Personality and Popularity in the Speakeasy (A Study!)

Davsto · Post Post #23 (isolation #0) » Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:51 pm

In post 6, mykonian wrote:it's just a model

Davsto · Post Post #24 (isolation #1) » Sun Jun 26, 2016 5:51 pm

Also /in

Davsto · Post Post #68 (isolation #2) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:40 am

In post 67, Oman wrote:
In post 65, Oman wrote:
In post 63, Kublai Khan wrote:How does this not violate the privacy of those posting sensitive information in Speakeasy?
Whilst I know it's not being Googlecrawled, this is still the free-and-open internet. I don't think anyone should be under the illusion that the speakeasy is "Secret".

This is a private forum. Content posted in here, especially as it relates to people personally, should not be repeated or referred to outside the Speakeasy.

Huh, that's from the rules. I guess I just had a different expectation of what privacy/secrecy really means. How interesting.

Well then I guess we shouldn't let anyone refer to the SUPP results at all since that happened in the Speakeasy

Or the Crummies

Or make titles referring to stuff that happened in the Speakeasy...

I think it's fair to say this rule is pretty outdated and inadequate, and to suddenly now act on it in regards to a thread seems questionable imo.

Davsto · Post Post #76 (isolation #3) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:42 am

I heard cooldog wanks a lot

Davsto · Post Post #118 (isolation #4) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 6:32 pm

In post 80, Kublai Khan wrote:You guys are being glib, but there was a long time between Reck coming out on the website and Reck coming out to his parents.

I know it's a longshot that any potential damage will arise of this, but I'd like to ask Psyche to shut this down for now until we can review the IBM confidentiality stuff.

Oh you fucking killjoy

Are you seriously trying to get this shut down because a string of 6000 words likely with just a username and (rarely) first name attached goes to a source which probably won't but may read it even though they likely have no clue who the user is and can't really do fuck all about it

This is just fucking ridiculous. Come on.

Davsto · Post Post #139 (isolation #5) » Tue Jun 28, 2016 6:13 am

In post 138, Ether wrote:I made a version of the (currently) ranked data that's easier to read.

Also jesus I am at the crazy extremes on this thing. Some of it I can totally buy, but, uh. I really,
really
hope I'm not the least depressed person here.

This is more interesting to me

For example, I am apparently ranked 145 for anger, but it is still one of my more present traits because apparently everyone on this site is angry (who knew)

Also me being ranked 5 for adventurousness is frankly almost comical