Mini 1766: SCP Foundation Mafia (GAME OVER)

Davsto · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 8:15 pm

VC 2.2

Klingoncelt (4): Elsa and Anna, shos, Raskolnikov, beeboy

(L-1)

Elsa and Anna (2): Dream Man, Klingoncelt
shos (1): MarioManiac4

Not Voting (2): A Real Scourge, Extrapolated Eagle

With 9 alive, it is 5 to lynch. Deadline in (expired on 2016-03-21 08:30:00).

shos · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:32 pm

Now loo at that

Klingy freaking out

So easy

shos · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Mon Mar 07, 2016 9:34 pm

And that omgus

Lol

...eagle, can you vouch for me-town?

Dream Man · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:27 am

In post 695, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 289, shos wrote:
PAGE WUN

Oh hey! E&A again! fuck! <3

um, so, I don't have a clue about this setup's flavor, but it sure sounds like it's going to be hard on scum to make a good fakeclaim
anyone familiar with this?

also if that mason claim is real I'ma cut my dick off

This is ten thousand red flags.
He looks at the flavour and he thinks about fakeclaiming? Nah. I don't like that sht.

Interesting.

To answer the question, shos, this setup's flavor is very easy for scum to create a fakeclaim for.

Dream Man · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:33 am

In post 725, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 721, shos wrote:Wheeee everyone wagon hopping on me
That actually didnt happen in a long while

Tge three kills make me wonder if this could be multiball? Snarky js indeed most likely a vig kill, no sane scum would waste bullets there.

EAs heavy crumbing and implies a killing role, and mario, you really cant blame me for thinking it is a vig. But, considering the snarky death, this might be a scum crosskill.

Snarky was 99.9% a vig kill. [1] E+A has a point. The scum wincon isnt really friendly to anything but a single scum faction. Until massclaim I'm going to trust E+A's non-vig killing role claim.

[1]- Snarky, it's very likely a vig killed you and that's because you don't lie as town unless you don't think anything can go majorly wrong? To a vigilante, you were the perfect kill, because if you were scum, then you would die. If you were town, nothing would happen.

I do not believe that this deduction is quite right. As much as I do not believe that there are two vigilantes in the game, there are many possibilities that may have inflicted the three deaths, for example, Snarky being a self-destructing Treestump: note how his Role PM has not been revealed yet. There is also a possibility that Elsa and Anna also contain a form of Paranoid-Gun-Owner-isque invulnerability, which explains why she was rather insistent for beeboy and Snarky to visit her.

Dream Man · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:40 am

In post 735, Klingoncelt wrote:Raskolnikov and Beeboy have proven to be Scum as well, by virtue of their naked votes.

Hello Klingoncelt. I see your points with regard to Elsa and Anna, and your allegations that they are lying.

Would you like to discuss how Raskolnikov and Beeboy are scum? I certainly do not see them both being scum with kelbris, given how they had voted for him yesterday.

beeboy's 620:

In post 620, beeboy wrote:VOTE: Kelbris

sure

Raskol's 637:

In post 637, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: kelbris
sorry guys kind of busy today

Do naked votes necessarily mean that someone is scum? Kelbris made this vote yesterday, and it does not look very naked:

In post 636, kelbris wrote:Sorry about being AFK, things have been a bit hectic for me the past few days. With deadline running so close, I am inclined to join the Dream Man wagon, surprisingly, his name is fitting since there is an SCP called the Dream Man, who knows? Maybe the SCP will match the name, lol.

VOTE: Dream Man

Looking forward to hearing you from you soon,
Dream Man

Dream Man · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:45 am

VOTE: MarioManiac4

I have not agreed with anything they have posted so far.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:05 am

Oh good. All I wanted to do was play YCBA all over again. /s

At least E&A listened to me on kelbris.

I so want to say that the wagon on Klingon is terribad just based on how quickly the wagon formed, but she's doing everything she did in YCBA as scum.

@Klingon what's different here?

In post 777, shos wrote:And that omgus

Lol

...eagle, can you vouch for me-town?

I think so. In what way?

Woof?

In post 781, Dream Man wrote:VOTE: MarioManiac4

I have not agreed with anything they have posted so far.

Let me read over him again because I think I remember something similar and I might need to gouge my eyeballs out post game for saying this but I don't think I want to lynch Klingon right now.

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:09 am

Ok. I can go with this for just a bit.

VOTE: MarioManiac

@Mario explain your shos scum read.

beeboy · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:38 am

Nah EE trust the Klingon wagon is good, if you think Klingnis scum why do you think me and E&A would bus 2 buddies in a row?

beeboy · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:41 am

Speed doesn't mean a wagon is wrong.

Elsa and Anna · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:45 am

In post 782, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:I so want to say that the wagon on Klingon is terribad just based on how quickly the wagon formed, but she's doing everything she did in YCBA as scum.

and Saga

its just like a mirror

~Elsa

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:49 am

In post 784, beeboy wrote:Nah EE trust the Klingon wagon is good, if you think Klingnis scum why do you think me and E&A would bus 2 buddies in a row?

?
Explain why you think you and e&a are scum real quick for me, I'm confused

In post 785, beeboy wrote:Speed doesn't mean a wagon is wrong.

It can be a good indication of it, however. Regardless my vote on Klingon is a lynch and I'm not a fan of short days. :/

beeboy · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:00 am

i want to see klingon claim o.o

shos · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 5:08 am

Woof.

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 5:32 am

In post 781, Dream Man wrote:VOTE: MarioManiac4

I have not agreed
with anything they have posted so far.

you're kidding right
"hmm... i dont agree with this guy.
HE MUST BE SCUM LOLOLOLOLOL"

MarioManiac4 · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 5:33 am

In post 783, Extrapolated Eagle wrote:Ok. I can go with this for just a bit.

VOTE: MarioManiac

@Mario
explain your shos scum read.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:12 am

In post 784, beeboy wrote:Nah EE trust the Klingon wagon is good, if you think Klingnis scum why do you think me and E&A would bus 2 buddies in a row?

Don't forget me bro, I want in on this bloc.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:22 am

In post 779, Dream Man wrote:
In post 725, MarioManiac4 wrote:
In post 721, shos wrote:Wheeee everyone wagon hopping on me
That actually didnt happen in a long while

Tge three kills make me wonder if this could be multiball? Snarky js indeed most likely a vig kill, no sane scum would waste bullets there.

EAs heavy crumbing and implies a killing role, and mario, you really cant blame me for thinking it is a vig. But, considering the snarky death, this might be a scum crosskill.

Snarky was 99.9% a vig kill. [1] E+A has a point. The scum wincon isnt really friendly to anything but a single scum faction. Until massclaim I'm going to trust E+A's non-vig killing role claim.

[1]- Snarky, it's very likely a vig killed you and that's because you don't lie as town unless you don't think anything can go majorly wrong? To a vigilante, you were the perfect kill, because if you were scum, then you would die. If you were town, nothing would happen.

I do not believe that this deduction is quite right. As much as I do not believe that there are two vigilantes in the game, there are many possibilities that may have inflicted the three deaths, for example, Snarky being a self-destructing Treestump: note how his Role PM has not been revealed yet. There is also a possibility that Elsa and Anna also contain a form of Paranoid-Gun-Owner-isque invulnerability, which explains why she was rather insistent for beeboy and Snarky to visit her.

Why would you out that?

Raskolnikov · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:28 am

Woah, with that it's safe to assume that kelbris visited E+A last night with a non-kill target and died as a result, and the real mafia killer visited Alchemist.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:29 am

As opposed to kelbris killng alch and being killed by E+A in a type of vig shot.

shos · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:43 am

Would you idiots stop discussing E&A's killing mechanism.

shos · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:43 am

(no offense but you're town and you're only helping scum)

Extrapolated Eagle · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 1:36 pm

In post 789, shos wrote:Woof.

Cool. I think I got you then.

Does it work two ways?

Klingoncelt · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:33 pm

In post 776, shos wrote:Now loo at that

Klingy freaking out

So easy

Actually I'm not freaking out. I haven't been this calm since they took 'ludes off the market.

Funny how E&A wanted Kelbris lynched so much that they had a vote on you - which they then moved to AristoCow.

No, dear, it's not me freaking out. It's the hydra that painted themselves into a corner.

It begs the question, why are you defending them?