Mini 1796 | May 13th - Game over (Tomato Mafia wins)

Creature · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 7:51 am

Who said daylight isn't dangerous too?

Tommy is V/LA until Monday 30th

VC 1.6

Votecount 1.6

[1] Tommy - Raskolnikov
[2] Raskolnikov - Lowell, JarJarDrinks
[0] drmyshottyizsik
[0] Lowell
[1] Dunnstral - Trivium
[2] Zachstralkita - inspectorscout, drmyshottyizsik
[0] nnn_thekushmountains
[0] Blue Yoshi
[1] Transcend - Blue Yoshi
[1] JarJarDrinks - Transcend
[1] Trivium - Dunnstral
[0] inspectorscout
[0] Bacde

[0] Nolynch

Not voting (4): Tommy, nnn_thekushmountains, Bacde, Zachstralkita

With 13 alive, 7 votes is the majority.

Deadline: (expired on 2016-06-10 16:30:00)

Dunnstral · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:03 am

In post 244, Zachstralkita wrote:if i had to go with a vote id say raskol, drmy or scout

No, needs more info, and no

Seriously that is a bad list

Dunnstral · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:04 am

Also WHAT WAS THAT from tommy

Like it wasn't even a vote was that intentional

What does he mean we're SOCK PUPPETS that won't play to our win condition?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:08 am

In post 249, inspectorscout wrote:Zach, yes, you have a reason to hate my reads, mainly because they arent worth anything yet. Yes, i do post a lot, but that is because i want to mobilise the other townies, only little real discussion has happened so far. Does that mean im scum? I dont see the reasoning behind that tbh.
You seem to be the only one loving triv's posts, but not going to get into that because im neutral to them. drmy is nullscum to me, btw. He still didnt reply to my question about that vote on you
Thank you for your reads, im glad you kept ur meming to the bare minimum this time

I wasn't even sure you were speaking English in that post, what is your question

Dunnstral · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:09 am

In post 237, Zachstralkita wrote:UNVOTE: Dunnstral

hes prob town again this time

Yeah that's what I thought

In post 222, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: Tommy
Ideally I'd still vote zach but most people don't seem interested. Leaving this till I get back sunday afternoon.

Raskol whyyyy

In post 240, Blue Yoshi wrote:Crazy things happen when you don't pay attention.

I don't treat Dunn's "town leadership" position as I've come to recognize it as a towny indicator and I can't tell if all these leads they're chasing {Raskol, Zach, Trivium} are actual intents to scumhunt, as the Dunn/Zach interaction that caused this thread to be more cluttered and annoying to sort through didn't lead anywhere for either person.
The Trivium wagon seems good, kinda bothered by how fast Dunn switched but seeing how easily it is to pinpoint the scumminess in Triv's posts it's understandable.

Troll play is hard to read sometimes but Zach's looks rather town, seeing as he didn't jump too hard on his own defense when Dunn started pressuring him.

I see Raskol's early posts as mostly town so I don't know where people got their scumreads from, but I tend to miss obvious things unless they're explained to me in detail so someone can get on that for me thanks <3
(not that it'll matter since their more recent posts seem even more towny)

Transcend is actually looking poor to me, their heaviest posts are unrelated to the content of the game (#200-201) and trying to be generally uncooperative, and nothing that they've done so far has given town vibes at all.

In post 241, Blue Yoshi wrote:VOTE: Transcend

I'm pretty sure that Triv is the most likely to get lynched today but this is better

Do you not have any thoughts on what happened with the Raskol wagon?

And how are you "pretty sure" triv will be lynched when I'm literally the only one voting them

That's some confidence I guess

inspectorscout · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:40 am

In post 243, inspectorscout wrote: Wat drmy why is saying 'i hate those posts' scummy? The 'if x then y' is rather a scum thing to do because its just giving 'info' that everyone already knows = fillers, so why vote for him based on just that? He is right about those posts being annoying

Im pretty sure the first line was a question.

drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 249, inspectorscout wrote:Zach, yes, you have a reason to hate my reads, mainly because they arent worth anything yet. Yes, i do post a lot, but that is because i want to mobilise the other townies, only little real discussion has happened so far. Does that mean im scum? I dont see the reasoning behind that tbh.
You seem to be the only one loving triv's posts, but not going to get into that because im neutral to them. drmy is nullscum to me, btw. He still didnt reply to my question about that vote on you
Thank you for your reads, im glad you kept ur meming to the bare minimum this time
I wasn't even sure you were speaking English in that post, what is your question

Yes, that was english. If something is unclear, ask me.

Dunnstral · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:44 am

In post 242, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 130, Zachstralkita wrote:that wasnt a scum claim btw i just hate those if ur x then y posts
why did you feel the need to even point that out? I think this may be a scum claim.
VOTE: Zach

By the way I don't really agree with this

Not sure what to make of you jumping from Raskol to Zach as you seem to be on popular wagons only and haven't given much of an opinion

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:44 am

In post 255, inspectorscout wrote:
In post 243, inspectorscout wrote: Wat drmy why is saying 'i hate those posts' scummy? The 'if x then y' is rather a scum thing to do because its just giving 'info' that everyone already knows = fillers, so why vote for him based on just that? He is right about those posts being annoying
Im pretty sure the first line was a question.
drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 249, inspectorscout wrote:Zach, yes, you have a reason to hate my reads, mainly because they arent worth anything yet. Yes, i do post a lot, but that is because i want to mobilise the other townies, only little real discussion has happened so far. Does that mean im scum? I dont see the reasoning behind that tbh.
You seem to be the only one loving triv's posts, but not going to get into that because im neutral to them. drmy is nullscum to me, btw. He still didnt reply to my question about that vote on you
Thank you for your reads, im glad you kept ur meming to the bare minimum this time
I wasn't even sure you were speaking English in that post, what is your question
Yes, that was english. If something is unclear, ask me.

I'll ask a second time, what is your question?

Blue Yoshi · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:51 am

Dunnstral wrote:Do you not have any thoughts on what happened with the Raskol wagon?

And how are you "pretty sure" triv will be lynched when I'm literally the only one voting them

That's some confidence I guess

I've seen how these things tend to go. Triv will come back, say some more incomprehensible things in their next few posts, get scumread a whole bunch, and then get lynched.

also the wagon didn't seem to generate very much information besides drmy's incredibly opportunistic hop on.

inspectorscout · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:54 am

In post 242, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 130, Zachstralkita wrote:that wasnt a scum claim btw i just hate those if ur x then y posts
why did you feel the need to even point that out? I think this may be a scum claim.
VOTE: Zach

Why is this a scum claim? 'If ur x then y' posts ARE annoying and they ARE scummy since they express a fact, rather than an opinion - oh, that is convenient, scum hates giving opinions because they have a harder time finding valid reasons to accuse someone of being scum. Posts like that are fillers, empty posts that have words in them but dont bring progress. Then my question is: why is saying that so scummy?

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:56 am

In post 259, inspectorscout wrote:
In post 242, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 130, Zachstralkita wrote:that wasnt a scum claim btw i just hate those if ur x then y posts
why did you feel the need to even point that out? I think this may be a scum claim.
VOTE: Zach
Why is this a scum claim? 'If ur x then y' posts ARE annoying and they ARE scummy since they express a fact, rather than an opinion - oh, that is convenient, scum hates giving opinions because they have a harder time finding valid reasons to accuse someone of being scum. Posts like that are fillers, empty posts that have words in them but dont bring progress. Then my question is: why is saying that so scummy?

It is very scummy to point out that something wasn't a scum claim. Town wouldn't even think to post that! Paranoid scum post that.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:58 am

Dunnstral wrote:
In post 244, Zachstralkita wrote:if i had to go with a vote id say raskol, drmy or scout
No, needs more info, and no

Seriously that is a bad list

What made you assume I value your opinion on the subject?

drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 259, inspectorscout wrote:
In post 242, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 130, Zachstralkita wrote:that wasnt a scum claim btw i just hate those if ur x then y posts
why did you feel the need to even point that out? I think this may be a scum claim.
VOTE: Zach
Why is this a scum claim? 'If ur x then y' posts ARE annoying and they ARE scummy since they express a fact, rather than an opinion - oh, that is convenient, scum hates giving opinions because they have a harder time finding valid reasons to accuse someone of being scum. Posts like that are fillers, empty posts that have words in them but dont bring progress. Then my question is: why is saying that so scummy?
It is very scummy to point out that something wasn't a scum claim. Town wouldn't even think to post that! Paranoid scum post that.

A+++ deductive strategy, see how far that one gets ya

go on

Dunnstral · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 8:59 am

In post 258, Blue Yoshi wrote:I've seen how these things tend to go. Triv will come back, say some more incomprehensible things in their next few posts, get scumread a whole bunch, and then get lynched.

Yeah hopefully

Blue Yoshi wrote: also the wagon didn't seem to generate very much information besides drmy's incredibly opportunistic hop on.

I disagree that the wagon didn't generate much information, I think it's weird to have only gotten something from drmyshotty there

Dunnstral · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 9:00 am

In post 261, Zachstralkita wrote:What made you assume I value your opinion on the subject?

Doesn't matter what you value as I'm saying we're not lynching Raskol or scout today

Dunnstral · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 9:01 am

Zach did you open any spoiler except the one about you

inspectorscout · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 9:03 am

A while ago i also said 'i know this looks scummy but' and nobody ever mentioned that.
Zach, why so arrogant? If you are town you should care about our opinions, youre not some infallible scumhunting god. This game is all about working together, not about saying 'who said i care about what you think'.

Zachstralkita · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 9:06 am

In post 265, inspectorscout wrote:A while ago i also said 'i know this looks scummy but' and nobody ever mentioned that.
Zach, why so arrogant? If you are town you should care about our opinions, youre not some infallible scumhunting god. This game is all about working together, not about saying 'who said i care about what you think'.

Oh I'm all for your opinions, just not his

Zachstralkita · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 9:07 am

Dunnstral wrote:
In post 261, Zachstralkita wrote:What made you assume I value your opinion on the subject?
Doesn't matter what you value as I'm saying we're not lynching Raskol or scout today

This is the guy that wants to lynch Trivium lmfao

Zachstralkita · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 9:08 am

Anyways, I'm sorry. I attribute my overaggressiveness to being beat with jumper cables in my youth.

Dunnstral · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 9:19 am

He's lying

Transcend · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 12:32 pm

@Yoshi sorry you didn't like 200-201. I was just explaining in depth the mechanics of this website in comparison to others. I disagree that those posts were my heaviest ones though.

Transcend · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 2:19 pm

Dead dumb game

Zachstralkita · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 2:27 pm

Is it my fault that it's dead? I'll accept that it's my fault that it's dumb, sure.

Dunnstral · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 2:33 pm

I'm trying as hard as I can over here

Gonna need like 5 replacements or something or everyones just late to the party

Zach let's lynch bacde, what say you?

Zachstralkita · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Sat May 28, 2016 2:34 pm

What if he's

an important role or something