Mini 1698: MDCXCVIII [C'est fini!]
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 42, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:nevermind. i'm moving on as this is a dumb discussion
Then why start it to begin with?
Seems to me its being dropped because it doesn't make you look goof and not because it's a dumb discussion.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
Yeah I
Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.
VOTE: implosion- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 53, Kublai Khan wrote:
His vote was deliberately not random.
And that makes him scum because...?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 64, MarioManiac4 wrote:Yes, but 3 votes had already been placed on Implosion. I think he should have been trying to find another possible scum at that point.
Shouldn't we find one before we look for another? How do we do that without pushing and getting reactions?
We've barely had any posts from implosion. Let's put some pressure on him and get a better idea of whether he is scum before we start going hunting a partner.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
I'll say this often.
Why?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 79, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 73, Necessary Evil wrote:WoodyWoodpecker wrote:In post 70, Necessary Evil wrote:This idea that we need multiple suspects is awfully strange.
Hi, have you played mafia before?
Yes. Something the timing seems strange, especially since he is still voting for Implosion.
You seem to be unable to realise someone can have more than one scumread. In this setup, there is likely three mafia. I don't see why I can't suspect more than one person.
In post 60, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 51, dragonspawn wrote:In post 49, implosion wrote:Unvote
VOTE: GrayFoxxxx
I wanted to do this earlier but there was no one else voting him so it wasn't really worth it. Thank you, KK.
Yeah I
Dont like this. Town doesn't need cover for a vote.
VOTE: implosion
I don't paticularly like this vote from Dragonspawn. It seems rather oppurtunistic with a wagon on Implosion starting.
What makes you think dragonspawn's vote was opportunistic? He gave a fine reason for it, I think. Further, why are you voting Implosion when the first suspicion you have is towards dragonspawn?
In post 71, MarioManiac4 wrote:Is that RVS?
If not, then since when have we only had one suspect on D1?
We do not have to lynch every suspect.
I think we're better off focusing on one at a time. It creates more pressure and keeps the town from becoming splintered. However, I am not necessarily opposed to having multiple suspects at a time. What you specifically suggested seemed suspicious to me so I am investigating you.
If everyone agrees on one person, that's a bad sign, as that means mafia are content with the lynch.
We are better off with everyone grilling their scumread, like you are doing with me right now.[/quote]
Where I everyone agreeing with lynching anyone at this point?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 95, implosion wrote:I wasn't sheeping KK, I just didn't have enough of an inclination to vote for you before I saw that it would make a wagon. Obviously I could be lying about that if I'm scum but that would be a bit silly, no?
Don't like this either. Why do you need to wait for others to make a wagon? Town has no reason not to create the wagons on suspects even if no one else sees it yet.
Scum on the other hand doesn't want to rock the boat.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
Been looking over implosion some more and I just see more questions. He didn't want to "waste" his vote by voting for gray before he knew whether a wagon could start, but he didn't hesitate being the first vote on woody at the beginning or being the first vote on evil after giving this explanation. So why was voting first on gray a wasted vote but voting first on woody and evil perfectly alright?
I look this over and I see backtracking by someone who is caught making a mistake. It's a sign of a guilty conscience and bad reasoning.
If implosion flips scum we should definitely look closer at woody and Mario. Both have been resisting/defending the push on implosion. On top of that woody especially looks like a good buddy for implosion as scum because it explains why he wouldn't worry about the woody vote creating a wagon. He had no intention of it becoming a wagon.
Just some general thoughts right now.
I like boon so far. Reminds me of my best friend. I'd like to see more from pk.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
QIn post 202, Boonskiies wrote:we posted it at the exact same time. Like literally...check the time stamps. I see the PEdit thing, but I really didn't care enough to change anything.
Also, as I've posted, he won't even really read the thread. It really doesn't matter. He's super frustrating to be scum with, as you can check the private thread of the game we were scum together with.
So his buddies might toss him under a bus day 1?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 496, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:Lynching town reads is playing against your win condition imo.
I disagree that this is always true.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
Some people are like that though. They will swear that the sky is purple when you can both see it's blue. It's no a scum tell though imho
So far my impressions.
Like Khan, boon, shazam. Fa hasn't said a lot but he seems like his town self so I can put.him there right now.
Not terribly impressied with implosion. Also not impressed with woody but I'm leaning more to disliking his style then his alignment right now.
Not very impressed with mario/denominator slot but it's not like a hard core scum.
Pk was pinging me earlier but humankind of going back to null for me.
Everyone else is not giving me a strong impression.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 704, WoodyWoodpecker wrote:How was bulb in that game?
A bit more aggressive. He bussed his partner pretty well which is what ultimately threw me.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
[instagram][/instagram]In post 880, Boonskiies wrote:In post 879, Annarchy wrote:In post 868, pisskop wrote:why is bulba town?
you're going to hate this, but it's mostly meta. I have three notes of posts that I read Bulba town in, and my explanation for all three of them is simply "meta." look at any game bulba has played and you will notice that his actions here totally line up with his town actions
more specifically, comparing his scum game to his town game, there are very distinct differences. I've found that he gives genuine, confident reads as town, while as scum, he plays a little more defensive with little thought given to reads.
I believe 213 is an example of town-bulba. so is 255 where he gives reads on everyone. in particular his read on Stubbs looks genuine to me -as scum I think he would run with a scumread based on what he said there.
and then there are a bunch of little things that give me a gut townread on Bulba. little comments that he just wouldn't bother to make as scum.
is this an Anna scumslip?
Why would this be a scumslip?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 893, Kublai Khan wrote:Okay. I'm all caught up.
Town: WoodyWoodpecker, Boonskiies, GrayFoxxxx, Shazam
Weaktown: TheDominator37, implosion
Weakscum: Annarchy, Bulbazoor, spice1209
Scum: FA_Q2, pisskop, dragonspawn
The WoodyWoodpecker/Boonskiies slapfight is a town on town squabble. GrayFoxxxx towntold pretty hard in the first half of the game. Shazam gave a strong town-tell as well.
I was never big on the MarioManiac4 wagon (I understand the reasons, but they aren't as strong as they are made out to be). TheDominator37 has been fairly townish, though a little milquetoast.
implosion is in the weak town because of a weird vibe that keeps him from being a full town read. Mostly it's the repeated motif where he has to constantly point out "scum-Khan could do that" which is weird that I'm the only one that gets this treatment. I had to look up if we had any game history and we've only ever been in one game together and I was town. If he could give me the reasoning behind this specific treatment I'd appreciate it, otherwise it feels a little like a "smear/discredit the townie" tactic.
The Annarchy weakscum read comes mostly from Necessary Evil. Necessary Evil's posts were lackluster and his read reasonings were vague. Though it could just be unfocused town. Annarchy has a totally different style, which is great, but I don't agree with many of her conclusions, which is bad.
Bulbazoor is a wildcard at the moment. His weird cadence/formatting, the backtrack, the (possible?) responding to old posts.. I can't even tell if english is his first language.
spicer1209 is in the hole that StubbsKVM dug at the moment. StubbsKVM was a weak scumread. And spice1209 is a non-read. So, it's meh/scum.
pisskop could be scum? I dunno? Maybe? He doesn't seem to care to find scum or lynch them. He's the emo kid of this game. He just wants to be left alone.
FA_Q2's Post 724 is the scummiest post I've ever read. It's one thing to hate a 10 page squabble. But finding both participants individually scummy (where if one turns up town, the other must be scum) is ridiculous.
dragonspawn feels like textbook scum coasting. He's not leading any wagons. He's not pushing or making waves. Here's a quick experiment. Without looking at the votecount, someone tell me who dragonspawn is voting for and why.
Spoiler: answer
VOTE: dragonspawn
I've been pushing implosion from the beginning. Hard to argue I'm not pushing anyone. And then at the same time say I am.
Can you make a more Inconsistent argument?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 893, Kublai Khan wrote:Okay. I'm all caught up.
Town: WoodyWoodpecker, Boonskiies, GrayFoxxxx, Shazam
Weaktown: TheDominator37, implosion
Weakscum: Annarchy, Bulbazoor, spice1209
Scum: FA_Q2, pisskop, dragonspawn
The WoodyWoodpecker/Boonskiies slapfight is a town on town squabble. GrayFoxxxx towntold pretty hard in the first half of the game. Shazam gave a strong town-tell as well.
I was never big on the MarioManiac4 wagon (I understand the reasons, but they aren't as strong as they are made out to be). TheDominator37 has been fairly townish, though a little milquetoast.
implosion is in the weak town because of a weird vibe that keeps him from being a full town read. Mostly it's the repeated motif where he has to constantly point out "scum-Khan could do that" which is weird that I'm the only one that gets this treatment. I had to look up if we had any game history and we've only ever been in one game together and I was town. If he could give me the reasoning behind this specific treatment I'd appreciate it, otherwise it feels a little like a "smear/discredit the townie" tactic.
The Annarchy weakscum read comes mostly from Necessary Evil. Necessary Evil's posts were lackluster and his read reasonings were vague. Though it could just be unfocused town. Annarchy has a totally different style, which is great, but I don't agree with many of her conclusions, which is bad.
Bulbazoor is a wildcard at the moment. His weird cadence/formatting, the backtrack, the (possible?) responding to old posts.. I can't even tell if english is his first language.
spicer1209 is in the hole that StubbsKVM dug at the moment. StubbsKVM was a weak scumread. And spice1209 is a non-read. So, it's meh/scum.
pisskop could be scum? I dunno? Maybe? He doesn't seem to care to find scum or lynch them. He's the emo kid of this game. He just wants to be left alone.
FA_Q2's Post 724 is the scummiest post I've ever read. It's one thing to hate a 10 page squabble. But finding both participants individually scummy (where if one turns up town, the other must be scum) is ridiculous.
dragonspawn feels like textbook scum coasting. He's not leading any wagons. He's not pushing or making waves. Here's a quick experiment. Without looking at the votecount, someone tell me who dragonspawn is voting for and why.
Spoiler: answer
VOTE: dragonspawn
In post 895, pisskop wrote:DS isnt scum, and even if he was he's not lynchable. Your vote is noted and useless there.
I'm actually surprised there haven't been more pushes for me being scum. And I don't see how anyone is unlynchable on day 1.
But I appreciate the vote of confidence- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
I was unaware that I needed to repeat myself over and over again to be heard. See I rather prefer to make an argument once than repeat myself to death. He hasn't gotten any better. None of you have made any arguments that are more convincing to me. I'm not obligated to hunt scum the way you want me to. I will hunt as I choose
I'm not going to compromise on an FA lynch. I really do think its a weak case. If I was going to jump on one of the larger wagons now it will probably be bulb. I find him more questionable.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 916, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 914, dragonspawn wrote:I was unaware that I needed to repeat myself over and over again to be heard. See I rather prefer to make an argument once than repeat myself to death. He hasn't gotten any better. None of you have made any arguments that are more convincing to me. I'm not obligated to hunt scum the way you want me to. I will hunt as I choose.
You've not made an argument once.
You voted implosion because he explained (or to use your words--"covered") his vote. He explained why he did it in depth.
Six posts later you says that we all need to put pressure on him.
Post 143 shows you re-visiting implosion, ask a rhetorical question, and state your view that he's got a guilty conscience over voting GrayFoxxxx(?). implosion answers your question and explains himself quite well to everyone's satisfaction except you.
3 days later, you're not "impressed" with him and he's your top scumread.
5 days later, you're telling him that you don't care what he thinks.
I mean, it sounds like you've got a super ace in the hole. You're so convince that implosion is scum that you are not willing to consider anything else. That is an unheard of level of certainty on Day 1. And with all that certainty, you make a piss-poor case and are content to wait for people to comb through your iso to find it.
In post 913, Boonskiies wrote:Khan, can we settle for FA today? Dragon, you should hop on too.
I'll hop if this goes nowhere. But I want to call bullshit on people townreading dragonspawn. If dragonspawn had said something like "yeah, I'm not totally into the game, let me change that" then that could be town. But his attitude isn't town. He's going with the flow and pretending to have an opinion on things.
Why would I need to pretend to have an opinion on things when I've been sharing my actual opinion quite frequently?
Why would I say I didn't have an opinion if it's a lie? I don't like lying. Even as scum I try to be as honest as possible. I'm not going to lie and say I have no opinion on matters in clearly giving an opinion on simply for you to townread me.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 932, Bulbazoor wrote:Your read of ke being scum is wrong. I was attempting to scumhunt with my vote on fA and you know it.
Who is ke?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 926, TheDominator37 wrote:Ok we have 4 Days left and we need someone to lynch
I'm not a big fan of the fa wagon so VOTE: bulb[/b]
Reread that and I was thinking, we have four days, why do we need to rush behind someone now because of that?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 1063, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Also don't ignore his posts about bulb.
I think if there was a busser on bulbs wagon it is Piss
What do you mean a busser on bulb? Bulb flipped town. How can anyone bus a townie?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 1063, GrayFoxxxx wrote:Also don't ignore his posts about bulb.
I think if there was a busser on bulbs wagon it is Piss
Question
Since we had two kills last night is it possible that we have two scum teams?- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
Looking over bulbs posts.
He voted for shazam and fa most. They are both dead now
The only other vote I saw was for Mario. Which stuck out more for the weird statements he made to Dom in 1029 and 1030.
Is he implicating Dom to mislead us here? I tend to think he might be, but I'm not sure because I have seen him bus his partners. I need to look.up at where he fell on the Mario wagon. If it was earlier I'm more inclined to think he is setting Dom up. Later, then it may be that the vote was a bus and that his closing statements to Dom were him trying to make us think Dom wasn't one of his partners.
Ill check a few more things tonight.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
In post 1044, Kublai Khan wrote:Naw, I think Boonskiies is scummy with that vote on me. I'm low hanging fruit.
Bulbazoor was trying to end the day early by self-hammering. Scum with day talk don't vote a competing wagon when one of them is trying hard to give up.
This is kind of bothering me. Why would you have been low hanging fruit? Barely anyone was seriously pushing you.
Interesting to note that you were pushing pk for a bit and bulb said to lynch pk today.
This is a good place to start today
VOTE: kk- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
Not close enough. I saw watcher and for some reasoned missed the mafia part so I reached a bad conclusion.
And it should be obvious why I voted, unvoted, and revoted bulb.
1) we were approaching the deadline.
2) he was flailing around making questionable statements.
3) the counter wagon was fa who I was firmly town reading while bulb, even at best day 1, was null and toward the end of the day was getting worse.
4) I unvoted to consider his claim
5) I revoted when he slipped.
I don't know anything questionable about that.- dragonspawn
-
dragonspawn Mafia Scum
- dragonspawn
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3558
- Joined: May 10, 2014
Because I know fa fairly well. I may not be able to read him perfectly but I was feeling confident that this was his town game and the extent of the arguments against him revolved around his inability to be as active as some people wanted him to be. And looking back it may have also been from scum pushing the wagon as a counter to bulb. - dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn
- dragonspawn