The War to End All Freaktowns: GAME OVER


Locked
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #15 (isolation #0) » Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:12 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Flameaxe wrote:To bandwagon BM...or not to bandwagon BM....that is the question...
One hour, twenty-two minutes go by, and you're ready to move your vote? Is that what I'm seeing, John Kerry?

Vote: Flameaxe
. Acting like past runners-up in presidential elections is anti-town.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #17 (isolation #1) » Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:39 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Heh, heh. Well played.

But seriously, you look like you've been eating quite a bit there. I know
I
couldn't eat that much.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #35 (isolation #2) » Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:46 am

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Battle Mage wrote:
Vote: Flameaxe
Flameaxe Wagon, FTW?
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #85 (isolation #3) » Wed Sep 05, 2007 3:43 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Trend-setting is anti-Town.

Confirm Vote: Flameaxe
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #130 (isolation #4) » Fri Sep 07, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Mastermind of Sin wrote:So, does anyone have any theory on how the items work, or is it posted somewhere and I'm just being lazy? I mean, I know that you can pick up, drop, or keep items, and then you can use them, but is there anything else?
rajrhcpfreak wrote:6. Alcohol plus three items on their list gives them Mayor Status in the thread (extra vote).
As for the current game at hand, I'm not impressed with Kscope's vote on SoupFly, and his responses.
Unvote, Vote: Kscope
.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #188 (isolation #5) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 12:19 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

I'm all right with an item claim.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #240 (isolation #6) » Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:02 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

It certainly does sound like that. My vote's fine where it is, then.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #257 (isolation #7) » Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:19 am

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

It's funny, you made such a big deal about not claiming your items that, now that you have... I don't feel like unvoting you.

Pick another person.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #279 (isolation #8) » Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:16 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Obviously I'm thick as stone. I'm looking for where it says "KScope's lying." or something similar, and just not seeing it. Not that I'm unvoting anytime soon. I'll be back when it's my turn to claim.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #349 (isolation #9) » Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:10 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

I did not give an item to anybody.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #452 (isolation #10) » Mon Sep 17, 2007 3:52 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

So that people don't go chasing ghosts I will state, for the record, I am holding the Survivor DVD. However, I also need it, so, despite my love of freedom, I will be forced to hang on to it myself.

And, LAL is awesome. The problem being, we can't really prove he was lying, even if he died.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #478 (isolation #11) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:35 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

The Survivor DVD is the only thing I'm currently carrying.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #480 (isolation #12) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:03 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

I did not, and I did not.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #541 (isolation #13) » Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:00 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

I think not claiming items goals is good for two reasons. The first reason would be something you referenced above: it might completely stop any and all item trading. This is something that might come back to bite any of us in the ass (though really, when thought about, I don't think we're gonna be looking for items that don't further our goals
anyway
...)

The second is that I don't want the Mafia knowing if they and I are competing for the same items. Item goal claiming gives the Mafia a reason to off us, and then expect our items to be on the ground to snatch up the very next morning. Hell, I wasn't totally keen on the item claim, but it seemed to have a purpose in outing scum, so... yes.

In response to the IH attack... I
think
I see the slip, and if I'm seeing it right, it's not lynch-worthy. Can we take IH's advice and explicitly state the slip? If we're looking at the same slip, I don't see how that can hurt. And if you guys say the slip you're looking at needs to not be mentioned, I'll accept you're looking at something different and vote him. But for now, I think he's good.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #553 (isolation #14) » Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:50 am

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Dude, MoS was saying that item claiming was going to catch scum. Catching scum > my desire to keep my items secret. I intend to speak up at the beginning of things that I disagree with - hence me voicing my opinions about item goal claiming.

So... yeah, I don't think the slip is that big.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #642 (isolation #15) » Thu Sep 27, 2007 3:26 am

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

I should find out what happened with my items? As far as I know, I have the Survivor DVD... I suppose I'll ask again, though.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #706 (isolation #16) » Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:23 am

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Sorry for the absence. Something came up.

I have confirmed that I am currently holding naught and only a Survivor DVD. I sent in the pick-up on Mon Sep 03, 2007, 10:37 pm PST.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #731 (isolation #17) » Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:58 am

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Claiming the item gives away my shop, and I'd rather not do that at this point in time.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #741 (isolation #18) » Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:49 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

I am currently holding but a single item. I have had other item(s) in the past, but I do not have them anymore, because I used them.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #790 (isolation #19) » Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:18 pm

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

Explanation of what? I've explained. Claiming the other item would be a shop giveaway.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Kilroy8675309
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Kilroy8675309
Goon
Goon
Posts: 377
Joined: August 28, 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon

Post Post #797 (isolation #20) » Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:46 am

Post by Kilroy8675309 »

I... never pushed for an item claim. Thanks for trying, though. I just went along with it.
If children cause accidents in the backseat, and accidents in the backseat cause children, which came first?

"My point is, make people explain themselves." --RafK
Locked

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”