In post 96, CuddlyCaucasian wrote:While people not talking probably played a part, the fact that a fourth of the players in this game decided to willingly sacrifice their ability to have any power in the game is something that has hopefully proven here why no one should ever do that so early in the game with nothing else on their resume in future versions of this. Also, it being a full-scale anonymous Survivor game would probably contribute to people actually putting effort into winning.
This game did showcase a lot of potential for interesting strategy though, and I think it will end up being far more interesting next time.
essentially my thoughts
i think for starters people had too many votes, which kinda tends to overwhelm. in a game of 24p (assuming anon survivor), i would say maybe 36-40 is the most you should have.
i also think its worth considering having one vote every round, and then x votes to distribute over those rounds, instead of just having a lump sum. makes the whole std thing a bit redundant since lmao you're no goat now
i think as well this being a test run contributed to people not playing as hard as they could have (i know i definitely phoned it in), so hopefully w/ anon survivor that changes? also the rhythms of survivor would change this mechanic a lot i feel like, what with immunity and rewards
