In post 899, eagerSnake wrote:I mean I'd believe that scum is likely distributed: 1-2 scum on me, 0-1 scum on s_s, 0-2 scum off both
But that doesn't narrow anything down at this stage
Okay. Good start, let's keep going. Who are those scum?
In post 894, Zoronos wrote:Based on his ISO, I feel that Shadow's actions comport with someone that was planning a counterclaim. Which means my prior scumreads were super wrong, but super wrong it is.
In post 902, nn30 wrote:In post 894, Zoronos wrote:Based on his ISO, I feel that Shadow's actions comport with someone that was planning a counterclaim. Which means my prior scumreads were super wrong, but super wrong it is.
He didn't actually press snake all that hard. He's stated in 869 that all he got out of it was that Boring is town.
Keep in mind the context of a town!Shadow_Step this game. Leading up to when Shadow CC'd, Eager is 100% scum in his mind. If the only information he manged to gather before the CC is that Boring is town, he didn't get enough information to make a CC worthwhile.
This feels all the more scummy since Shadow said in 693 the "This is standard play when you have a guilty on someone. You try to get reads out of them so that you can easily find out who is most likely their buddy."
He didn't do that at all.
His reasoning for this is that "I didn't want Eager to know I was onto him." Bah. I call BS on that one. He's giving scum way too much credit.
In post 903, eagerSnake wrote:1-2 Scum on me is in [boring, PenguinPower, Gamma Emerald] All 3 of these nearly equally likely.
0-1 Scum on s_s is in [nn30, LUV] More likely LUV than nn30 IMO, but I could be wrong here, or they both could be town.
0-2 Scum off wagons is in [MariaR, implosion, Dierfire, Grendel, Prism, Zoronos] These I'm at a loss for.
1-2 Scum on me is in [boring, PenguinPower, Gamma Emerald] All 3 of these nearly equally likely.0-1 Scum on s_s is in [nn30, LUV] More likely LUV than nn30 IMO, but I could be wrong here, or they both could be town.0-2 Scum off wagons is in [MariaR, implosion, Dierfire, Grendel, Prism, Zoronos] These I'm at a loss for.
In post 904, Zoronos wrote:In post 902, nn30 wrote:In post 894, Zoronos wrote:Based on his ISO, I feel that Shadow's actions comport with someone that was planning a counterclaim. Which means my prior scumreads were super wrong, but super wrong it is.
He didn't actually press snake all that hard. He's stated in 869 that all he got out of it was that Boring is town.
Keep in mind the context of a town!Shadow_Step this game. Leading up to when Shadow CC'd, Eager is 100% scum in his mind. If the only information he manged to gather before the CC is that Boring is town, he didn't get enough information to make a CC worthwhile.
This feels all the more scummy since Shadow said in 693 the "This is standard play when you have a guilty on someone. You try to get reads out of them so that you can easily find out who is most likely their buddy."
He didn't do that at all.
His reasoning for this is that "I didn't want Eager to know I was onto him." Bah. I call BS on that one. He's giving scum way too much credit.
He kept touchstoning Eager. 122, 168, 279, 280, 296.
401, 413, 415, 418. I'm stopping at the point of the CC, for obvious reasons.
He tried to build a train on Penguin based on Penguin ignoring (343) a question about Eager, asked in 263.
In [post]169[/[post] he explicitly foreshadows a delayed counterclaim.
Town!SS didn't feel a need to bury Eager manually because he believed he had a CC for that.
This was either planned out from the very beginning of the game, or SS is legit.
In post 907, eagerSnake wrote:What do you want from me?
I had my vote on boring all day and nobody even nibbled at it, usually I would think scum would at least take a nibble at it. This makes it more likely boring is scum. Also boring seems happy with this conflict and jumped on me without any question, also used the gambler's fallacy to her own defense.
In post 913, Zoronos wrote:In post 907, eagerSnake wrote:What do you want from me?
I had my vote on boring all day and nobody even nibbled at it, usually I would think scum would at least take a nibble at it. This makes it more likely boring is scum. Also boring seems happy with this conflict and jumped on me without any question, also used the gambler's fallacy to her own defense.
Okay, let's talk more about this. What other posts of Boring's make you think she's scum? Anything from before the counterclaim-athon?
In post 917, eagerSnake wrote:In post 913, Zoronos wrote:In post 907, eagerSnake wrote:What do you want from me?
I had my vote on boring all day and nobody even nibbled at it, usually I would think scum would at least take a nibble at it. This makes it more likely boring is scum. Also boring seems happy with this conflict and jumped on me without any question, also used the gambler's fallacy to her own defense.
Okay, let's talk more about this. What other posts of Boring's make you think she's scum? Anything from before the counterclaim-athon?
She seemed to be trying to buddy me at the start of the game, and when realized that wasn't going to work went the other route
In post 916, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
It seemed implied and either way, I never said that was my reason for voting for you.