Blitz 26: Maintaining Law, Order... (Game Over)

Titus · Post Post #15 (isolation #0) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 1:37 pm

VOTE: Lucky

Yeah, I am not laughing.

V/LA today.

Titus · Post Post #36 (isolation #1) » Fri Feb 05, 2016 9:15 pm

In post 29, Almost50 wrote:In my mind; the best play scheme I could come up with is to pick 5 players to target, and each to be targeted by 2 of us. This way we know if only one died that it was not the PGO thing. If both die then the target is confirmed scum.

In other words, I think this will force scum not to load their guns on N1, so we will only lose one town player for the NK, but it gives us 2 confirmed townies through both of our PRs.

Any remarks are welcome (and strongly recommended)

Plothole, this makes blocking the scumkill unlikely and scum would likely just pick off the real PRs if they were a threat. If you're concerned about people knowing, crumb it. Discussions on this point just divert from scumhunting?

Titus · Post Post #58 (isolation #2) » Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:50 am

VOTE: Almost50

No lynch D1? You can fry.

Titus · Post Post #89 (isolation #3) » Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:03 am

In post 88, lane0168 wrote:
In post 15, Titus wrote:VOTE: Lucky

Yeah, I am not laughing.

V/LA today.

In post 58, Titus wrote:VOTE: Almost50

No lynch D1? You can fry.

Why so serious?

And did you read his post? Or were you just skimming looking for something to call scummy and latch on? It was pretty obvious that a no lynch is best play in the game plan he was suggesting...

The game plan that he was suggesting as an option... And you want to lunch him for it? That's silly. And scummy

I did. Any plan that requires no lynching is probably scum motivatived. I can't see how a townie could think that we should forgo scumhunting on day 1.

Titus · Post Post #104 (isolation #4) » Sat Feb 06, 2016 5:26 pm

In post 101, Ranger wrote:
Dwlee wrote:Explain.
Titus recently explained her scum game as being, "talk about the optimal town strategy and watch as the town doesn't do it, then complain". That is what I saw from her.

pignash is posting similarly to how he traditionally has when scum.

Almost50 is probably too low on that list, but is town enough.

And Persivul...well, he's just always scum.

Huh?

All I have said about strategy is don't discuss it. And I moved my vote to Mr. we should no lynch.

Where's logical Ranger?

Titus · Post Post #108 (isolation #5) » Sat Feb 06, 2016 5:50 pm

Pignash, what do you think of almost?

Titus · Post Post #110 (isolation #6) » Sat Feb 06, 2016 6:11 pm

Maybe a lil pressure to help sort him? Whatever it is, I want to figure it out. I think almost is scum, you think it needs sorting. Win win?

Titus · Post Post #131 (isolation #7) » Sun Feb 07, 2016 4:57 am

OK, why are we still setup speccing?

Why is it difficult to wagon Mr. Let's NL, Self-Vote, and then OMGUS? Almost isn't scumhunting. He's trying to have predict able night actions for scum.

Titus · Post Post #167 (isolation #8) » Mon Feb 08, 2016 4:45 am

Almost50 is at L minus 2 and I pick up two naked votes while I was asleep. Sounds right. Sounds really townie. I expect that one o Ranger or Dwelee is Almost's partner.

Titus · Post Post #171 (isolation #9) » Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:02 am

Ranger hasn't done anything other than be a random name generator like ika tried to do in Inorganic. Maybe it's the cold but your read that Ranger = obvtown is just no.

Persivul, why no Almost vote. His progression is terrible?

I will be in and out because of cold but I am here and trying.

Titus · Post Post #188 (isolation #10) » Mon Feb 08, 2016 7:46 am

l minus 1 so I am claiming. Cop here.

Titus · Post Post #189 (isolation #11) » Mon Feb 08, 2016 7:51 am

P.s. Dwelee, scum always RVS me trying to do shit before I get impressive.

Titus · Post Post #192 (isolation #12) » Mon Feb 08, 2016 7:56 am

Gg, sorry buddy. You deserved better.

At least you got the cop to NK now. Hehehe.