alright, targeting you thenIn post 20, McMenno wrote:okay, I want to make one thing clear here:
DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, TARGET ME AT NIGHT
that is all
This is false and you know it.In post 47, Vedith wrote:No, I believe all roles are from page 1 only.In post 45, McMenno wrote:more than 100, actually
uh you die in the first night? it's literally a n1 suicidal townie 10/13 timesIn post 73, Titus wrote:Docs do suck. I basically single handedly won as a hider in this. I cannot see why anyone discards compulsive mafia killer.
every time you've voted you've done it on four separate lines.In post 123, Vedith wrote:How do you know my role?In post 122, LAMIST wrote:Eggman's 49 is terrible, he's attacking Vedith for being a quadruple voter.
I wasn't asking scum for their opinions.In post 306, Vedith wrote:I don't want their opinions.In post 305, Eggman wrote:Also Tricksted Fate to post.
I don't know how you play normally, but this is a terrible defense. Who confirmed you, anyway? LAMIST in their wall?In post 399, Vedith wrote:Exactly! It's not how I play as scum!In post 398, Radical Rat wrote:I have no idea. Not much of your play HAS made sense this game though.
I am confirmed town anyway so lynching me is against wincon.
Menno was a cult. =! mafia?In post 433, eagerSnake wrote:This is over. McMenno Vedith and Eggman were the scum this game. Get to lynching
In post 425, Radical Rat wrote:Sorry, I don't drink wine.Vedith wrote:My play is too scummy to be scum, think about it.
Isn't that what the point of Grandest Idea is..? To give people roles they wouldn't have?In post 456, Vedith wrote:People self meta all the time, it's not actually an issue.In post 453, lane0168 wrote:VOTE: vedith
I've seen the too scummy to be scum defense used on other people, and be completely wrong more often than not. I've never seen it used in oneself. That's absurd
I will confirm again - I have 4 votes, I cannot be scum.
Probably in {snake, lane, farside, shadow}.In post 471, Vedith wrote: Tell me who is my scum buddy then? We can work on finding read scum.
I don't think you're scum to be honest, so I want to work with you.
Sorry, Rat... I slept. But, I'm back and ready to hammer.In post 482, Radical Rat wrote:Actually, now that I think about it, I haven't seen a post from Ivo all day. We can put pressure there and see what happens until you post this magical proof.
VOTE: Doc 'Botnik( Eggman )
If you do this, I will ignore the intent.In post 487, Vedith wrote:Lane ignoring the Eggman wagon!
More votes here, get him to L1 so we can pressure him into talking.
Thank you.In post 568, Radical Rat wrote:In post 482, Radical Rat wrote:Have you been at work for the past 13 hours? I don't want this rushed necessarily, I'm just seeing a bunch of reasons to scumread you and none not to.In post 471, Vedith wrote:I'm at work, I can't post a case now, why do you want this rushed?In post 470, Radical Rat wrote:I mean, any time you feel like posting this defense of yours, go for it.
You've had over 12 hours, and have been active throughout.
I agree with not rushing the day, but stalling while we wait for some specific post isn't exactly making the most out of our time either.
Tell me who is my scum buddy then? We can work on finding read scum.
I don't think you're scum to be honest, so I want to work with you.
As far as your scum buddy goes... One might not exist. If the game doesn't end with your death though, I'd probably sheep Snake on Eggman.
Actually, now that I think about it, I haven't seen a post from Ivo all day. We can put pressure there and see what happens until you post this magical proof.
VOTE: Doc 'Botnik( Eggman )
In post 590, Vedith wrote:I know you know, but what am I?In post 589, Eggman wrote:I'm stupid and you know it.
...In post 597, Radical Rat wrote: The votecounts.
When all four are on one person it's one whole vote. When split, it's fractions.
Quote of the game right here.In post 614, eagerSnake wrote:Who says I have to make sense
Yes, it is a bad lynch. I recognize my ability to usually be the VI (seems I'm more lurktastic this game) and said that to narrow the player pool to better ones than I. I'm very self-depreciative.Radical Rat wrote:So, you're saying that you're an Okay lynch?In post 602, Eggman wrote:No because I think either of us would be OK-ish lynches? Not good, but not terrible? I'm not sure what I'm saying.
Also, that would still leave me at L-1. Which I don't want.
If you were Town, wouldn't that be a bad lynch?
I kinda wanna call this a scumslip.
Well then?Vedith wrote:Okay I confess, my role makes the game go on forever without any further mod posts when lynched. :<
We can return to this game in 2 years I guess.
I wanted to play like a VT, and it was the closest PR I could find to it.In post 987, farside22 wrote:In post 983, Eggman wrote:I am a Town Self-Voyeur. I compulsively check myself each night, and last night someone investigated me. I'm 100% sure it was Snake.
Now, why did farside take my claim? I think it's rather unlikely that we both have the same role. VOTE: Farside
I didn't claim and I'm not going to.
I also asked players to target me.
So why didn't you if that was true.
