it's a retirement home for top players atm, who rake in some more money after a succesful carreer. Really don't think a salary cap is the issue, exposure and competition is.In post 7071, BROseidon wrote:This isn't really a great comparison because a lot of what holds the MLS back is the salary cap. There are clubs that could fork over more money to buy more international talent (LA Galaxy and NYCFC are pretty loaded), but the salary cap and the wonky rules around it with designated players and funny money limit how much clubs can bring in "top players" to bolster their rosters. You could also argue that international slots, to a degree, hold back the MLS, but that would really only be a compelling argument if the salary cap weren't already such a big hamper.
See, salary cap isn't the issue. Bradley had the name (bc lets be honest, I've seen him play, not an exceptional talent), and cashed out on it.In post 7073, BROseidon wrote:Going back to the soccer thing, look at Michael Bradley. He'd probably be a better player if he stayed in Europe, but $6.5m Canadian/yr was too hard to pass up.
Which is why I think the comparison is rather apt. Do you think Piglet, or Ryu, or Deft left Korea, because they had some will to compete at the highest level? Neither do the Europeans who move over to the states in football. Ryu wanted an easier route to worlds, maybe Piglet too, but lets be fair, money played into it. And we'll still watch EULCS and NALCS with the same amount interest, even when they are playing worse. It doesn't make those leagues pointless, because your team plays in it and you get your Phreak puns.