PeregrineV wrote:Vote: doomfeathers
Sounds like a badly named D&D Magic item that everyone wants once you can see what it does for the first time.
Thank you, I think. It's hard to remember where from, but I recognize the avatars of PeregrineV, MariaR, and SpyreX. I've played with Gamma Emerald.SpyreX wrote:Like who and what I'm just curious what the meta be these days.In post 11, doomfeathers wrote:Wow. I'm seeing a lot of names and avatars I recognize from important places. I might just be in over my head here. I'm going to go ahead and pretend I'm not, though.
Its metameta
If this turns out to be true, I'm voting Transcend. Daykilling without finding out who's scummy would be an incredible waste. I'm not sure why scum would do that, either, but at least they know who they want to kill.
This sounds weird. VOTE: Transcend.In post 62, Transcend wrote:In post 53, Road Kamelot wrote:Hey losers real sorry but im busy af tonight
Looking forward to this game tho wooooo
VOTE: Transcend
if i get lynched first to vote me dies with me
you have been warned
Cool.PeregrineV wrote:I like that webcomic! I'm waiting to read it all over again when I have lots of time. Just the premise is awesome.In post 63, doomfeathers wrote:Yes! It's Sean McNinja!In post 55, PeregrineV wrote:Is that a Dr. McNinja avatar?
I haven't met anyone else before who reads it.I know. I'm saying that the daykill isn't a good reason to vote at this point and that it's not my reason for voting.PeregrineV wrote:Probably. But not scummy.In post 69, doomfeathers wrote:This sounds weird. VOTE: Transcend.In post 62, Transcend wrote:In post 53, Road Kamelot wrote:Hey losers real sorry but im busy af tonight
Looking forward to this game tho wooooo
VOTE: Transcend
if i get lynched first to vote me dies with me
you have been warned
(I'm pretty sure the daykill was a joke, by the way.)
This is my third game.In post 81, Transcend wrote:how much experience do you have with the game of mafia doomfeathers
Do you think it would more likely to come from a scum or townie viewpoint? I haven't dealt with softclaiming before.PeregrineV wrote:In both cases, to avoid the lynch.In post 80, doomfeathers wrote:Transcend might be softclaiming a vengeful role. This seems scummy to me, though I can't explain quite why. Would scum have motivation to do this? Would town?
And soft the fact they have a role.
No, in recursive.PeregrineV wrote:With a pen?
I don't get it. Would you care to explain?SpyreX wrote:There were two crows in my yard. I called the police to arrest them for attempted murder
I don't think I want to know where that came from.In post 89, Dunnstral wrote:It really is liberating knowing I'll never have to wear clothes again
I figured you were probably joking, but I think joking about doing scummy things is more likely to come from scum as a sort of reverse psychology. I know I'd be tempted to do it as scum. And I have read that claiming at the beginning of a game is scummy.In post 106, Transcend wrote:i see i see.In post 98, doomfeathers wrote:In post 81, Transcend wrote:
how much experience do you have with the game of mafia doomfeathers
This is my third game
well since you're new here i'll be the first to say that a decent portion of people like to troll around in the beginning stage of the game and claim/soft roles that they aren't. i may or may not be vengeful, you won't know that until a later time, however it's best not to assume anything. i don't want you to get the wrong idea or anything.
if you want i can provide examples of me trolling in the beginning stages of the game as both alignments.
Nice!SpyreX wrote:A group of crows is called a murder. Two would be attempted gosh.
And my phone my life deal w it
In post 212, drealmerz7 wrote:If you don't think I know what the word distancing is, then you don't understand that I was being silly.
I can't figure out YOUR thought process, and I'm not assuming you're a lost noob who doesn't know shade from an umbrella tree.
The only thought process I can "see" is : "hey, new guy! fresh meat! let's push him and see if we can make him crack and melt and be the D1 lynch" making assumptions about my experience level, and, not treating me with respect as a player because of that.
These things are scummy to me. and the more we interact, the more you dig yourself into that hole, which, I'm not even looking to put you in, but, you're just still at me after 4 pages of me not responding to your vote on me like you wanted me to? If this is your town game, wow.
In post 222, drealmerz7 wrote:That's when I started thinking: "Geebus, here I'm being silly and this dude can't seem to deal." and so I tossed a little bait, and, we've been going at it for pages
he thinks I'm town, but hasn't removed his vote
rather than kindly friendly townily say "hey, man, you know what distancing is?" to be sure, he condescended and treated me like an idiot
that's scummy in my world - if he's town, well, damn me, but, messing around with someone you don't know and letting it go on for so long? I just don't get it.
hence the "can't figure out his thought process"
In post 227, drealmerz7 wrote:obviously anyone who votes me is scum, right?
Seriously? Drealmerz appears to be viciously attacking people who vote for him, even if they have unvoted. He's very concerned with defending himself from a very short wagon. This ain't townish. VOTE: Drealmerz7In post 248, drealmerz7 wrote:They are sometimes so subtle you don't feel the jab and you're off running with it before you realize, it's okay.In post 245, Transcend wrote:I don't understand how you "baited" me.
I baited you a few times (actually what I did was bait you once, then after give you opportunities to release the bait, and you just persisted.) Each time you treated me with disrespect / condescension / dismissiveness. Why? Just answer that.
I did what I think should be viewed as "well that guy is just being silly, is he drunk?" and you viewed it as "that guy must be dumb."
Like, it wasn't even borderline stuff that I think could be questionable. I fucking said I checked my PM to see if we were scum-buddies, and I made the comment about distancing. That stuff is RIDICULOUS, and yet, you didn't just laugh it off, you either took it seriously, or presumed to take it seriously. and yet your subsequent behavior was not towny at all.
Like I said, I can't see any thought process that isn't scum going "ooo, vulnerable lynch-bait! let's get 'em!" - which is the whole reason I did all of what I did in the first place!! I'm open to hearing another thought process, but I haven't.
All I'm trying to do is scumhunt.
Good grief. Still, I see you guys' points about him. UNVOTE: drealmerz7In post 265, drealmerz7 wrote:It may be NAI for you (or so you claim) but that doesn't mean it's not anti-town, which, for me, if you do much is going to makeIn post 259, Transcend wrote:I'm condescending as both alignments so if you think me being condescending is an alignment tell, you're gonna have a bad time.youhave a bad time because I am going to hound you to no end (other than a lynch) if you treat my fellow townies in an anti-town manner. Anti-town behavior is lynchworthy in my game. It's a sliding scale and contingent and all that, but, yep.
Nice.In post 325, SpyreX wrote:What the hell did you guys do while i was sleeping.
Transcends block is good minus maria. Dreamykun is p town still we didn't need the muck to reaffirm.
Gear town too this game is shaping up good work lads.
They say imitation is the highest form of flattery but they're wrong. A plateau is.
Oatmeal raisin, no question.In post 342, Transcend wrote:Chocolate chip or snickerdoodles?In post 330, PeregrineV wrote:Tradition requires that you serve cookies.In post 238, Transcend wrote:IMO
Pere/Maria/Transcend/doomfeather/SpyreX townbloc
drealmerz is a guy we never lynch but don't let have a say so in anything.
lezzzgooooo
An early suggestion of a townbloc could be suspect. Just something to remember in case more comes up on him later.In post 238, Transcend wrote:IMO
Pere/Maria/Transcend/doomfeather/SpyreX townbloc
drealmerz is a guy we never lynch but don't let have a say so in anything.
lezzzgooooo
This could come from either scum or town motivation. Gear could go either way.In post 324, Gear wrote:My gut says that Transcend is town, but if I wanted, I could make some sort of case on him, but I'd bet it would be wrong, so for the time being I'm going to stick with my gut, and see how things pan out.
Is he using refuge in audacity to signal his scumpartner? Probably not. But let's not assume it couldn't be the case. Are Gear and iraonavp friends or something? It just seems weird to me.In post 324, Gear wrote:Finally Dunnstral is scum, and it's shame that this guy,didn't notice.In post 312, iraonavp wrote:Not sure, but I don't want to vote anyone else.
Is this still true? You have your vote on one of them. What do you think of iraonavp?In post 164, PeregrineV wrote:I don't think the top three wagons are on scum.
drealmerz7 wrote:or he's pocketing you!
I think drealmerz7 is town. This paranoia would be hard to fake. These posts scream sincerity in my opinion.drealmerz7 wrote:or he's fake pocketing you cause you're scum-buds
but, he could just really understand, too!
Sorry, what? I'm not understanding what you're saying.In post 400, SpyreX wrote:I hear this shit all the time. Town muder posse is tech and every time i ask for data i get fartnoises.In post 351, Bins wrote:ya ppl who suggest townblocs are usually scum HAAA....
triggered
never trust the townbloc former
they are just looking for friends and ppl to kill after tea time
Every person who says this isnt in it i swear
The thing that caught my eye is that iraona hasn't been a complete lurker. He has made a few posts; he just hasn't posted anything helpful. This seems to me to be a good scum strategy if scum can get away with it--to appear active while not really giving much to notice or read.In post 412, Road Kamelot wrote:Ehhh, im not sold
He isnt usually a top scumhunter hes just iraon
Is lazy posting all that scummy?
If i didnt say so already, doomfeathers is town
That's actually a pretty good point.In post 437, Bins wrote:also not angry more just peeved that people still call people lurking even tho its been a day
Could you explain how a townbloc with scum in it helps?In post 446, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah sure scum can make it into a townbloc but it works anyways, and if a person who has objected to several lynches flips scum, you can form some good associations.
In post 449, Bins wrote:IRA LETS FORM A TOWNBLOCIn post 447, iraonavp wrote:It's not true, I'm not pretending to be helpful...In post 408, doomfeathers wrote:Out of all his posts, iraonavp has said three things: He townreads PeregrineV, he has no read on SpireX, and Gear "seems like a good vote" because he "doesn't want to vote anyone else". He has offered no reasons in any of that and seems to be pretending to be helpful while doing nothing. Coincidentally, his vote was on someone who already had a voter.
I just don't have any strong reads at the moment.
ira is lean town too btw
My read on drealmerz has flipped; I'm giving him a townlean for now.In post 446, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah sure scum can make it into a townbloc but it works anyways, and if a person who has objected to several lynches flips scum, you can form some good associations.
Is this blatant OMGUS?In post 465, iraonavp wrote:Okay, Gamma Emerald is scum-aligned then.In post 362, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually I like the iraonavp wagon idea more. He hasn't caught up but posted like he was.
...like he already knows everything...
VOTE: iraonavp
I was talking to Gamma with the first part of that post.In post 472, iraonavp wrote:Okay, but you have to unvote once I make the list.In post 467, doomfeathers wrote:Could you explain how a townbloc with scum in it helps?In post 446, Gamma Emerald wrote:Yeah sure scum can make it into a townbloc but it works anyways, and if a person who has objected to several lynches flips scum, you can form some good associations.
I still don't feel comfortable with iraonavp, and I'm not scumreading Bins for the bloc conversation. VOTE: iraonavp
What? Could you explain why this is scummier than you scumreading him for scumreading you?In post 475, iraonavp wrote:See, exactly!In post 473, Gamma Emerald wrote:We all know what error iraonavp is making here.In post 465, iraonavp wrote:Okay, Gamma Emerald is scum-aligned then.In post 362, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually I like the iraonavp wagon idea more. He hasn't caught up but posted like he was.
...like he already knows everything...
VOTE: iraonavp
VOTE: iraonavp
Possible opportunism noted.In post 481, BigYoshiFan wrote:Okay, I've caught up as much as I could allow my brain to read. I'm sorry if you don't like townblocks but here's mine: PeregrineV, Doomfeathers (not really a block, but whatever)
In terms of scum, I'm completely flustered. I've got a lot of people on my list for potential scum, but my strongest are Iraonavp and bins.
Ira really because upon entering the game, instead of catching up he's just asking who to lynch. He acknowledges he's catching up in 308, but doesn't really offer any reads or questions from before that.
Bins also for not making an effort to catch up and his posts. His posts... they ping me. I don't know if it's the lack of punctuation, or lack of actual information and analysis, but something just seems off.
I don't know if making reads because they don't feel like catching up is an accurate method of scumhunting but... I don't know. I'm tired.
I'll focus some more on the recent posts.
You didn't state what the list was of, but I'd guess reads from least scummy to most scummy. I'm not unvoting you for it.In post 484, iraonavp wrote:No, not that list...
This list:
14. PeregrineV
15. doomfeathers
2. drealmerz7
4. Road Kamelot
8. SpyreX
11. Dunnstral
12. gerryoat
16. MariaR
6. Gear
7. BigYoshiFan
1. Transcend
10. grapes
9. ChaosOmega
5. Gamma Emerald
13. Bins
It still sounds to me like complicated revenge-fingering. Iraonavp and Gamma Emerald could be distancing.In post 485, iraonavp wrote:It's what I expect him to do in response...In post 479, doomfeathers wrote:What? Could you explain why this is scummier than you scumreading him for scumreading you?In post 475, iraonavp wrote:See, exactly!In post 473, Gamma Emerald wrote:We all know what error iraonavp is making here.In post 465, iraonavp wrote:Okay, Gamma Emerald is scum-aligned then.In post 362, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually I like the iraonavp wagon idea more. He hasn't caught up but posted like he was.
...like he already knows everything...
VOTE: iraonavp
VOTE: iraonavp
No, I didn't; I read a few pages. And you actually played through at least part of it, so you had a better impression than I.In post 495, Gamma Emerald wrote:Wait lol you read it already.
