Mini 530: Guitar Hero Mafia: It's Finally Over

[Natude]

<1>d<12>

Vote: Thanatos

because he screwed up the dice roll.

[Natude]

Code: Select all

 
          .N                                 
   ..      DDD...                                
   .DDNDNDN..ONNNNNNDD        . ..... . ....? .    
    N.     ,:.  .~DN7 .    ..DDDDDNDNDDNNN8NDDNDDDNDDNZIN+   
    N,  . ~NN...:~MDDD$:..,ND,   ..  ..  :ND ND      .,8MD    
   .D.   .IMM   :=, .,NDNNNDOOOOOO .=D888D~.  .8=..?DD. ~N  
   .N.   .ZMN,~~==N. ~7O.  =I77??N  =NNDO  =. =ND  ~DD  ,M8    
 . NN.   ,ZNDDDDDDN ..+D. ~ND..~MN  =N=. =MN. =MD  ~DD=..8N 
 :DDO    ,ZD$.   ~M.  +N. ~NN .=MN  =DN  =MD. =ND .~. :+MM
   ,N.   ,ZNN   ~$M.  +N. ~MN .=MN  =NN .,NN. =DD  =  ~NMN.    
    D+   ,$MM  .=$N. .+N. ~MD .=MN  =ND .~$.  =DD  ~O..=ND   
    NO  ..=MN  .=IN8 .~N. ~MD .=MN  =ND .=DN .=DD  ~D? ~$N.  
    NO    =MN  .=$NDND~   ~MD.,~8N  =NN  =DD. =N,===MN: =
    NO  .,~==, .=NN~. ?NNNZ~NDDDD.===INMD$$N .=MMMNNDDD .
   .N$=ZMMMMN=  =MNZ   .:8NDD7DD?====++I8NN$NNDN.+DDNDO.~
   .NNM7... N  =MNNO  .=NNDN7 ,MDN8  ,,. .=MDI~..  . MDDND
    ND..   NM.=MD$NO   =N:. :,.  =D~ .?ND..=M= . ~=?    8N. 
    ~     :D.$N,=MDO   =M~..=DD. =N~..+NN..~M+   =MM   =8D  
          D,M$ .=MDO   =M~..=ND .=D~..?D~. ~D+   =MM   =8D 
         DN8    =MNO   =M~..=ND .=D~.....~MMN.   =MM   =8D 
        NNDO.   =N...  =M~..:  =?NN~..I..=MNN.   =MM  .=+MD
      .7  .D.   .      =M~..:~MMDDN~..I  =NND=   =MM   =+ND
           N    ~NNO   =M~..=DNN.=M=  +D  =MN=   =MM   =MD  
           N   .=MDO   =M~.., .  =N~..?DD =DD+   =MM   =MD. 
          .N    =MDO   =MNDDI =ZNNN.=~=NN, =N~  .=NN   =MN.  
           N   .=MDO   =M8.:NDMNDDDDDNDNDN .IND?.. ...==MD.  
          .D    =MD,~=~=~N8..ND   ...    8N. +NDD,.~=MNMM
          ,D    =MNDDNNNNDNNN            .
        . D+.====~MN .  . ...                
       .D88MMNNNDM$,.        
     .OD8O+..  .      

Okay, That's just awsome.

[Natude]

FOS Jex. How could you vote haschel because of that?!? You're a bad man.

FOS Cole for not posting yet.

Haschel, did you get that off Gamefaqs.com?

[Natude]

I really wasn't sure how you'd react to my vote on you but....... your reaction isn't sitting well with me

It's not uncommon to vote the rocker who just voted you if it's in the random voting stage. I agree that his logic sucked, but as much as it seems like it at first, it's not a scum tell.

[Natude]

P.S.

Welcome to the game Cole.

[Natude]

This random voting is getting us no where, and with the lack of posting, I'd say we need more information.

ChaosOmega, why did you vote DeliciousGoldfish because he was "not being serious" about his vote? No one had been serious about there vote yet, this is the random voting stage.

FOS-IGMEOY ChaosOmega.

Care to share your thoughts on the vote?

[Natude]

Can we get a few prods here? It's been too long since some of the players have posted, and not just ChaosOmega.

[Natude]

Okay, I think I should

Unvote

now. There's a bit to much going on at the moment. I don't know who to vote, and I think it would be best to just not vote at all yet.

Even so,

FOS: DeliciousGoldfish

[Natude]

Off Topic
I lost "

The Game

"

[Natude]

(Still here, still not seeing much.)

[Natude]

We don't have nearly enough information for a dead line, but we NEED to start posting here. We're on page 5 and we still have nothing to work off. It's driving me crazy!

[Natude]

(Still Here. Still have nothing to comment about.)

[Natude]

(Still Here. Still have nothing to comment about.)

Really now?

Really

really?

Really

really

really.

I don't see anything worth posting/asking about, so I just say I'm still here so as not to be accused of lerking. (It could still be considered lerking, but less likely.)

[Natude]

Okay, this is just too much. The last two posts were okay, but I

really

don't like post 142/143.

Thanatos was the first one to accuse me of putting an L-2 pressure vote. Lynch the obvscum.

Unvote; Vote: Thanatos

It seems d3sisted is eather stuped town, or poorly playing scum. Eather way, you better get your act together fast.

However, it's a policy of mine that L-2 is never to be reached in a pressure vote. In a big game, L-3. You stepped over that line, and I voted you.

I cmpleately agree with that, but I close to voting anyway.

[Natude]

Things I don't like:

* Natude being very noncommittal. The last post was a good start, but I'm very surprised it took him as long as it did to comment about d3sisted, and he kept sayiung he had nothing to discuss shortly after I had presented a possible case against hasdgfas that he could have agreed or disagreed with.

Sorry about the "not saying a damned thing" bit, but I really don't see anything that looks all that scummy (other than what I said in post 148), and I don't like saying things just for the sake of saying things.

I'll try to post a bit more content, but don't blame me if it doesn't really get us anywhere.

[Natude]

(Still Here. Still have nothing to comment about.)

Really now?

Really

really?

Really

really

really.

I don't see anything worth posting/asking about, so I just say I'm still here so as not to be accused of lerking. (It could still be considered lerking, but less likely.)

Now that's an interesting thing to say..


Why would you be worried about being accused of lerking? Do you have a guilty conscious? Is it because you are scum?

(This quote is geting way too long...)

I'm worried about being accused of lerking because I've been lynched for it as town in the past. That and I find lerking suspisious myself.

I don't want to do what I don't like other people doing.

[Natude]

You keep saying you're worried about "lurking", but you're still doing it; it's just active lurking.

You just quoted me on something where I admit I'm lurking. What am I suposed to do? I can't see anything we might be able to work off.

I'll work with perfect628, but just becouse have nothing better to use.

perfect628, I want to have your thoughts on this by thursday or I'm going to vote.

[Natude]

Vote: d3sisted

for reasons stated in post 148.

Sorry guys, I just don't really see anything else scummy.

I think I'll just post when ever I see somthing I don't agree with, or I find

slightly

scummy. It's better than what I'm doing now.

[Natude]

But Natude really got to me with his calling others off for "lerking" even though every one of his posts were just a bunch of useless words talking about other people's "lerking." Natude was in fact, quite the lurker: nothing to say, gonna post, got nothing to say, he's "lerking", i don't have anything. LAME.

I don't think I've accused anyone of lerking thus far. I even admit that I'm lerking. Mabey you just misinterpreted my posts, I won't hold it against you.

[Natude]

I don't think I've accused anyone of lerking thus far.

Alright. How about these:

FOS Cole for not posting yet.

Okay, this was a lerk accusation, (must mave missed that.) but it was on page 2, cole hadn't posted ANYTHING yet, (not even "hi") and I didn't know I'd come out with nothing to post eather.

with the lack of posting, I'd say we need more information.

This was

not

a lerk accusation.

Can we get a few prods here? It's been too long since some of the players have posted, and not just ChaosOmega.

This could be called a lerk accusation, but I thought prods were to make sure people were still there...

(Still here, still not seeing much.)

The heck? How is this a lerk accusation?

We don't have nearly enough information for a dead line, but we NEED to start posting here. We're on page 5 and we still have nothing to work off. It's driving me crazy!

This was much like #2, but to a greater extreme.

Directly, no, you really haven't accused anybody.

#1 mabey...

And I know you've said you haven't seen anything to comment on, but you should find something. I just don't like the fact that you've openly admitted to lurking, but are angry at people for doing the same.

I've been saying I'll try, that's the best I can do.

[Natude]

At the moment, I'm starting to postulate that you and d3s are scumbuddies and you're trying to save him from today's lynch by getting attention onto Natude.

That was a good catch, but I just did a quick reread and I think it's really the only thing supporting your pair.

hasdgfas: Good catch on d3sisted. Maybe ChaosOmega and d3sisted are scum! Wouldn't that be nice to catch 'em both so quickly...

And I definitely do NOT believe that there even is a jester. That was a joke about how d3sisted is still making scummy moves so early in the game...

These are reasons why this is not a pair.

I'll try to do a better reread tomarrow and spell out my suspisions.

[Natude]

Okay, I just did a reread, and will try to break down my thoughts on the players.

Thanatos:

I like what I see of him so far. He's lighthearted, He has good logic, and he's careful not to get to close to lynching before we're confident of the offenders alignment. He's been asking good questions to get more information, and he always gives his reasonings for what he does.

My thoughts: Pro Town

Haschel Cedricson:

Not posting that much, but when he dose, he has somthing to say. His logic's pretty good, but I don't agree with half of it. He makes good observations, but sometimes it looks like he's serching for somthing to be suspisious of.

My thoughts: 40/60 Pro Mafia

Jex:

Very few posts, but good posts. Whenever she posts she's getting somewhere. Sometimes to do something that needs to get done (like unvoting), sometimes asking questions, sometimes giving her thoughts... The problem is that she has only posted twise after the random voting stage, and we haven't heard from her since page five. Mabey we need a prod...

My thoughts: Leaning Town

DeliciousGoldfish:

I like the questions she's been asking throughout the game so far, and I see nothing scummy in what votes she placed and when. She has good logic in her posts, and will make jokes at the same time. I've yet to se a mafia who will do that.

My thoughts: Pro Town

ChaosOmega:

He starts out on a really bad note with post 40, after that comes the vote Jex out of nowhere. Once that is over, he comes back to look pretty good. I like his logic and he asks good questions. He's had his smack in the face, I say we should stop brewding on it.

My thoughts: Leaning Town

hasdgfas:

Not asking many questions, but his logic is great. When he sees something scummy, He'll jump on it and keep it going until there's no reason to continue, and he knows when to just leave somthing alone. These are good traits for a scum, but he dosen't do it in a way that seems scummy.

My thoughts: Toss Up

Gorrad:

We're really not getting much out of this guy. He's been asking questions and making comments, but I can't find any tells. He's hard for me to read. The only tell I can find, is think this was Sparta for a bit. I don't think a mafia would pay that little attention.

My thoughts: 60/40 Pro Town

Cole:

He's like Gorrad for me right now. Not much content in his posts, and I can't get any tells. The only thing I have on this guy right now is gut feeling. -,-

My thoughts: 60/40 Pro Town

perfect628:

He's doing what I'm doing but with less posts. I can see why you guys get on my case for lerking, but this guy's even worse.

My thoughts: Leaning Mafia

SilverPhoenix:

Not giving us anything. He's lerking as much as me and perfect628. He seems to dismiss everything by everyone as not scummy, and I don't like that

My thoughts: Leaning Mafia

d3sisted:

The first thing I don't like is the flip. Espesealy since there were only seven posts in between. After making what he thought was a L-2 vote, he says that he's not "pushing hard" and just wanted to put on some presure. Then says it was not a flip, then "I am jester" (The heck?), then he says he only made one contradicting post, then he says ChaosOmega "wasn't in any danger whatsoever of a lynch", then he accuses Thanatos of voting him on a "Lynch the obvscum" basis, then he admits it

was

a flip, then he votes perfect, saying "he hasn't actually done anything but follow" (This one's sort of pro town). After this whole sequence I think we should lynch him.

My thoughts:

Vote: d3sisted

[Natude]

Err... Atticus?

You still here?

[Natude]

Which is kind of sad, because it was only 20 posts ago...

[Natude]

I'd like to keep playing. It may not be easy, but we'll find people.

[Natude]

I'm glad that we're back on track. It'll be nice to get the game moving again, and we seem to be getting more information now.

Sweatpants, Dark, thanks a lot for filling in. We really needed more posts, and you guys might have saved the game.

Thanks ^.^

[Natude]

Welcome to the gane Seraphic! You're in a tough spot, but best of luck! It'll be interesting to find out how this turns out.

The replacements are already working wonders, the post count has gone way up!

[Natude]

I am facing three different emotions right now.

1: I agree with hasdgfas' post #248

2: Other than post #248 I like Seraphic's case

3: I'm always influenced more by really long posts, so I don't know what to think.

I'll

unvote

for now to see how this plays out. I think it will help me make a better decision.

[Natude]

*sigh*
It looks looks I'm back to my old lerking self.

Even in this time of need, I don't see that much to post about.

The deadline could be bad news, and I would like to SweatPants to post his thoughts so far.

[Natude]

I like Haschel's post 280, and I like SM's defense. What I

don't

like is SM putting so much emphasis on what a stretch the motives were.

It's a perfectly logical idea, and it seems like it could easily be true. SM's defense was a good one, but it doesn't seem entirely truthful. I do, however, think that SM's defense nullifys Haschel's last two quotes.

SM's emphasis on the motives being a stretch is what really doesn't sit well with me, but after all the cases on DG, I think she's the best vote.

Vote: DeliciousGoldfish

[Natude]

um, Mod, I voted DG on the last page. That means she has 7 votes. That's a lynch

Err... Thanatos, I think you miss calculated. DG now has 6 votes. Me, SM, Haschel, Sweatpants, Gorrad, and you.

[Natude]

Bah, go town.