Mini 530: Guitar Hero Mafia: It's Finally Over

[ChaosOmega]

Vote:Jex for having the shortest name.

Irrefutable logic.

vote: Jex

[ChaosOmega]

unvote, vote: DeliciousGoldfish

I'm going to assume that you're not being serious, which means all you're doing is random voting different people over and over. It's not helpful.

[ChaosOmega]

I voted to rock the boat, and rock it did

Well, if the boat doesn't rock, we get more pages of one-liners and ASCII art (not that the ASCII art wasn't cool). No, my reasoning wasn't fantastic, I was just trying to get the game rolling.

[ChaosOmega]

I agree with hasdgfas' post 82 that those two posts by d3sisted are suspicious. I'm going to

unvote

because my initial reason wasn't very good. Besides, he's seemed pro-town to me as of late.

vote Jex, FOS d3sisted

[ChaosOmega]

Sorry, I'm here, just very busy. Finals next week and whatnot.

I'll post why when I get back.

[ChaosOmega]

As for why I voted Jex, it was because I noticed he wasn't posting that much (Yes, yes, I'm in a glass house, I know). I wanted to vote d3sisted, but he had a lot of pressure on him at the time. And, I still want to vote d3sisted. Now that he has less pressure, I can

unvote, vote d3sisted

. Too many of his posts contradict each other.

[ChaosOmega]

Looking back through the game, it's making more sense to me why d3sisted kept jumping around; he just wants to blend it with other people.

Whoa. What's with the sudden jump to ChaosOmega?

Three posts before,

Ooh, odd reaction ChaosOmega. Doesn't warrant three votes though, even just for pressure.

Then Natude posts his suspicion of me and Cole posts saying nothing has happened, and then...

I think ChaosOmega should start talking.
We need more pressure up in here, by the way.
Unvote; Vote ChaosOmega

...you make a post showing suspicion and starting something. Your next post, however, baffles me.

First of all, DG, I am not "pushing hard" against CO. I placed a pressure vote on him to make him talk.
Thanatos, in case you haven't noticed, he still hasn't said jack since the pressure built; as far as I'm concerned, a L-2 was wholly necessary.

So you're not pushing hard, but you're willing to push me to L-2. What?

I'll finish this analysis tomorrow, I'm not feeling very well.

[ChaosOmega]

An L-2 vote that didn't actually happen, no less.

Yeah, but it's why I said willing. Even now, he's acting like L-2 isn't that big of a deal. Personally, I think it has more significance than what he suggests.

But here's what gets me: after Gorrad said to get rid of random votes to clear up the vote totals, d3sisted unvotes, which shows his vote is not too important. But he was just arguing before that I needed pressure. So which is it?

[ChaosOmega]

unvote, vote Natude

You keep saying you're worried about "lerking", but you're still doing it; it's just active lurking.

I'm worried about being accused of lerking because I've been lynched for it as town in the past. That and I find lerking suspisious myself.

I don't want to do what I don't like other people doing.

Sorry about the "not saying a damned thing" bit, but I really don't see anything that looks all that scummy (other than what I said in post 148), and I don't like saying things just for the sake of saying things.

I'll try to post a bit more content, but don't blame me if it doesn't really get us anywhere.

I don't see anything worth posting/asking about, so I just say I'm still here so as not to be accused of lerking. (It could still be considered lerking, but less likely.)

(Still Here. Still have nothing to comment about.)

(Still here, still not seeing much.)

Yet you still say this:

We don't have nearly enough information for a dead line, but we NEED to start posting here. We're on page 5 and we still have nothing to work off. It's driving me crazy!

You're complaining about lack of information? You really haven't provided any yourself.

[ChaosOmega]

My comment on what, exactly?

[ChaosOmega]

Just to clarify, Natude said that. It looks like you just messed up the quote tags.

[ChaosOmega]

I don't think I've accused anyone of lerking thus far.

Alright. How about these:

FOS Cole for not posting yet.

with the lack of posting, I'd say we need more information.

Can we get a few prods here? It's been too long since some of the players have posted, and not just ChaosOmega.

(Still here, still not seeing much.)

We don't have nearly enough information for a dead line, but we NEED to start posting here. We're on page 5 and we still have nothing to work off. It's driving me crazy!

Directly, no, you really haven't accused anybody. But you've been beating around the bush an awful lot that people need to post more, which would be fine, but you haven't posted much useful game-related information at all. And I know you've said you haven't seen anything to comment on, but you should find something. I just don't like the fact that you've openly admitted to lurking, but are angry at people for doing the same.

[ChaosOmega]

At the moment, I'm starting to postulate that you and d3s are scumbuddies and you're trying to save him from today's lynch by getting attention onto Natude.

Does that mean you think Natude is not scum?

But I don't like the way DeliciousGoldfish responded to that. Something to keep an eye on.

[ChaosOmega]

If I didn't mess anything up, I think this is the votecount up to now:

d3sisted (4): Thanatos, Natude, Gorrad, Haschel Cedricson
Natude (4): ChaosOmega, cole, hasdgfas, DeliciousGoldfish
perfect628 (1): d3sisted

With that said, Natude's post 208 was a refreshing change of pace. I'm going to leave my vote where it is, but I'll be more apt to change it at a later point.

[ChaosOmega]

If I didn't mess anything up, I think this is the votecount up to now:

d3sisted (4): Thanatos, Natude, Gorrad, Haschel Cedricson
Natude (4): ChaosOmega, cole, hasdgfas, DeliciousGoldfish
perfect628 (1): d3sisted

With that said, Natude's post 208 was a refreshing change of pace. I'm going to leave my vote where it is, but I'll be more apt to change it at a later point.

[ChaosOmega]

Posting to say I'm still here.

Waiting to see what DeliciousGoldfish has to say.

[ChaosOmega]

vote: Haschel Cedricson

[ChaosOmega]

Gorrad: They might just be voting you because your reasoning is terrible.

[ChaosOmega]

That is a surprisingly good point. Thoughts?

That it's completely WIFOM. She could have that song and be scum, and then say that to make you believe she's not scum by claiming that. I'm willing to hammer, but it's not so much because of SeraphicMirth's play as it is of d3sisted's play Day 1. In addition to it being poor, d3sisted had some connections with DeliciousGoldfish, who turned out to be a mafia goon.

[ChaosOmega]

I think we've gotten about all we will get out of today.

unvote, vote SeraphicMirth

[ChaosOmega]

Well, since you've already claimed, can you give your song name, hasdgfas?

vote Gorrad

[ChaosOmega]

He doesn't have a song name. He, like myself, has a role that's a part of the game, not a song.

I find it interesting that you know his role name is not a song. Care to enlighten the rest of the class on how you know this?

[ChaosOmega]

*facepalm*

Forget I said anything.

[ChaosOmega]

unvote

Why would you claim without being under pressure of a lynch? Espeically considering the role pretty much guarantees that you'll die tonight. I don't like that at all.

vote TheSweatpantsNinja

[ChaosOmega]

Gorrad: I like the motivating someone pro-town plan. I think it's a great strategy. Especially if they confirm it hit them, so that way we can lose two power roles as opposed to one.

And TheSweatpantsNinja, as to why I think you're scum. Two of your more recent posts have struck me the wrong way. The first one:

I think she's town. But may as well wait until we know for sure before deciding what to do next.

You say this right before the lynch scene is posted, showing SeraphicMirth to be a townie. It looks like you posted that to look innocent. It looks like something scum would say, knowing that it's a mislynch. As for your second post:

If he's not dead tomorrow, then we should probably lynch him then.

Someone mentioned it before, but that's a shitload of WIFOM. This post, plus your post before casting doubt on his role, makes it look like you're trying whatever you can to get Gorrad lynched, whether it be today or the next day.

[ChaosOmega]

Still here. Still waiting on the thoughts of the replacements.

[ChaosOmega]

I can see a vig going for somebody like SilverPhoenix. Didn't post much at all day 1, especially near the end. There was pretty much no read on him. Worst case scenario, the vig kills a pro-town player not helping the town; best case scenario, he hits lurking mafia that nobody has a read on.

Granted, it could have been a SK hoping to nail a power role trying not to draw a lot of attention, but then we devolve into huge amounts of WIFOM. Just posting the other side of it.

[ChaosOmega]

With only 8 people, 3 people voting for a person is fairly significant.

[ChaosOmega]

I wonder if TheSweatpantsNinja and Alabaska J being scum together would be too blatant.

[ChaosOmega]

Why is this game overwhelming? This should (hopefully) be your slowest moving game, although now it's slowed down because we're waiting for your post.

unvote, vote CoheedCambria09

Maybe a little more pressure will help the post along. Usually, I wouldn't do this, but we've got 5 days to deadline, so we need to get moving.

[ChaosOmega]

unvote, vote TheSweatpantsNinja

With Haschel Cedricson as the last scum for wanting to lynch a claimed power role.

[ChaosOmega]

Not quite. Well, unless being drunk gave Haschel Cedricson the ability to double-vote. That makes 4 votes on TheSweatpantsNinja, with 5 to lynch.