Fairy as active as SK supposedly says it should be. TBM and Oman were good in my opinion because it was more a bureaucratic process than an application for acceptance that it seems to be now. Sure they gave opinions on titles but I don't actually think they rejected many titles, the community did that for them. SK is taking on a more active role when in my opinion, this isn't about SK's preferences - it is about the community's. If you want to think about it in terms of percentages I think it's 85% us and 10% SK, 5% mith.
SK's primary job is to maintain the process, so that titles fit the criteria of the first post.
It isn't SK's job to reject titles outright. If it is, the whole selection process for title fairy is messed up. SK was not elected, he didn't even have to apply to the greater administrative team for this position. TBM saw a way out and took it. If there was an application where a person's preferences matter, their overall tastes in culture, humor, and art would need to be taken into account. That did not occur.
The community chooses the titles, the community discusses the titles, it's only fair that the community should be able to administer the
titles. SK's active role thus far removed the community aspect of the entire process. The community is the only reason this thread,
position, and issue exists.
So everyone should take a step back and realize what this whole Title Fairy thing is about. It's not subjecting personal taste of titles on us, it's trying to incorporate everyone's taste into a good title.
In post 192, xRECKONERx wrote:In post 188, Shadoweh wrote:I thought the entire point of having a Title Fairy instead of setting your own title was for the Fairy to make decisions about what titles were appropriate after nominations. It's literally SK's job to reject titles outright if he doesn't think they're appropriate.
In general, no title fairy has been hands on like this. The Title Fairy is a ceremonial position. They're there to enact the will of the community while stepping in only when absolutely appropriate. Outright rejecting titles that have community support with no room for discussion is not how a TF should act imo
In post 280, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 279, Psyche wrote:
YOU'REINCREDIBLY LAME
Becoming a fairy has changed me
In post 397, T S O wrote:if we execute skrew that'll show them we mean business
In post 459, Nexus wrote:rabble
In post 1576, CooLDoG wrote:In post 1560, vezokpiraka wrote:
Is CoolDog forever in the hall of fame because he has the title "wanker"?
yes
In post 2400, zoraster wrote:Sleepy has basically full power over this subforum. That includes banning people from the subforum for a period of time.