In post 43, Grendel wrote:boring wrote:In post 36, Grendel wrote:@Boring You don't even have a witty one-liner to go with your vote... that's really... boring...
You say that like it's a bad thing.
I like it when people make Beowulf jokes. Do you not like people referencing your name in jokes?
QUESTIONS FOR EVERYBODY
1) What is your preferred alignment?
2) Are you often mislynched? If so, why is that?
3) Can you describe your play style concisely in one sentence?
4) If you were the deciding vote at lylo with the slot above you, and the slot below you, which player would you lynch and why? (Ex: 1 would be deciding between 13, and 2. 2 would be deciding between 1 and 3. 3 would decide between 2 and 4.)
5) How excited are you for this game?Gamma Emerald wrote:Nah Eager is lame, you're the one I want to see in action!
What am I? Chopped liver?
In post 136, PenguinPower wrote:2.) Never been mislynched. Come close several times, but never.
In post 140, boring wrote:We've too many players who fall into your "unacceptable RVS vote" category for them all to be scum. How'd you come to the conclusion that this one in particular is scum?
Also, what do you think of Implosion sheeping you with what amounts to a naked vote?
In post 208, Zoronos wrote:Shadowstep, sorry. My mistake.
What is your opinion on Grendel, since it sounds like you know him better?
In post 276, eagerSnake wrote:There's a scum who is intent on breaching the town block /note
In post 280, Shadow_step wrote:@Boring, since you are around, what is you read on Eager atm, regarding his claim and stuff?
In post 329, boring wrote:Gamma is acting exactly like he did in our last game. I tunnelled him for it because he's easy to mislynch. I'm also doubting my scum read on Zoronos. He's just barrelled on without a single adjustment to his behavior. It's not something I'd expect from someone I'm scum-reading for being fake. They're each either cleverer at playing scum than I'm willing to entertain at the moment, or they're not scum.
UNVOTE:
In post 336, Gamma Emerald wrote:
The fact that so many people townread me and yet he doesn't makes him Town.
In post 263, Shadow_step wrote:
This is a very safe stance
How can you believe him and not town read him even if slightly ?
Like mafia ascetic is very strong modifier for mafia, unless you believe that town would have those many PRs to counter that.
Hence you null read him. But I doubt you would have thought that much.
In post 398, MariaR wrote:N30 has been obv town since the start of this.
The fact gamma isn't obv town when I've obv town read him before is worrying
the LUV townreads make me laugh.
I'm gonna look more into a few players that don't need names but with the amount of people I am slowly going like "you can be town" these players are....
In post 404, nn30 wrote:In post 397, Shadow_step wrote:Like nn30 is ob town after that. Unless he is a very good scum player. I'll have to check his games to make sure.
@nn I was already voting PP and I had given reasons to vote him.
@Shadow_Step - You're not getting out of this by town reading me. So many people have done that already that it's about the safest thing in the world to do.
I would like responses to 366 & 395.
In post 416, eagerSnake wrote:Are they important questions to the current gamestate? (i.e. on-topic)
In post 121, Shadow_step wrote:This game just got easy .
In post 122, Shadow_step wrote:Kidding lol
Hello eager, do you have any early reads?
Anyone else can also answer this.
In post 650, nn30 wrote:In post 642, Shadow_step wrote:In post 121, Shadow_step wrote:This game just got easy .In post 122, Shadow_step wrote:Kidding lol
Hello eager, do you have any early reads?
Anyone else can also answer this.
Eager is probably a goon and would be doing most of the kills and hence might have the biggest chance of getting caught so he claimed to have ascetic.
I'm town ascetic.
First thing I did after reading Eager's claim was confirm with the mod that he sent me the right role PM.
That's a bold claim there.
This means that
1) Eager Snake intentionally chose an obscure role.
2) The mod also chose this obscure role to give to you.
I find that scenario extremely unlikely.
In post 654, eagerSnake wrote:Lol. Why are you waiting until now to bring up that you're Ascetic?
Why aren't you considering the possibility of 2 Town having Ascetic?
In post 690, nn30 wrote:
The first time you do something worthwhile in the game - you question Eager. Consistent with a legit CC.
But then you do nothing with that information. If I knew, from page one or whenever Eager was scum, I'd use him as town-dar. If Eager is scum, I'd assume that any early game wagon he was on was on a townie. Right now, PP is on your scum list (just above Eager).
You even tried to scum hunt penguin.
This means that in addition to the low chance that:
1) Snake chose an obscure modifier
2) The mod also gave you an obscure modifier
You also believe
3) Eager intentionally bussed his partner (penguin), participated in a wagon that could have lolhammered him, pretended to lolhammer him, and then kept his vote there the rest of the game
You're living in a fantasy land.
VOTE: Shadow_Step
Here's some circumstantial evidence that I feel is weaker than what I just presented, but could be relevant.In post 124, Shadow_step wrote:
1. Mafia, cause I love the wifom. But I probably play better as town.
Your RQS answer (what's your favorite alignment) could be seen as you telling us you're the kind of player who would CC as scum. You're fine putting the game on a coin flip.In post 7, Shadow_step wrote:Scum have day chat hence all the fast confirmations huh.
The only type of game where scum would gamble on a CC day one is one where they have day chat. The reaction would have to be coordinated. Maybe you had an idea and your scum buddies decided to run with it. You acknowledge that scum chat exists right here.
In post 695, nn30 wrote:In post 693, Shadow_step wrote:I've been hinting at it all game. Nn is an idiotic townie who can only see what's at the surface
This is standard play when you have a guilty on someone. You try to get reads out of them so that you can easily find out who is most likely their buddy.
On the phone right now so maria can you link to 649?
I had a guilty on maria on night 1. Day 2 I didn't start the day screaming Maria scum maria scum. I pushed her for reads.
That's just it.
You pushed Eager for one read, which he gave you basically nothing on, and then you gave up.
In post 700, nn30 wrote:In post 693, Shadow_step wrote:I've been hinting at it all game. Nn is an idiotic townie who can only see what's at the surface
This is standard play when you have a guilty on someone. You try to get reads out of them so that you can easily find out who is most likely their buddy.
On the phone right now so maria can you link to 649?
I had a guilty on maria on night 1. Day 2 I didn't start the day screaming Maria scum maria scum. I pushed her for reads.
I'm idiot town who has been tunneling the person who is one slot above snake on your scum list. Uh huh.
In post 701, eagerSnake wrote:Only reason he has me as scum is because we have the same modifier lol
In post 715, eagerSnake wrote:I already said you probably wouldn't... why would I say that as scum, rather than just challenge you?
In post 720, nn30 wrote:
I read him starting day 2 of that game - after he got the cop claim on MariaR - he straight tunneled her. Like, "if you ISO me it's pretty obvious this was the cop in hindsight."
Since pointing out that Snake had the same role as him, he's listed snake as his top scum, and then fought with me a bunch. He made 0 effort to move the conversation over to Snake (his top scum).
In post 722, Shadow_step wrote:I didn't do that because they had day chat. If I had made it so obvious. He would have advised his buddies to play in a certain way.
In post 740, eagerSnake wrote:OK well I'm town so what does that mean to you
In post 786, implosion wrote:Maria I think also is coming away from this a lot townier than before.
Unvote
VOTE: boring
In post 797, Prism wrote:I have way, way too many scumreads right now: Implosion, boring, LUV, MariaR, Eager, and nn30. Of the bunch, I'd probably say Maria and boring are the ones least likely to be correct.
nn30's last 10 pages have been a trainwreck. He scumread Implosion, said:In post 319, nn30 wrote:I'm still wary of implosion. Since I'm not getting any traction with him at the moment, I'll drop it and see if I have anything to contribute to the other wagons occurring right now.
but dropped the ball entirely with the followup. I scumread Implosion, explained why, and called for more votes on him-one would imagine nn30 at least taking an interest in one of his top suspects. Instead nn30 didn't even read my post explaining my reads or who I wanted, even when prodded to do so. He never had an interest in who I wanted instead of Gamma/Penguin to begin with, and even less so after the top one was Implosion. Latching onto Gamma and now Shadow and launching all kinds of shit to see what sticks is not a town approach to the game whatsoever. His #690 is noticeably about volume in casework over quality and he admits it. Does anyone here seriously think that Shadow wants to get into a 1v1 Day 1 as scum in a game where town has minimum 2 mislynches? Finallyis a trademark scum post.In post 709, nn30 wrote:I'm the most obv town player here.
Moving on, I think either Eager is mafia or they're both town. Eager is playing this exactly how he should as scum, because there's really no way for him to come out of this alive unless he convinces everyone they're both town.I believe he's ascetic-I don't buy so much that he's a town one. Implosion being one of the ones pushing that eager isn't mafia for it really doesn't ease my mind.
In the meantime, Implosion, would you like to respond to my #591 and #599?
Right now, my vote on Implosion stays, I'd be willing to switch to nn30 if people would stop assuming the guy was town for no reason.
In post 798, implosion wrote:Shadow wrote:Snake IS scum, he didn't claim ascetic, he claimed having ascetic modifier because that doesn't give him protection from being watched doing the kill etc.
He claimed an ascetic modifier rather than ascetic because he doesn't want scum to know that he isn't a power role... or because he's an ascetic power role and wants to claim honestly.
His play makes complete sense if he's town.
In post 811, implosion wrote:The point isn't the game size, it's that it happens in normals. He's claiming that it's bastard; it's very simply not bastard to have a setup like that in a normal with this site's current meta.
In fact it's almost a point in favor of them both being town that podoboq, the mod, was one of the macho townies in that game; it seems likely that he saw that component of the setup design, liked it, and reinterpreted it for whatever setup we have here to get two town ascetics.
But the fact that the examples I can think of off the top of my head happen to be larges isn't important; what's important is that they're games that were judged normal on mafiascum.
In post 823, implosion wrote:shadow wrote:Show me a game with 2 town ascetic and I *might* reconsider.
Macho is not a neg utility like ascetic so this doesn't apply.
Three things.
One, please take a step back for a moment. The fact that you're saying you *might* reconsider if I show you very direct proof that you are wrong means you are being way too goddamn stubborn right now.
Two, there's a first time for everything. I'm not going to look through a thousand mini normals to find a game that has precisely two ascetics; it quite possibly hasn't happened, I have no idea if it has. That, again, does not make it bastard.
Three, ...what? Macho is straight-up a negative utility role. It's probably the single closest modifier to ascetic.
And @zoronos, site meta is very important when shadow's primary line of thought is "X would be bastard on this site, and this is a normal game, therefore X cannot be happening in this game." The first premise is flawed because he doesn't understand site meta.
In post 823, implosion wrote:Three, ...what? Macho is straight-up a negative utility role. It's probably the single closest modifier to ascetic.
In post 839, eagerSnake wrote:Pp why do you.not already have rope if I'm scum I would followed the crowd screaming for your death earlier lol
Seriously, I'm town, get over it
In post 844, nn30 wrote:He's spent the whole game scum reading Eager. Why is the person Eager has parked his vote on on SS's scum list?
In post 849, nn30 wrote:Eager almost got PP killed.
In post 859, nn30 wrote:Bussing with nothing to gain is overrated. Especially on day one.
In post 862, Gamma Emerald wrote:V/LA you fuck
In post 863, nn30 wrote:1) Please, explain your reads in the context of people's interactions with Eager. I've been harping PP but I also disagree with a lot of this list in that context as well. I want your scum explanations as well as your town explanations. If this play of yours is legit, you've done very little with it so far (beyond pushing Eager).
In post 863, nn30 wrote:2) Why did you choose to claim now?
In post 863, nn30 wrote:3) How do the interactions between Snake / Boring indicate that Boring is town?
In post 916, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
It seemed implied and either way, I never said that was my reason for voting for you.
In post 941, nn30 wrote:In post 910, Shadow_step wrote:OMG nn you are biggest dumbfuck ever.
You want me claim ascetic on day 6?
Or, " I don't have enough info yet, so let's on scum eager live another day and lynch someone else." That's what you expect me to do? Are you that fucking dense?
I absolutely expect you to do that.
Sacrificing a townie so that you can identify more scum is absolutely good play.
In post 928, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
I think you're gambling scum who failed to plan out a distraction.
In post 958, eagerSnake wrote:You've literally spent the entirety of this game looking for "my buddies" which don't exist, forming your reads based on my interactions with other players while looking at me through rose tinted glasses. I.e. forming reads based solely on the false assumption that I'm scum
In post 957, nn30 wrote:In post 944, Shadow_step wrote:In post 941, nn30 wrote:In post 910, Shadow_step wrote:OMG nn you are biggest dumbfuck ever.
You want me claim ascetic on day 6?
Or, " I don't have enough info yet, so let's on scum eager live another day and lynch someone else." That's what you expect me to do? Are you that fucking dense?
I absolutely expect you to do that.
Sacrificing a townie so that you can identify more scum is absolutely good play.
No its not
Lynching ob scum is always better than taking a shot in the dark
I'm not saying take a shot in the dark over Eager.
I'm saying you should have let Eager live for a while so that you have some shots in the dark ready for after we kill Eager.
In post 965, eagerSnake wrote:Okay, and when I flip town, how do you intend to survive tomorrows lynch?
In post 979, MariaR wrote:STOP LYNCHING IN THESE CLAIMS BOTH ARE TOWN AND LOOK OUTSIDE IT (I'm catching up so if you are great if not PLEASE)
In post 989, eagerSnake wrote:Maybe this is a special case?
In post 998, Gamma Emerald wrote:
The fact Eager didn't really interact with either of them. I will admit this perception is colored by my read on Dier.
In post 1002, MariaR wrote:Shadow why am I not snakes buddy when I'm the one hardcore defending him?
In post 1014, MariaR wrote:The only time I hard defended a partner is when I was begged to do it in open 646
In post 1030, MariaR wrote:Pls not the puppy faceIn post 1028, Shadow_step wrote:
Can you please vote Eager now?
*makes puppy face*
Prism you shouldn't be okay with the boring wagon because of your scum reads and you should be voting eager.
I don't see why eager would claim right at day start as scum
his logic seems to add up at least to me
Honestly I'm at the point where if boring doesn't flip scum I'm gonna take another look at snake I really think you're just wrong here.
In post 1046, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:In post 959, Shadow_step wrote:In post 928, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
I think you're gambling scum who failed to plan out a distraction.
Jesus Christ, stop playing you're fucking terrible. Gambiting mafia lmao
You're the one that's terrible my friend. The only case you have on Eager is that you cannot fathom that both you and him were given the same role. You either refuse or won't take into consideration a town motive for lying. If Eager had not claimed, your read on him would be null. You have no backup plan if he flips town and if he flips scum, it's an excuse to push on anyone who defended him or didn't vote for him.
In post 1222, nn30 wrote:In post 1221, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1219, MariaR wrote:Anyone on eagers wagon who can answer this:
Why does scum eager claim day 1 when he'd be the most powerful maf role?
Why does scum eager claim day 1 when he'd be the most powerful maf role?
Why does scum eager claim day 1 when he'd be the most powerful maf role?
Why does scum eager claim day 1 when he'd be the most powerful maf role?
Why does scum eager claim day 1 when he'd be the most powerful maf role?
Could be faking ascetic.
Could be, but less likely than him actually just being ascetic.
Assuming he's fake claiming at the start of day one is a stretch, especially for someone who's only been on the site a few months.
In post 1197, eagerSnake wrote:Yay my first time being MLed as town
In post 1335, Zoronos wrote:In post 1320, Shadow_step wrote:No point asking Eager for a full claim, he will probably claim a strong pro town role to draw a CC, so that his buddies can kill that player. No thanks.
We should absolutely ask for a full claim; if a PR dies to kill a scum, yay we killed a scum. There's basically no PR I wouldn't trade for a dead scum, especially a D1 dead scum.
I'm not nearly as LOCK SOLID SCUM KILL KILL as you are, and I think you need to appreciate that a lot of other players in this game aren't either. Trying to ram the lynch through as fast as possible is a bad plan.
In post 1427, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:Can you explain why you claimed at the time you did then?
In post 1485, nn30 wrote:@Shadow - I don't know where you got the idea you'd die tonight?
In post 1560, Gamma Emerald wrote:So other than Eager, Maria and implosion, who believed there could be 2 town ascetics?
In post 1046, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:In post 959, Shadow_step wrote:In post 928, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
I think you're gambling scum who failed to plan out a distraction.
Jesus Christ, stop playing you're fucking terrible. Gambiting mafia lmao
You're the one that's terrible my friend. The only case you have on Eager is that you cannot fathom that both you and him were given the same role. You either refuse or won't take into consideration a town motive for lying. If Eager had not claimed, your read on him would be null. You have no backup plan if he flips town and if he flips scum, it's an excuse to push on anyone who defended him or didn't vote for him.
In post 1580, implosion wrote:Take this with a grain of salt because there's definitely a grain or two in there from my current mood: generally, shadow's reasoning for me being scum feels to me like it amounts to "I wasn't right yesterday, so no townie can POSSIBLY have been right yesterday."
which is, once again, projecting his feelings that eager was necessary to lynch at some point on to the whole game... I honestly would have loved to take both of them to endgame. I mentioned eager as one of my strongest townreads and fought his wagon for as long as it seemed like it would have any chance of actually doing anything for a reason. And it's honestly insulting for shadow to imply that there would be a point where we would "have to pl eager." I just on-principle disagree with that sentiment.
It's just absolutely infuriating to be called scum for having been correct about eagerSnake by the person who caused his lynch, won't admit that they caused his lynch, and is now continuing on to day two without even a tiny shred of humility or any indication that he's re-evaluating his view of the game in light of his by far strongest scumread flipping town. And yet he's still probably town.
Which is just infuriating.
In post 1770, Gamma Emerald wrote:And as I said, me pre-defending myself on ties to Eager clears me.
In post 2023, podoboq wrote:In post 2022, Shadow_step wrote:@mod, what result will a cop get on a traitor?
Quoting from the Traitor page on the Wiki: "(In Normal games, a Traitor) gives a 'guilty' result to Cops, an 'innocent' result to Gunsmiths, and a 'Traitor' result to Role Cops."
In post 2070, Dierfire wrote:I've read through both PenguinPower and Lil Uzi Vert again. I don't find the depth of analysis that I find in other players (Prism, Zoronos, Grendel). In general I'd characterize this as not making effort to solve the game, which is suspicious.
I suppose that, if I trusted my reads on Prism, Zoronos, and Grendel, I'd start lynching by POE and drop a hammer on Lil Uzi Vert, but I'm reluctant to do so for two reasons.
First, the wagon on Shadow_step after the claim yesterday does not strike me as the sort of place to find a high density of Mafia players (it would have been far easier to vote for eagerSnake). This means that Lil Uzi Vert (and nn30) should be less suspicious than the other players I'm having difficulty reading (boring, PenguinPower). As a parallel to that, if nn30 is less suspicious, it becomes difficult to see why no suspicious players are voting for boring in the quoted VC.
Second, I don't really trust my reads on Prism, Zoronos, and Grendel. I have reasons to read each as Town but I'm simply finding it too good to be true that I've narrowed the Mafia players down so much.In post 1150, podoboq wrote:
My vote is for boring. I haven't seen many good reasons to read her as Mafia, but I've seen none to read her as Town and I think that the VC shows, at a minimum, Mafia players avoiding her wagon.
VOTE: boring