In post 669, A Real Scourge wrote:(arguably, Turtles' double vote is, but it's not nightkillable)
Why isn't Turtles nkable?
In post 669, A Real Scourge wrote:(arguably, Turtles' double vote is, but it's not nightkillable)
In post 664, A Real Scourge wrote:In post 660, Radical Rat wrote:Thank you, Mr. Mafia
UNVOTE:
I still don't like Soren, but that's the first solid post from Not_Mafia all game.
i really disagree, but i've already explained why. i'm surprised you're fine with that, and aren't wondering why Not_Mafia's "first solid post" was made to defend Soren of all people.
In post 676, Radical Rat wrote:In post 664, A Real Scourge wrote:In post 660, Radical Rat wrote:
I didn't say I agreed with him. I've already made my position quite clear. Anti-Town is Anti-Town.
However, I AM happy to see Not_Mafia actually playing the game. That's what that post was about.
In post 679, Tails wrote:Okie. Your logic still sucks.
In post 682, Radical Rat wrote:I don't know about that.
A double voter means scum could be lynched faster. It also means Town could be lynched faster, but I'd say it ultimately depends on if scum feels confident in their ability to direct that dual vote.
My guess is that as soon as Turtles gets a scum lynched, or close to it, they'll die that night.
In post 673, A Real Scourge wrote:Radical Rat?
In post 684, Radical Rat wrote:Doesn't giving scum a double voter seem kind of.... Unbalanced?
In post 680, A Real Scourge wrote:
do you have a strong case for Kain being scum? because he's super mislynchable honestly and i cannot figure out how to read him when all his weird behaviour is just how he plays all the time.
In post 689, Tails wrote:
A super quick wagon builds up based on super easily pushable BS. The wagon is easy for scum to push, and given that it built up really quickly, chances are they did. Everyone is forgetting that Barn had ample opportunity to claim but didn't. They're instead focusing on Soren's hammer, which is bad, but not scum indicative. Soren's response to you also is not scum indicative. In fact, it points in the opposite direction. Scum would be pandering to you, not telling you to go screw yourself. There's just no benefit to scum Soren for any of these moves.
In post 680, A Real Scourge wrote:
do you have a strong case for Kain being scum? because he's super mislynchable honestly and i cannot figure out how to read him when all his weird behaviour is just how he plays all the time.
I have a few things that I think point in that direction. Is it super strong? No. But it's stronger than the Soren case.
In post 692, Tails wrote:To be fair, Scourge, I really expected more from you when dealing with the Soren situation. Your handling of it seems lazy.
In post 695, Tails wrote:However, if you want a suspicious vote on the Soren wagon, look at Sonic.