In post 19, Diego1487 wrote:VOTE: lillith
For not realizing that I misspelled the name before I pointed it out.
yes
In post 78, Not_Mafia wrote:
In post 25, Diego1487 wrote: In post 23, Apricity wrote:VOTE: Diego
I don't get the point of his reaction test, nor why he picked itle in particular.
Random's entry post also confuses me.
He placed a vote and gave what looked like a reason for the vote in the same post. I wanted to know if the reason was sarcasm, and therefore RSV, or an actual reason that I was going to analyze.
In post 28, Diego1487 wrote: In post 27, Apricity wrote: In post 25, Diego1487 wrote:He placed a vote and gave what looked like a reason for the vote in the same post. I wanted to know if the reason was sarcasm, and therefore RSV, or an actual reason that I was going to analyze.
It was literally the 3rd post of the game. Did you really expect him to have a serious reason?
No that was why I would have had an issue with it had he said it was serious.
VOTE: Diego1487
to easy
apricity safing lillith2013 yes no what
notmafia use asalt to diego1487
weak vote fire mafia
weak vote town
weak vote town
In post 72, lilith2013 wrote:
Fire has no way of scumreading me. If the hydra were voting me seriously this early, it would probably come from Vedith because I have played with him before. Also, from what I know, Fire and Vedith have similar playstyles (e.g, unserious/trolling). Therefore, I doubt Fire's vote on me was serious or had any reasonable basis. --> trolling
It had nothing to do with him not sharing reasons.
fear yes
In post 94, lilith2013 wrote:
In my view, trolling = not serious. Not necessarily a bad thing. I do think you both are not always serious and use a lot of sarcasm, which is trolling to me. In terms of being able to scumread me, I seriously doubt Fire would be able to say right off the bat, while I was obviously RVSing, whether I was scum. Because we haven't played together before.
fear
In post 102, lilith2013 wrote:I believe I've read through one or two of his games, which gave me a general idea of how he behaves and his posting style. As I only have one finished game onsite, I doubt anyone would know enough about me to know my playstyle.
What kind of play would lead you to form a legitimate reason to vote someone you'd never played with before?
fire has no way of scumreading me
in terms of being able to scumread me i seriously doubt fire would be able to say right off the bat whether i was scum
dont think ive played with fire before
because we haven't played together before
what play lead you form legitimate reason vote someone you never played with before
ever played before
repeat you fear yes
In post 23, Apricity wrote:VOTE: Diego
I don't get the point of his reaction test, nor why he picked itle in particular.
Random's entry post also confuses me.
randomidget react notmafia react lillith2013
not itlepip
diego1487 question to itlepip
what react
In post 23, Apricity wrote:VOTE: Diego
I don't get the point of his reaction test, nor why he picked itle in particular.
Random's entry post also confuses me.
what what you what
confuses me
yes