I am catching up now and sorry for my part about the mess, I had too many beers. If you believe that I should take the blame I am ready to take it and will try to be helpful with my last day then.
I got grilled on my read list and want to improve using your feedback, let me know if this is better. I want to be better at this game, so any feedback is useful for a new player.
Frozen Angel leaning town
Claimed to be Peach and cannot be lynched. She is either town or trying to not be the center of attention.
It would make only sense to me to do the second only if you are really threatened.
So I believe that she has more chances to be town than scum.
What I didn't like is the fact that you were encouraging us to consider Amihan's mod claim:
151
155
159
then you dismissed him as causing troubles in
190
FA, also, I believe that you were trying to get a reaction out of me, but maybe next time you can spend a bit more time reading my posts when the answer to your question is just two posts below.
FA, even though I believe that you are town, you tend to post alot. And alot of it is not really content, you often post two times in row or more
link.
Don't know about others, but this makes the information harder to read, if you collated everything in a single post that you previewed before to send, I would find it alot easier to read.
Just my own opinion: feel free to disregard.
I note that you believe that Amihan didn't push the vote against the mod by accident
385): you believe that he has an ulterior motive and possibly backed down when he was about to be lynched. But didn't RC said that nothing will happen by lynching him
link. So can we drop it and stop wasting any more time now ?
Aristophanes town
Ari tried to stop the Ami thing on D1
70
In general I believe Ari tries to sort out the game: he asks people to explain themselves and decide only afterwards.
For example he did this for
Ranger
FB sees this as fence sitting
. I disagree, he puts the vote when needed.
Ranger leaning scum
I read Jackal's ISO as leaning scum. I already said that I read this post
45 as an indication that he does not want a no lynch rather than interpreting it as face value. However what I didn't like, is the fact that he didn't reply to people who mentioned this post as being scummy. It could be that he really didn't have time as he left afterwards but that could be seen as scummy as well.
I read Ranger's ISO as leaning townish. She caught up and she is posting content now
547. I want to see more content before to be sure about this slot. I didn't like the fact that she didn't participate at the end of the day although I did the same ...
For example in
85, he says that he wanted to try to lynch RC because the worst could be a no lynch. In my opinion, he obviously did not want a no lynch, it was his way to say, I know something ... follow me. That's at least how I read it.
Flubbernugget leaning townish
I like the fact that he posts mostly about the game and tries to bring information to the table rather than fluff.
177
I didn't like the vote against FA without a reason
406
Amihan leaning scum
I really believe that he made his mistake genuinely: this post does not seem to me to be a lie
102.
Also, he looks like he is trying to sort the game in the second half of D1.
link.
445
Of course if you were some posts at face value, you would deduce that he is scum, but I don't think you should read every post at face value ...
I am leaning scum on him now because he is defending himself by wanting to limit the focus to a group where he is not.
In post 536, Amihan wrote:I think we should limit our focuses today to people who were voting the Mason up to L-1. Not because that's scummy, but because it'll result in a lower chance of wagoning another Mason in case scum can't tell already who they are.
I see this as an attempt to deflect.
---
I didn't finish to go again through every ISO, but because there is so much content maybe it is better that I go with the flow ?