Mini 1732 - Super Smash Bros. Project M(afia) - D7!
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 35, LicketyQuickety wrote:Wow, this game has bad form. No one talking about my "every VT should cliam" claim? For shame!
Vote: Licketywhy should everyone do that? is there strategic value or something?- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 45, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 41, smiffle wrote:In post 35, LicketyQuickety wrote:Wow, this game has bad form. No one talking about my "every VT should cliam" claim? For shame!
Vote: Licketywhy should everyone do that? is there strategic value or something?
No, its a bad play. Interesting that you comment on it so after the fact.
VOTE: smiffle
im confused, you vote me for voting you for suggesting something that no one should do but you did anyway?- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 50, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 46, Xtoxm wrote:In post 35, LicketyQuickety wrote:Wow, this game has bad form. No one talking about my "every VT should cliam" claim? For shame!
On this topic, does anyone have a triforce? This a highly important question.
i don't have one, but I can give one to someone.
that means you aren't vanilla- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 87, Tails wrote:Actually your vote is quite good. Saw vc.
if its not bad, then whats good about it?
should i know the answer to this question myself?- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 82, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 79, smiffle wrote:if Dav is town, then why is my vote shit? riddle me this
I like my vote currently.
but why?- smiffle
-
smiffle
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 99, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 96, smiffle wrote:In post 82, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 79, smiffle wrote:if Dav is town, then why is my vote shit? riddle me this
I like my vote currently.
but why?
Because it created a BW on me that at least one scum is on.
i don't know about that...
hey, everyone vote lickety so he can find scum more easily, lol- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 102, Davsto wrote:In post 97, Metal Sonic wrote:Is that manzelda???
Okay I read this as Mandela for a second and now I'm just thinking "Nelson Manzelda" and giggling like an idiot
I need sleep I'm actually going now
Nelson Mandela 4 smash confirmed- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 106, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 104, smiffle wrote:In post 99, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 96, smiffle wrote:In post 82, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 79, smiffle wrote:if Dav is town, then why is my vote shit? riddle me this
I like my vote currently.
but why?
Because it created a BW on me that at least one scum is on.
i don't know about that...
hey, everyone vote lickety so he can find scum more easily, lol
What if I'm jester or something?
considering whats led up to this, id say thats a crock of shit, and you're just toying with the idea because you're scum- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 110, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Pretty early to be sure, wouldn't you say?
BTW how the heck would you know I'm scum with no meta on me based on the way I have played so far?
pretty early to spout bs too, oh wait, its never too early for that
meta sucks. try playing au natural with no dumb outside influence.
i only use it if im absolutely conflicted over something, or i need to confirm something someone else has claimed about an individual- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 115, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 113, smiffle wrote:In post 110, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Pretty early to be sure, wouldn't you say?
BTW how the heck would you know I'm scum with no meta on me based on the way I have played so far?
pretty early to spout bs too, oh wait, its never too early for that
meta sucks. try playing au natural with no dumb outside influence.
i only use it if im absolutely conflicted over something, or i need to confirm something someone else has claimed about an individual
Good so this is either an alt or you have played on another site. glad you have some experience.
what is up with the stupid bait question?
are you trying to gain an edge or something? or is it just to see "lets see how much i can trick this dumbass, hehehe, baiting iz kewl"
and thats the second instance of dumb baiting you've tried pull so far, and its only page four.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
wait, it gets better
says the guy baiting shit left and right- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
Read somewhere that proof-reading your posts would make people take you more seriously.
In post 170, Davsto wrote:I thought that MS' "BTOOM" thing was a dayvig of sorts. Was wondering how Ascetic relates to the % mechanic, since according to OP there are no standard kills.
I'm pretty sure it's super straight forward. Percentage hits, but nothing else does.
Come on Dav, you have to know how an ascetic works.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 176, LicketyQuickety wrote:And where is smiffle exactly?
what do people think of day chat for Scum here?
I'm here for you. Come to papa my little scum.
No, but seriously, what is this:
Lickety, why are your reads kind of jank? Dav's meh, Mario's voting me, but I kinda got a thing for his claim, and Ms is dicking around with his mini wagon on anyone tails votes for, but he's barely pushed anything unlike tails. Idk about Gl. I should probably close reads his posts more closely.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 245, Davsto wrote:But idk because usually it's "all actions hit except kills" but it's unclear if the whole % thing is classed as kills or not
anywho
let's move on
Pretty sure it said percent leads to death, but w/e
Moving on to you, Dav, who're your top three scum reads atm.
Mine are Lickety, who I'll cover more in depth later.
You
And possibly MS, but who knows about him. My mind is hazy.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 177, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 175, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 174, MarioManiac4 wrote:People who target me get no result or their action fails
Pedit: You really don't
But I do have a guess.
Cool!
Wouldn't even mind you revealing your guess. After all, NoNormalKills.
Scum could have daychat. Also could not
Useless spec is useless.
And just to be clear, your role is "3-shot ascetic with a twist?"- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 188, All Alone wrote:
In post 45, LicketyQuickety wrote:
No, its a bad play. Interesting that you comment on it so after the fact.
In post 105, LicketyQuickety wrote:ofc I'm trolling. Why do you ask?
In post 106, LicketyQuickety wrote:What if I'm jester or something?
In post 110, LicketyQuickety wrote:Pretty early to be sure, wouldn't you say?
BTW how the heck would you know I'm scum with no meta on me based on the way I have played so far?
In post 135, LicketyQuickety wrote:Stop saying I'm obvtown unless you don't care if I get NKed early.
In post 182, LicketyQuickety wrote:You can't be serious with this. I'f I am not playing a game solvey playstyle I don't know what is! I'm actually trying to play as obtown as possible.
That last quote is pretty clearly contradictory with the others, but IMO it reads like Lickety's trying to get noticed contradicting himself. If we lynch him and he's a jester, would that end the game? If so, I'd rather that people with percentage abilities pseudo-vig him.
Either way though, I'd rather lynch this today:
In post 95, Davsto wrote:
'cause you saw an opportunity to vote and you grabbed it. It doesn't look like you genuinely found it scummy. You didn't prod or poke or ask questions about it before voting, you just voted.smiffle wrote:if Dav is town, then why is my vote shit? riddle me this
I don't buy this. Davsto has been around long enough that I'm pretty sure he's seen townies vote without asking questions. It reads like he's trying to capitalize on smiffle for not following the hypothetical Big Book of Rules For Good Little Townies. Combine that with the fact that Davsto didn't prod or poke smiffle before voting him (or even during or after, for that matter!) and I really have a hard time thinking that this is something Davsto honestly believes.
VOTE: Davsto
Someone's town af.
What does lickety have to gain by contradicting himself other than trying to get himself lynched? Are you implying that any votes on him are bad choices as well?
Lol @ the Dav vote, I kinda like it, but it's probably based off more than early votes atm.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 197, vonflare wrote:when someone who has % gains % they die.
So if someone is hit twice, they die.
Good to know.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 252, LicketyQuickety wrote:Looks like professor Homeboy is finally playing. Or is the ease off from pressure feeling pretty good right now?
Yeah, I do feel pretty good. There is no pressure on me btw, just some shitty votes.
How does the imminent pressure on your slot feel?
I'm assuming pretty bad. Speaking of assuming, wth was up with the immediate assumption Dav was a killing role after he mentioned kills?
The leaps and bounds in your logic are... lets just say "hard to follow"
p-edit at lickety, when did I promise a case? I'm just here to ask you some insightful questions, and go over some of the things you said, pal.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 190, LicketyQuickety wrote:I read my ISO. I am actually really scummy right now. I have reasons, but I don't think people are picking up on them?
You are one funny guy Lickety.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 250, Davsto wrote:well you (obviously) but Lickety is rubbing me the wrong way too and I think you're both scum but I really don't see you both being scum.
Don't currently have a third. Will have no time to stuff tomorrow morning so expect some more in a longer while.
"Hmmm, they're both scummy, but their both trying to put one another on the guillotine, so idk."
Please, don't discredit your own reads any further. Just tell it like it is.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 207, GuiltyLion wrote:Lickety 204 - takes Ascetic role claim at its word
Lickety 206 - accuses Davsto for accepting Ascetic role claim at its word
This is another glaring contradiction from Lickety in addition to the ones you guys have caught. I'm inclined to believe he's intentionally planting them at this point. Definitely agree that he should be vigged/%'d, and I have a townread on All Alone for approaching it with that mindset.
Tails and Metal Sonic votes on him are bad but I don't thinkbothare scum.
Is one more scummy than the other? (please say Sonic)
Gl, specifically, what about Davsto do you like or not like atm. He's pretty ambivalent with his reads...- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 215, Davsto wrote:I wanna say that LQ is scum but honestly I still prefer whatsisname I'm voting (sue me) and I still think there's a chance that LQ is just dim, to put it politely. He seems genuine in believing I should be able to summon more about that ascetic.
Hey, considering that All Alone pointed out the terrible reason you voted me to begin with, why are you still on my wagon?- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 216, Gendaberry wrote:In post 208, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Oh yeah, and one part of my role is miller. On top of the usual guilty investigations thing, it seems like I'll show up as having visited a random person who died each night.
Sleepwalker is a role I haven't heard of in a long time. Miller-sleepwalker sounds pretty believable actually, although it's an odd combo.
In post 219, Tails wrote:Why Lickety is scum and you should vote him:
1.) He's hedging his bets. (MS or GL? Seriously? You couldn't just say you had 4 scumreads? You had to limit the amount you had? Seems fake.)
2.) He's fishing and only focused on roles and mechanics. No scumhunting from him whatsoever. This is metagaming at its finest. It's filler.
3.) He's spreading suspicion everywhere and keeping his options open. Look at the last 2 pages and see how many people he's called suspect.
Now lynch the obv. scum.
For me, 1st reason translates into: he just has plain bad reads.
2nd reason is actually quite valid, he's so far planted his vote on me, and hasn't done shit except say how bad my reasons for voting him are, and try to bait anything that's everything. He keeps doing a ton of useless spec too. Trying to outguess the mod or w/e. I have strong bias on meta gaming people, so that's the nullish part of the reason.
3rd reason sounds like you think he's opportunistic, but that's basically your first reason. Point out to me multiple instances of him being opportunistic than maybe that'll support what you're saying.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 269, Davsto wrote:In post 263, smiffle wrote:In post 215, Davsto wrote:I wanna say that LQ is scum but honestly I still prefer whatsisname I'm voting (sue me) and I still think there's a chance that LQ is just dim, to put it politely. He seems genuine in believing I should be able to summon more about that ascetic.
Hey, considering that All Alone pointed out the terrible reason you voted me to begin with, why are you still on my wagon?
I tend to trust myself more than I trust others whose alignments I am unaware of. Not because I think I'm "better", but because I know my reads come from a town perspective. I have no idea on All Alone's motives.
So you're defending your reason for voting me on the first or second page of the game? There's pretty much nothing redeeming about it at all.
Don't push that town perspective bs on me. I didn't ask you to trust All alone and unvote, I only want to know why your still voting me in this instance of time and space.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 275, Xtoxm wrote:It's also that I know he's capable of better than this so him starting awkwardly like he has is concerning.
So it's one part meta, one part gut, and one part he's been popping into the thread to say some stuff then leaving?- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 262, LicketyQuickety wrote:1.) Want to know a secret? In my first 16 games I was lynched day 1 8 times.
Why drop the self meta? No one cares.
Are you trying to say you're just inherently scummy, thus implying I should unvote you for being so? That's the worst defense I've ever heard.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 279, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 277, smiffle wrote:In post 269, Davsto wrote:In post 263, smiffle wrote:In post 215, Davsto wrote:I wanna say that LQ is scum but honestly I still prefer whatsisname I'm voting (sue me) and I still think there's a chance that LQ is just dim, to put it politely. He seems genuine in believing I should be able to summon more about that ascetic.
Hey, considering that All Alone pointed out the terrible reason you voted me to begin with, why are you still on my wagon?
I tend to trust myself more than I trust others whose alignments I am unaware of. Not because I think I'm "better", but because I know my reads come from a town perspective. I have no idea on All Alone's motives.
So you're defending your reason for voting me on the first or second page of the game? There's pretty much nothing redeeming about it at all.
Don't push that town perspective bs on me. I didn't ask you to trust All alone and unvote, I only want to know why your still voting me in this instance of time and space.
Probably because you didn't exactly have a strong start.
Pot
meets
Kettle.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 282, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 271, LicketyQuickety wrote:I want a single read by the time the (real) day is over. I'ts 5pm now.
I already said All Alone is a townread. Liking Mario as town too. If you want weak scumleans, I'm thinking at least one of Davsto, Metal Sonic, or Tails is scum, but I'm not gonna advocate to lynch any of them yet. I prefer watching and evaluating early wagons rather than being on them.
IMO it's a lot easier for scum to dress up a bunch of bs on someone and "sort" them as town or scum. I get that fence-sitting and not expressing oneself makes you less transparent, but I refuse to give strong reads when I don't fully believe in them. People will keep scumreading me for it in the early game, I'll use that assess whether their intentions are honest or not, and I'll prove them wrong as the game goes on.
Alright, alright, I kind of like these reads...
I want more, so much more from All Alone.
For that second paragraph, you're basically saying: instead of doing some good ol scumhunting, I'm going to watch this one from afar for the meantime while you guys juke it out and look scummy for it in the process?
It's not early game anymore. We've come pretty far, but w/e... your reads are pretty good, but I expect you to get your head in the game.
What do you think about this Xtomx?- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 285, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 280, smiffle wrote:In post 262, LicketyQuickety wrote:1.) Want to know a secret? In my first 16 games I was lynched day 1 8 times.
Why drop the self meta? No one cares.
Are you trying to say you're just inherently scummy, thus implying I should unvote you for being so? That's the worst defense I've ever heard.
Well apparently you missed the freaking huge-gigantic-over-the-top banner I flew so high they would see it from a half mile, but if you want to interpret that as me saying, "I'm always scum therefore I'm always Town" go right ahead.
So you're really saying you just want to bite the bullet and get lynched because you don't care?
The real flaw is in your strategy, my friend.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 292, Xtoxm wrote:In post 278, smiffle wrote:In post 275, Xtoxm wrote:It's also that I know he's capable of better than this so him starting awkwardly like he has is concerning.
So it's one part meta, one part gut, and one part he's been popping into the thread to say some stuff then leaving?
That's not really it.
Yes part meta, he's made a few bad posts, and it's the best i've seen so far to go on. This ultimately more of a 'do stuff' push, but if stuff doesn't transpire i'm going to assume this is his scumgame.
I'm not loving what Tails is doing, i'm not townreading Sonic but other than that i'm basically town reading/leaning the significant posters thus far.
P-edit: smiffle, #282 is probably Lions best post of the game so far, no problems with that one.
Wait, so Xtom, you want him to do more, but he defends himself saying that doing less is how he usually plays, but you're fine with this?
And by saying you have no problems with his post, does that mean you agree with a majority of the reads on it?- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 340, Metal Sonic wrote:not the most immature either, fortunately
/off topic, but I will pay money to the person who searches night and day for the most immature thing Ms has ever said.
(actually, I'm broke. No money, just brownie points.)- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
hehehe
(psst tails, what's your read on All Alone?)
(don't tell anyone, but I actually read all alone as town.)
(psst tails, I just iso'd you, you should step outside the lickety, mario box and interact with other players as well)
(psst tails, so far the only town read I've seen in your iso is me, and that's not very reassuring)
(psst tails, you've barely acknowledged your partner in crime, Ms, even though they've sheeped every single vote you've made in the entire game)- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
So, Asp needs to get shot by the vig real soon.
Seems like GL defaulted to a pretty poor vote on Davsto,
In post 390, GuiltyLion wrote:
Eh, I missed that triforce bit from Davsto the first time around. I remember his vote being poor but I just reread his ISO and overall it's not as bad as I thought it was gonna be. But he still hasn't done much scumhunting and I want to see what happens to the gamestate when I put my vote here.
Wtf is this? An experiment? "Let's all vote Dav and see what happens, hur dur." This isn't AP chemistry. Plus now you just sound really uncertain of your vote. The vote that you appeared to put down because you wanted to see what would happen if you put a naked vote in the thread on page 17. What did you want to see happen? What were you even expecting?
Half of this reason is moot now:
In post 408, GuiltyLion wrote:Reasoning for my davsto vote is simply that he's voting for a townread and that another townread is voting him.
Other than the fact that this is a really weak reason, it's now half a weak reason, which isn't even a reason at all. That just makes it sheeping at this point.
On a side note, in 387, it sounds like you're trying to read lickety as town, but then you threw a giant fence on those reasons and proceeded to sit on it:
In post 393, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't see it as town, I just don't see it as particularly scum either. If we all played like you and Tails right now, we'd run up a wagon on 'obvscum' LQ, then if/when he flipped town (which is likely given sheer probability), we'd be left with virtually no significant information.
That last part is also untrue, as practically everyone in the game has already made substantial interactions with Lickety, or they've given an actual read on him, except for maybe you.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
Lickety's wagon has four votes on it right now, (I'm pretty certain), despite that, it kind of lost some steam ever since Lickety decided to lay off a bit. I don't know what to think about his, "hey guys, I'm going to try and save myself by painting myself as town." approach. It could be for either right or wrong reasons. However, I do get some bad vibes off his unvote, that was probably performed due to pressure. I really wish I could be voting both Lickety and GL at the moment.- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 355, Tails wrote:I don't like the sudden movement of some players to throw doubt on the Alive townread or to scumread ALL the players on Lickity. Alive is the towniest person in the game besides me. As for the Lickity wagon scumreads, that's the only thing that makes me think Lickity might be town.
I saw Liskety's recent stance on all alone and it reminded me of this. Lick's stance is for the wrong reason, but I was going to mention how Dav's recent unvote and vote on GL has made him seem a little more townish. Alone's vote on Dav is pretty much old news for an even older reason anyway. I'd say Alone is only a tad town at this point.
I like how you responded to my quiet message, I think you might've doubled your post count in recent pages, and the posts are decent too.
I sense the slightest distancing from this post towards a person who's been nothing but devoted to you for the majority of the game:
In post 381, Tails wrote:Sonic, I wouldn't worry about me if I were you. I have this handled.
There's not really anything to conclude from it, just that your relationship with Sonic is looking a bit one-way.
(like it's always been, hehehe)- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 424, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 421, smiffle wrote:An experiment? "Let's all vote Dav and see what happens, hur dur." This isn't AP chemistry. Plus now you just sound really uncertain of your vote. The vote that you appeared to put down because you wanted to see what would happen if you put a naked vote in the thread on page 17. What did you want to see happen? What were you even expecting?
Yeah, it is an experiment. I didn't ask for anyone else to vote him. I am uncertain of my vote, and I will happily admit this!
I wanted to see Davsto's reaction ("your vote on me is bad, therefore I will vote you"), as well as the reactions of others. You've correctly identified it was a naked and weak vote. Does that make me scum?
You still haven't answered my question. What was the point of your vote on Davsto? Did you really just want him to OMGUS vote you? Why would you go headfirst into a situation like that just to see what happens? Does his vote on you affirm your scum read on him? It's not making sense to me.
There's ulterior motive written all over that vote, and it rubs me in the worst way possible.
In post 424, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 421, smiffle wrote:That last part is also untrue, as practically everyone in the game has already made substantial interactions with Lickety, or they've given an actual read on him, except for maybe you.
Show me where Klick, ASP, Wanderer, Gendaberry have made "substantial interactions" with Lickety. Theoretically that can be an entire scumteam just lurking this out on the sides while town rips itself up in the process. And then you have some players like Xtomx who just throw out a townread on LQ but that's it, as well as players like MM who claimed LQ was a townread but then decided to vote him for no logical reason a few pages later.
I'm just annoyed that somehow LQ, who is a player who has proven himself consistently hard to read correctly and has been mislynched on D1 many times, is becoming the main focus of the game so far. I'd rather poke around and figure how to read the other players before we go driving up a lynch on one that I haven't sorted yet.
To be perfectly honest, I unconsciously put the inactives/lurkers in the vig-kill pile, except for maybe Genda. Once some of them get replaced, (which will probably happen soon), and they've started to actually play, then will you have a clear read on lickety? Time will tell. I can explain the Lickety votes to you right now: I've never played a game with Lickety before, and, since meta is terrible, looking up his meta would be an enormous waste of time. I can tell you this: he's scummy in this game right now, and that's all that matters.
p-edit: speak of the devil- smiffle
-
smiffle Goon
- smiffle
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 190
- Joined: October 12, 2015
In post 425, Wanderer-nl wrote:I just read everyone's iso because I had a hard time remembering which posts went with which players reading it all in game-context.
I have a townread on smiffle and I don't know why people are scumreading him (btw smiffle, you don't have a vote out atm)
I'm not really sure what to think about LQ and GL. I'm troubled by GL's defending of LQ in his 387, even though GL isn't saying LQ is town, he also isn't saying he is scum, but it still is a fairly defensive post overall regarding LQ and that doesn't work with his prior attitude towards him (which was rather critical, as if he was scumreading LQ)
LQ looks scummy to me, but I don't think the 2 are scum together (I believe I read this somewhere already as well, don't remember who said it, Davsto?) Is it possible we're in a multiball?
Wanderer, check yourself before you wreck yourself, my first vote's been pinned on Lickety this whole time.
Now that you mention it, multiball might be entirely possible. It's still much too early to say. - smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle
- smiffle