Nomic

[JDGA]

Oh, we're trying Nomic again?
Sure, why not. /in

[JDGA]

Aye 2, Aye 3, Nay 4

pls don't encourage spamposting

[JDGA]

Nay 5, Aye 6, Aye 8

Rule Proposal #7:

Rule breaches can be assessed a fine in terms of "penalty units". One penalty unit is defined as 25 dollars subtracted from the cash counter.

Rule Proposal #9:

Rule proposals must be in numeric order. Should a player number a proposal out of order, they will be assessed a fine of two penalty units.

Rule Proposal #10:

Every player must vote on every proposal within 48 hours of the proposal's creation. Should a player fail to do so, they will be assessed a fine of one penalty unit.

Aye 7, 9, and 10

[JDGA]

Aye to 11

[JDGA]

Nay 12, 13

I don't think we want to enforce a 24/7 presence on anyone

[JDGA]

Have you ever played Nomic before? This entire

game

is all about the letter of the law. Everyone fools around and does whatever for a while, then someone finds some crazy series of loopholes to give themselves an instant win and everyone debates for a week over whether or not what they did is legal
And no, we're not happy, you doubled up on number 14.
VOTE: Nay Feli's 14 - need a definition on ownership first, and not having the recipient's consent will probably break things
VOTE: Yay Drench's 14
VOTE: Nay 15 - the votes don't reset?

[JDGA]

VOTE: Nay 16 - Good idea, but that wording is super weird (with no specified end other than someone receiving a "plurality", wouldn't the first vote technically decide it?)

[JDGA]

I'd support it if it set a specific end time at which point plurality is checked

[JDGA]

Public meaning the players or anyone on MS who wants to vote? Regardless, good enough for me.
VOTE: Aye to revised 17

[JDGA]

Might be best if one of us just makes a new thread and we reset. (possibly with a more comprehensive set of starter rules)

[JDGA]

New thread is up here. I couldn't really help myself from making a more comprehensive initial ruleset, but it ought to work well enough~