Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!

[PJ.]

Unvote, Vote:BM

Prosecuted on page 1 is bad BM.

[PJ.]

I think I meant "prosecuting". And it's cause I felt he was voting for serious on the vote he put down so i voted him saying serious vote on page 1 is bad and scummy.

[PJ.]

My scumdar just shook so much it fell off the end of the table and broke.

Unvote, Vote:Peers.

[PJ.]

Why are we letting Peers, who pretty much told us all to fuck off, off the hook?

[PJ.]

Has everyone even posted yet this game?

[PJ.]

TS is not over-aggressive. She pointed out the truth, it's that simple.

FoS:Mert and Hasdgfas

For both saying nothing more then "This wagon is nice and safe and no one will notice. Actually,

Unvote

I need to see more from these two but these guys are right up there with peers. I want to vote Hasd because Mert just got her but i don't think that is a legitmate excuse to pick one over the other. We should really look at those two.

[PJ.]

Actually, I think I've only played with you once, and it was like in feburary, so i don't know you playstyle. I'll

Vote:Hasdgfas

and simply say,"I better see Mert"

[PJ.]

ABR and Schis provided reasons shortly after. Jordan never said anything, which is suspicious but not as suspicious as saying what you said. You said "This wagon looks good"

[PJ.]

You just plagerized everyone else stance on the matter.

[PJ.]

But plagerism just means your full of shit.

[PJ.]

Is it some kind of sick and sadistic irony that the guy with the Hitman avatar is lurking in the proverbial shadows?

[PJ.]

I'm voting for hasdgfas.

[PJ.]

lol, I did, that's why I signed up. Anyway, I believe that hasdgfas and peers are scum, hasd trying to bus his buddy.

[PJ.]

So, are we lynching hasd or peers?

[PJ.]

way to be inconspicious BM

[PJ.]

Unvote, Vote:Peers

I want to lynch Sikario based on him admiring BM. That alone is reason to lynch someone.

[PJ.]

Wow, Peers is ridiculously scum. How by the way, Peers, learn to read. Hasd has a post where he plagiarizes everyone elses reasons for voting you up to that point. Read it, understand it, and stop asking for reasons. I am definently with Ergo and Yos on this, Peers is much more interesting in people's perceptions then scum catching.

On the theory of him distancing with his list, I'm going to nip it in the bud immediately. If he is scum, and really did distance from his buddy, it's jordan. For one, a vote is more distance then saying your scum with an almost non-reason. Secondly, "I know I'm clean."


Toaster what was that comment based on?

[PJ.]

Erg0, please remember we are talking about BM here.

[PJ.]

If peers wasn't scum I'd switch my vote.

[PJ.]

I don't like how carried away TS is..

[PJ.]

wow, nice peers.

[PJ.]

Well, either ABR is vig and just got himself a NK or he is a Night Jester, or he is simply ABR(the tard).

[PJ.]

It feels like distancing. MoS and TS are both experianced players, know what is and isn't out of character of eacher and each have more then enough games under their belt to be metagamed. I have a feeling MoS is looking bad for TS to look good. This theory is far-fetched but it's all I got on the situation.

Still voting peers.

[PJ.]

This is effectively clouding the judgement of townies. Because MoS could be town and TS is most likely town and they are simply arguing with each other forcing the town to go on a witch hunt.

[PJ.]

Quagmire, depending on the other pieces in the puzzle, could be scum. If peers is scum, It could mean MoS is scum and TS is town. This could very well mean quag is either playing poorly or is giving MoS the benefikt of the doubt due to tenure.

Right now, that's what I see of quag, He is voting TS due to him knowing MoS for a long while. That doesn't stop im from being advantageuous scum voting for whoever in the arguement of two towns.

The biggest thing to me is peers lynch. I would like an alignment to go off of before we continue discussing MoS TS and Quag.

[PJ.]

I don't know if i responded to prod so i am, I will reread and post at a later date.

[PJ.]

Vote:Quagmire

[PJ.]

makes no sense and is bad policy

[PJ.]

I think Quag is scum but I can see a TS/Jordan scum team.

[PJ.]

man I was first on quag's wagon, I'm good a scum catching.

[PJ.]

.... all the color-coded quotes are hurting my brain, people. Simplify, simplify, simplify...

[PJ.]

OMG,

Unvote, Vote:ABR

He confessed and it's in BLUE!

[PJ.]

"I love little girls, they make me feel sooo good"

[PJ.]

pfft, Schism is scum.

[PJ.]

I'm of the thinking one is guilty until proven innocent, but then you have that whole burden of proof fallacy thing.

[PJ.]

Quag, Schism actually said something smart. In a situation where the only true proof is one's Role PM(which you can't show) should the burden still be placed on the one making the accusation?

[PJ.]

Unvote Vote MoS

I'm with K-Scope

[PJ.]

I'm glad I have my vote on quag already.

[PJ.]

I was the first on quag's wagon and am voting quag

[PJ.]

wait I unvote for MoS for some random reason. I'm very lost in this game.

[PJ.]

Unvote, Vote:Peers

I'm going to go back to this vote. I think this is where i should put it to after all of the TS tunneling crap.

[PJ.]

I dislike quag's claim..but I don't want to be part of the group he looped under won't believe him anyway..

[PJ.]

Unvote:VoteKScope

[PJ.]

Unvote Vote:Toaster Strudle

[PJ.]

Why am I being voted?

[PJ.]

Replace me, I have zero interest in catching up and i'm not a fan of 50 page days

[PJ.]

Back In.

[PJ.]

Alright, I'm totally lost and I think just about everyplayer in this game has been replaced from what I remember. So I'm gonna go re-read that 46 page Day 1 and try to see if I can retain this game.

[PJ.]

what is it?

[PJ.]

These colors seriously hurt my head.

[PJ.]

Unvote, Vote:BM

Honestly, I don't like the colors, it was what turned me off of this particular game inj the first place, on top of me having life issues at the time. I had/have no intiative to make an effort in this game other then it's for Shanba. I make cases, just not in this game(I have gotten you lynched before, you should remember). Also, I have no intention of belittling Vollkan because I'm sure his post has a lot of great content in it, just none that I'm going to read.

[PJ.]

Responding to prod.

[PJ.]

Unvote, Vote:Schism

[PJ.]

Panzer - I don't like any of the posts I've read by him. He is basically saying he's not ever going to play, but he hasn't been replaced? Are we even looking for a replacement? I think it's more likely he's scum trying to skate by with that crap.

I'm not going to be replaced and most likely my activity will remain the same until I read...*read backwards for a bit to find the quote* Reading this game is by far my last priority so chances are I probably won't play but am not going to get replaced because Shanba doesn't want to find a replacement for a game on page 80 on D2.

[PJ.]

unvote

dont kill me.

ill do whatever it takes.

How about you actually scumhunt.

Schism doesn't know how to scum hunt. T-T-T-T-Triple Post.

[PJ.]

Baahh..now it is a T-T-T-T-Triple Post.

[PJ.]

The problem with his agruement..is he sucks at mafia so he always comes off as a fouled mouthed teenager that his clearly everyone else's mental midget.

[PJ.]

My vote is on him. It is saying that he is argung that he is trying to act "too scummy, But he plays this way in every game. And you saying he's using the retarded scum strategy, but again he's retardly scummy in every game.

[PJ.]

Seconded on the activity bit.

[PJ.]

Vote: Toaster Strudle

responding to prod.

[PJ.]

Sup. *post* Shanba is an aweome mod. Stop being jerks.

[PJ.]

no. raaaawr. Shanba no lazy.

[PJ.]

Hi, I'm mocking you with a contentless post.

[PJ.]

I was vanilla.