In post 1206, Zoronos wrote:In post 1088, Grendel wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: EagerSnake
I was going to look more into boring since she is the leading wagon, but I feel like Snake is much scummier atm.
So, Grendel, you said you'd look into Boring. What did you come up with?
(I read back over the ISO like I said, I see the pivot point onto Eager from his previous Eager-Town, Boring-Suspicious stance. Not entirely convinced by it, but let's run this line of questioning and see where we go)
Yeah i'll look into boring. I was really hoping that Eager would be an open shut case, but I'm beginning to think its not.
PenguinPower wrote:In post 1238, nn30 wrote:Snake also pointed out that he parked his vote on Boring the entire day - and nobody nibbled - meaning 0 scum tried to hop onto the wagon and test the waters(implying that Boring herself is scum, causing the lack of interest in her wagon). I like this logic a lot.
Bold is mine. Since we're all fans of the complicated and intricate in this game, why could scum not orchestrate that in their day chat?
Are you implying that scum are trying to set up a boring lynch later?
I mean, why would scum consciously say, "lets not vote boring fam", if she were town. It seems like a pretty unlikely thing for town to pick up on normally. Therefore not something that scum would preemptively set up.
Do you think boring is town then?
Pre-edit
I hate playing when everybody is on all at once because I always feel like I'm getting flooded out by other's content .-.
Prism wrote:I'm also disturbed by the fact that virtually no one has read me for alignment or outed a single read on me in 24 posts.
Grendel's recent one is the closest attempt.
You poor, attention depraved soul.
I'll be sure to look more into you soon.
