Raskol's townIn post 501, Creature wrote:
I'm town
Zach's town
JarJar's town
Inspectorscout is town
AlpacaAlpaca is ???
Hey look how the votes are lined up
Raskol's townIn post 501, Creature wrote:
No it's not
I figure if I repeat myself enough you'll make some sort of argument as to why he is town
Is that how you justify your votes so far?In post 539, drmyshottyizsik wrote:statistically town is usually lynched day one
Because that's what you said.In post 518, Bacde wrote:what makes you think I can't explain it?In post 497, JarJarDrinks wrote:Dude seriously? You're reasoning for townreading scout was basically "uh IDK, cause". You can't seriously be trying to move people off his wagon for a gut townread that u cant explain?
In post 478, Bacde wrote:I don't have an answer for why scout can't be scum besides that I townread him.
I think it explains my play style. My actions need no justification.In post 540, Dunnstral wrote:Is that how you justify your votes so far?In post 539, drmyshottyizsik wrote:statistically town is usually lynched day one
I am confused are you disagreeing because you are the only one who got a null- or are you disagreeing on the fact that I posted a read list. If it is on the read list thanIn post 539, drmyshottyizsik wrote:See alpaca I disagree, I think day one scum have much more to gain by knowing where everyone stands. After n1 and observable actions have been performed, then info comes in. Right now we have to solve a riddle with out knowing the specifics of riddle the answer or having any clue. So, unless you are trying to screw up the people solving the riddle why do you need to know early on who think what about the answerless, questionless and clue less puzzle. Day two is when people start to solve things, based off of day one. In other words day one I greatly prefer to have everyone go at it and have high powered wagons. Sometimes good information comes from this day 1 and we could get lucky and catch scum. However, statistically town is usually lynched day one and it is based on day one that we will have a place to start day 2.
(I just noticed now it was supposed to be "not actually" not "no actually")As I said it is my feelings at this very moment now that I have caught up. I posted it because IIn post 537, AlpacaAlpaca wrote:Here are my feelings so far in a nice pretty(no actually) read list.
This is you arguing with me about semantics and pretending to have caught me in some sort of trap, lmaoIn post 541, JarJarDrinks wrote:Because that's what you said.In post 518, Bacde wrote:what makes you think I can't explain it?In post 497, JarJarDrinks wrote:Dude seriously? You're reasoning for townreading scout was basically "uh IDK, cause". You can't seriously be trying to move people off his wagon for a gut townread that u cant explain?
In post 478, Bacde wrote:I don't have an answer for why scout can't be scum besides that I townread him.