Open Game Queue (Players and Mods)

This forum contains signup threads for Mafia Games. Read about how our signups work here.
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #6  (isolation #0)  » Wed Jun 10, 2015 6:07 am

/in 602
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #11  (isolation #1)  » Wed Jun 10, 2015 8:15 am

In post 8, vettrock wrote:Question: The setup list has 2 mason, but the Roles then lists a recruited Mason. Is the second mason recruited? What is the recruiting mechanism? Its not clear in the wiki.

Two masons to begin with.

They get a chance to recruit a third.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2351  (isolation #2)  » Mon Mar 06, 2017 11:11 pm

/in 681
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2515  (isolation #3)  » Wed Apr 05, 2017 10:16 pm

/in 684
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
 
User avatar
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Pronoun: He

Post Post #2524  (isolation #4)  » Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:03 pm

/out 684
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).


[ + ]

Return to Queue